From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Subject: Re: [v7 4/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:57:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120127155725.86654035.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327572121-13673-5-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:01:57 +0200
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
> Add the on_each_cpu_cond() function that wraps on_each_cpu_mask()
> and calculates the cpumask of cpus to IPI by calling a function supplied
> as a parameter in order to determine whether to IPI each specific cpu.
>
> The function works around allocation failure of cpumask variable in
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y by itereating over cpus sending an IPI a
> time via smp_call_function_single().
>
> The function is useful since it allows to seperate the specific
> code that decided in each case whether to IPI a specific cpu for
> a specific request from the common boilerplate code of handling
> creating the mask, handling failures etc.
>
> ...
>
> @@ -153,6 +162,16 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
> local_irq_enable(); \
> } \
> } while (0)
> +#define on_each_cpu_cond(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfpflags) \
> + do { \
> + preempt_disable(); \
> + if (cond_func(0, info)) { \
> + local_irq_disable(); \
> + (func)(info); \
> + local_irq_enable(); \
Ordinarily, local_irq_enable() in such a low-level thing is dangerous,
because it can cause horrid bugs when called from local_irq_disable()d
code.
However I think we're OK here because it is a bug to call on_each_cpu()
and friends with local irqs disabled, yes?
Do we have any warnings printks if someone calls the ipi-sending
functions with local interrupts disabled? I didn't see any, but didn't
look very hard.
If my above claims are correct then why does on_each_cpu() use
local_irq_save()? hrm.
> + } \
> + preempt_enable(); \
> + } while (0)
>
> static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
> #define num_booting_cpus() 1
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index a081e6c..fa0912a 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -730,3 +730,61 @@ void on_each_cpu_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func,
> put_cpu();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
> +
> +/*
> + * on_each_cpu_cond(): Call a function on each processor for which
> + * the supplied function cond_func returns true, optionally waiting
> + * for all the required CPUs to finish. This may include the local
> + * processor.
> + * @cond_func: A callback function that is passed a cpu id and
> + * the the info parameter. The function is called
> + * with preemption disabled. The function should
> + * return a blooean value indicating whether to IPI
> + * the specified CPU.
> + * @func: The function to run on all applicable CPUs.
> + * This must be fast and non-blocking.
> + * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to both functions.
> + * @wait: If true, wait (atomically) until function has
> + * completed on other CPUs.
> + * @gfpflags: GFP flags to use when allocating the cpumask
> + * used internally by the function.
> + *
> + * The function might sleep if the GFP flags indicates a non
> + * atomic allocation is allowed.
> + *
> + * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
> + * from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
> + */
> +void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
> + smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
> + gfp_t gfpflags)
bah.
z:/usr/src/linux-3.3-rc1> grep -r gfpflags . | wc -l
78
z:/usr/src/linux-3.3-rc1> grep -r gfp_flags . | wc -l
548
> +{
> + cpumask_var_t cpus;
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + might_sleep_if(gfpflags & __GFP_WAIT);
For the zalloc_cpumask_var(), it seems. I expect there are
might_sleep() elsewhere in the memory allocation paths, but putting one
here will detect bugs even if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n.
> + if (likely(zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, (gfpflags|__GFP_NOWARN)))) {
> + preempt_disable();
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + if (cond_func(cpu, info))
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
> + on_each_cpu_mask(cpus, func, info, wait);
> + preempt_enable();
> + free_cpumask_var(cpus);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * No free cpumask, bother. No matter, we'll
> + * just have to IPI them one by one.
> + */
> + preempt_disable();
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + if (cond_func(cpu, info)) {
> + ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func,
> + info, wait);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret);
> + }
> + preempt_enable();
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);
I assume the preempt_disable()s here are to suspend CPU hotplug?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-26 10:01 [v7 0/8] Reduce cross CPU IPI interference Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 10:01 ` [v7 1/8] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask function Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-29 12:24 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-30 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 6:33 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 10:01 ` [v7 2/8] arm: move arm over to generic on_each_cpu_mask Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 10:01 ` [v7 3/8] tile: move tile to use " Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 10:01 ` [v7 4/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-27 23:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-01-29 12:04 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 10:01 ` [v7 5/8] slub: only IPI CPUs that have per cpu obj to flush Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 15:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-26 10:01 ` [v7 6/8] fs: only send IPI to invalidate LRU BH when needed Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 10:02 ` [v7 7/8] mm: only IPI CPUs to drain local pages if they exist Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 15:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-28 0:12 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-29 12:18 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-30 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 6:32 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-30 14:59 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-30 15:14 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-30 15:44 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-26 10:02 ` [v7 8/8] mm: add vmstat counters for tracking PCP drains Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-26 15:19 ` [v7 0/8] Reduce cross CPU IPI interference Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-29 8:25 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-01 17:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-02 8:46 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-02 15:41 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-02-05 11:46 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-10 18:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 20:13 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-10 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 20:39 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-10 18:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 20:33 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-15 21:50 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-02-15 22:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-15 23:44 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-02-21 1:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-01 18:27 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-02-10 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 20:24 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-15 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 15:19 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-15 21:51 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-02-02 16:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-02 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-09 15:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-09 15:59 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-02-09 18:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-09 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-09 18:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-01 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-01 17:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-02 9:42 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-01 18:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 20:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-01 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-02 15:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 16:14 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-02 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 17:23 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-02 17:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-05 12:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-05 16:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-09 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-09 16:05 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-09 18:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-09 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-10 1:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-14 13:18 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-21 0:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-02 17:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-05 12:06 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-06 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-09 15:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120127155725.86654035.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).