linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to pre-filter
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:02:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204190258.GA10882@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204190225.GA10840@redhat.com>

Finally implement uprobe_perf_filter() which checks ->nr_systemwide or
->perf_events to figure out whether we need to insert the breakpoint.

uprobe_perf_open/close are changed to do uprobe_apply(true/false) when
the new perf event comes or goes away.

Note that currently this is very suboptimal:

	- uprobe_register() called by TRACE_REG_PERF_REGISTER becomes a
	  heavy nop, consumer->filter() always returns F at this stage.

	  As it was already discussed we need uprobe_register_only() to
	  avoid the costly register_for_each_vma() when possible.

	- uprobe_apply() is oftenly overkill. Unless "nr_systemwide != 0"
	  changes we need uprobe_apply_mm(), unapply_uprobe() is almost
	  what we need.

	- uprobe_apply() can be simply avoided sometimes, see the next
	  changes.

Testing:

	# perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 syscall

	# perl -e 'syscall -1 while 1' &
	[1] 530

	# perf record -e probe_libc:syscall perl -e 'syscall -1 for 1..10; sleep 1'

	# perf report --show-total-period
		100.00%            10     perl  libc-2.8.so    [.] syscall

Before this patch:

	# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
		/lib/libc.so.6 syscall				79291

A huge ->nrhit == 79291 reflects the fact that the background process
530 constantly hits this breakpoint too, even if doesn't contribute to
the output.

After the patch:

	# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
		/lib/libc.so.6 syscall				10

This shows that only the target process was punished by int3.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index f05ec32..5d5a261 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -554,7 +554,12 @@ static inline bool is_trace_uprobe_enabled(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
 	return tu->flags & (TP_FLAG_TRACE | TP_FLAG_PROFILE);
 }
 
-static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
+typedef bool (*filter_func_t)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
+				enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx,
+				struct mm_struct *mm);
+
+static int
+probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag, filter_func_t filter)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -564,6 +569,7 @@ static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
 	WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(&tu->filter));
 
 	tu->flags |= flag;
+	tu->consumer.filter = filter;
 	ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
 	if (ret)
 		tu->flags &= ~flag;
@@ -653,6 +659,22 @@ static int set_print_fmt(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+static bool
+__uprobe_perf_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct perf_event *event;
+
+	if (filter->nr_systemwide)
+		return true;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(event, &filter->perf_events, hw.tp_list) {
+		if (event->hw.tp_target->mm == mm)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
@@ -662,6 +684,8 @@ static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
 		tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
 	write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
 
+	uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -674,9 +698,25 @@ static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
 		tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
 	write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
 
+	uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
+				enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
+	int ret;
+
+	tu = container_of(uc, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
+	read_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
+	ret = __uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->filter, mm);
+	read_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /* uprobe profile handler */
 static void uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -719,7 +759,7 @@ int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type,
 
 	switch (type) {
 	case TRACE_REG_REGISTER:
-		return probe_event_enable(tu, TP_FLAG_TRACE);
+		return probe_event_enable(tu, TP_FLAG_TRACE, NULL);
 
 	case TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER:
 		probe_event_disable(tu, TP_FLAG_TRACE);
@@ -727,7 +767,7 @@ int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
 	case TRACE_REG_PERF_REGISTER:
-		return probe_event_enable(tu, TP_FLAG_PROFILE);
+		return probe_event_enable(tu, TP_FLAG_PROFILE, uprobe_perf_filter);
 
 	case TRACE_REG_PERF_UNREGISTER:
 		probe_event_disable(tu, TP_FLAG_PROFILE);
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-04 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-04 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: Ensure we do not free event->parent before event Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-20 13:35   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Introduce hw_perf_event->tp_target and ->tp_list Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:44   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply() Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:43   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to track the active perf_event's Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:45   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-02-11  9:46   ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to pre-filter Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to use UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:54   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/perf: Avoid uprobe_apply() whenever possible Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42   ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42     ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/tools: Fix "perf record -C... workload" behaviour Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-25  9:58       ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-07  6:01     ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Namhyung Kim
2013-02-07 15:22       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130204190258.GA10882@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jistone@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).