From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] livepatch/rcu: Warn when system consistency is broken in RCU code
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:43:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170508204333.xc3isvr4riv26his@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170508201558.GD3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:15:58PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:47:29PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:13:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > If rcu is not watching, calling rcu_enter_irq() will have it watch
> > > again. Even in NMI context I believe.
> >
> > What if you get an NMI while running in rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter() before
> > it increments rdtp->dynticks? Will rcu_enter_irq() still work from the
> rcu_irq_enter()
> > NMI?
>
> The rcu_nmi_enter() function willl notice that RCU is not watching, and
> will therefore atomically increment RCU's dynticks-idle counter, which
> will be atomically incremented again upon return. Since the bottom bit
> of this counter controls whether or not RCU is watching, RCU will be
> watching during the NMI, will stop watching upon return from the NMI,
> which restores state so as to allow rcu_irq_enter() to cause RCU to once
> again watch. (NMI algorithm due to Andy Lutomirski.)
>
> > I'm just trying to understand what are the cases where rcu_enter_irq()
> > *doesn't* work from an ftrace handler.
>
> It doesn't work from an NMI handler. Aside from possible architecture
> specific special cases, it should work everywhere else.
Ok, so just to clarify. Is there a bug in the ftrace stack tracer in
the following situation?
1. RCU isn't watching
2. An NMI hits
3. ist_enter() calls into the ftrace stack tracer, before
rcu_nmi_enter() is called, so RCU isn't watching yet
4. The ftrace stack tracer calls rcu_irq_enter(), which has no effect,
so RCU still isn't watching
5. Hilarity ensues in the ftrace stack tracer
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-04 10:55 [PATCH 0/3] livepatch/rcu: Handle some subtle issues between livepatching and RCU Petr Mladek
2017-05-04 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] livepatch/rcu: Guarantee consistency when patching idle kthreads Petr Mladek
2017-05-04 10:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] livepatch/rcu: Warn when system consistency is broken in RCU code Petr Mladek
2017-05-08 16:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-08 19:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-08 19:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-08 20:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-08 20:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-05-08 20:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-08 21:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-08 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-08 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-08 21:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-08 22:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-08 22:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-09 16:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-09 16:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-10 16:04 ` Petr Mladek
2017-05-10 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-10 17:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-11 12:40 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-05-11 15:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-08 21:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-08 20:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-11 12:50 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-05-11 13:52 ` Petr Mladek
2017-05-11 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-11 15:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-05-11 12:44 ` Petr Mladek
2017-05-04 10:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] livepatch/rcu: Disable livepatch removal when safety is not guaranteed Petr Mladek
2017-05-04 16:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] livepatch/rcu: Handle some subtle issues between livepatching and RCU Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170508204333.xc3isvr4riv26his@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).