From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply()
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:02:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204190250.GA10868@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204190225.GA10840@redhat.com>
Currently it is not possible to change the filtering constraints after
uprobe_register(), so a consumer can not, say, start to trace a task/mm
which was previously filtered out, or remove the no longer needed bp's.
Introduce uprobe_apply() which simply does register_for_each_vma() again
to consult uprobe_consumer->filter() and install/remove the breakpoints.
The only complication is that register_for_each_vma() can no longer
assume that uprobe->consumers should be consulter if is_register == T,
so we change it to accept "struct uprobe_consumer *new" instead.
Unlike uprobe_register(), uprobe_apply(true) doesn't do "unregister" if
register_for_each_vma() fails, it is up to caller to handle the error.
Note: we probably need to cleanup the current interface, it is strange
that uprobe_apply/unregister need inode/offset. We should either change
uprobe_register() to return "struct uprobe *", or add a private ->uprobe
member in uprobe_consumer. And in the long term uprobe_apply() should
take a single argument, uprobe or consumer, even "bool add" should go
away.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 95d0002..02b83db 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ extern int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
extern int __weak set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
extern bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
extern int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
+extern int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
extern void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
extern int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
extern void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
@@ -124,6 +125,11 @@ uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int
+uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
static inline void
uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 23340a7..2bcd08e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -733,8 +733,10 @@ build_map_info(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t offset, bool is_register)
return curr;
}
-static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
+static int
+register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
{
+ bool is_register = !!new;
struct map_info *info;
int err = 0;
@@ -765,7 +767,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
if (is_register) {
/* consult only the "caller", new consumer. */
- if (consumer_filter(uprobe->consumers,
+ if (consumer_filter(new,
UPROBE_FILTER_REGISTER, mm))
err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
} else if (test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags)) {
@@ -788,7 +790,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
- return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
+ return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, uc);
}
static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
@@ -798,7 +800,7 @@ static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *u
if (!consumer_del(uprobe, uc)) /* WARN? */
return;
- err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, false);
+ err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, NULL);
/* TODO : cant unregister? schedule a worker thread */
if (!uprobe->consumers && !err)
delete_uprobe(uprobe);
@@ -855,6 +857,35 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_register);
/*
+ * uprobe_apply - unregister a already registered probe.
+ * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
+ * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
+ * @uc: consumer which wants to add more or remove some breakpoints
+ * @add: add or remove the breakpoints
+ */
+int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
+ struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
+{
+ struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ struct uprobe_consumer *con;
+ int ret = -ENOENT;
+
+ uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
+ if (!uprobe)
+ return ret;
+
+ down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
+ for (con = uprobe->consumers; con && con != uc ; con = con->next)
+ ;
+ if (con)
+ ret = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, add ? uc : NULL);
+ up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
+ put_uprobe(uprobe);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
* uprobe_unregister - unregister a already registered probe.
* @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
* @offset: offset from the start of the file.
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: Ensure we do not free event->parent before event Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-20 13:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Introduce hw_perf_event->tp_target and ->tp_list Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-02-11 9:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply() Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to track the active perf_event's Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to pre-filter Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:46 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to use UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/perf: Avoid uprobe_apply() whenever possible Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42 ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/tools: Fix "perf record -C... workload" behaviour Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-25 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-07 6:01 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Namhyung Kim
2013-02-07 15:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130204190250.GA10868@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).