From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Input issues - key down with no key up
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:36:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030815123641.GA7204@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030815105802.GA14836@ucw.cz>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:58:02PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > I have a notebook (Dell Latitude D800) which has some keys (actual
> > > fn+something combinations) that generate Down events but no Up events
> > > (clever, isn't it).
> > > This makes those keys unusable with 2.6.0 as it is
> > I think we should go for the simple fix: only enable the timer-induced
> > repeat when the user asks for that (say, by boot parameter).
> > The keyboard already knows which keys repeat and which don't.
> That won't solve it - the key, while not repeating would be still
> considered 'down' by the kernel and any more pressing of the key
> wouldn't do anything.
Yes, it would still be considered down. But that does not imply
that pressing it doesnt do anything. It is up to the driver
to discard key presses, and I think it shouldnt.
(Unless of course the user asks for that behaviour - it may be required
on some broken laptops.)
Just the simple: a keypress generates an interrupt and we see a keystroke.
Use a kernel timer only when we know or the user tells us that it is needed.
Not in the default situation.
> My proposed solution is to do an input_report_key(pressed) immediately
> followed by input_report_key(released) for these keys straight in
> atkbd.c. Possibly based on some flag in the scancode->keycode table for
> that scancode.
But that would require users to report on precisely which keys are affected
and would give complications where I suppose 2.4 did not have any.
This is the way towards an ever more complicated keyboard driver.
Not what you would want.
Andries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-15 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-15 5:16 Input issues - key down with no key up Neil Brown
2003-08-15 7:46 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-15 10:58 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-15 12:36 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2003-08-15 12:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-15 13:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-15 13:52 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-15 14:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-15 15:05 ` Jason Lunz
2003-08-15 13:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-15 13:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-15 13:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-15 13:53 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-16 13:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-16 14:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-17 21:54 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-18 12:22 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-18 10:29 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-19 13:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-19 17:48 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 11:37 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 12:44 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 13:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 14:28 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 14:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 13:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-21 14:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 14:14 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-21 14:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 14:44 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 15:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 15:29 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-16 13:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-15 12:46 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-15 12:54 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-15 13:52 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-15 14:13 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-16 7:57 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-18 16:01 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-19 11:40 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-19 11:50 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-19 23:59 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-20 22:36 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-20 22:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-20 23:52 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 0:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-21 0:33 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 1:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-21 8:08 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-21 8:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-21 11:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 12:48 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-21 13:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-21 13:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-21 8:01 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-22 0:27 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-22 7:33 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-25 4:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-25 8:22 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-25 19:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-03 8:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 13:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-16 15:15 John Bradford
2003-08-18 11:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-08-19 19:37 John Bradford
2003-08-19 23:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-20 5:59 John Bradford
2003-08-20 15:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-21 12:11 John Bradford
2003-08-21 12:26 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-08-23 12:30 Norman Diamond
2003-08-25 4:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-25 12:15 ` Norman Diamond
2003-08-25 8:45 John Bradford
2003-08-25 12:47 John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030815123641.GA7204@win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).