linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to use UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:03:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204190301.GA10885@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204190225.GA10840@redhat.com>

Change uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func() to return "int". Change
Change uprobe_dispatcher() to return "trace_ret | perf_ret" although this
is not really needed, currently TP_FLAG_TRACE/TP_FLAG_PROFILE are mutually
exclusive.

The only functional change is that uprobe_perf_func() checks the filtering
too and returns UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE if nobody wants to trace current.

Testing:

	# perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 syscall

	# perf record -e probe_libc:syscall -i perl -e 'fork; syscall -1 for 1..10; wait'

	# perf report --show-total-period
		100.00%            10     perl  libc-2.8.so    [.] syscall

Before this patch:

	# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
		/lib/libc.so.6 syscall				20

A child process doesn't have a counter, but still it hits this breakoint
"copied" by dup_mmap().

After the patch:

	# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
		/lib/libc.so.6 syscall				11

The child process hits this int3 only once and does unapply_uprobe().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 5d5a261..1114619 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static const struct file_operations uprobe_profile_ops = {
 };
 
 /* uprobe handler */
-static void uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
 	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	event = trace_current_buffer_lock_reserve(&buffer, call->event.type,
 						  size, irq_flags, pc);
 	if (!event)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
 	entry->ip = instruction_pointer(task_pt_regs(current));
@@ -511,6 +511,8 @@ static void uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	if (!filter_current_check_discard(buffer, call, entry, event))
 		trace_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event, irq_flags, pc);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /* Event entry printers */
@@ -718,7 +720,7 @@ static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
 }
 
 /* uprobe profile handler */
-static void uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->call;
 	struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
@@ -727,11 +729,14 @@ static void uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	int size, __size, i;
 	int rctx;
 
+	if (!uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->consumer, 0, current->mm))
+		return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
+
 	__size = sizeof(*entry) + tu->size;
 	size = ALIGN(__size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
 	size -= sizeof(u32);
 	if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	preempt_disable();
 
@@ -749,6 +754,7 @@ static void uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 
  out:
 	preempt_enable();
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif	/* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
 
@@ -789,18 +795,19 @@ int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type,
 static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
 	tu->nhit++;
 
 	if (tu->flags & TP_FLAG_TRACE)
-		uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs);
+		ret |= uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
 	if (tu->flags & TP_FLAG_PROFILE)
-		uprobe_perf_func(tu, regs);
+		ret |= uprobe_perf_func(tu, regs);
 #endif
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static struct trace_event_functions uprobe_funcs = {
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-04 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-04 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: Ensure we do not free event->parent before event Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-20 13:35   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Introduce hw_perf_event->tp_target and ->tp_list Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:44   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply() Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:43   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to track the active perf_event's Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:45   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to pre-filter Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:46   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-02-11  9:54   ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to use UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/perf: Avoid uprobe_apply() whenever possible Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42   ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42     ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/tools: Fix "perf record -C... workload" behaviour Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-25  9:58       ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-07  6:01     ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Namhyung Kim
2013-02-07 15:22       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130204190301.GA10885@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jistone@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).