[PATCH v4 07/17] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL

[Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>]

Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() to avoid any inconsistency b/w the rate
computed in sam9x60_frac_pll_recalc_rate() and the one computed in
sam9x60_frac_pll_compute_mul_frac().

Fixes: 43b1bb4a9b3e1 ("clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: re-factor to support plls with multiple outputs")
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
index 7020d3bf6e13..a73d7c96ce1d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_frac_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	struct sam9x60_pll_core *core = to_sam9x60_pll_core(hw);
 	struct sam9x60_frac *frac = to_sam9x60_frac(core);
 
-	return (parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
-		((u64)parent_rate * frac->frac >> 22));
+	return parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
+		DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * frac->frac, (1 << 22));
 }
 
 static int sam9x60_frac_pll_set(struct sam9x60_pll_core *core)
-- 
2.25.1