Re: remaining flexible-array conversions

["Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>]

On 4/23/20 14:15, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:23 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just wanted to ask you if you would agree on pulling the remaining
>> flexible-array conversions all at once, after they bake for a couple
>> of weeks in linux-next[1]
>>
>> This is not a disruptive change and there are no code generation
>> differences.
> 
> The "no code generation differnces" is a good thing, but how was that
> tested? I assume just one configuration or architecture?
> 

That's correct. I used pahole to test it (x86_64, allyesconfig). I will
test other archs (arm, arm64, powerpc, mips, etc...).

> Also, it bothers me a bit that some of the diff is unrelated
> whitespace cleanup. I'd actually be happier with a pure scripted patch
> (maybe coccinelle, maybe something else), than something that looks
> like it's at least partly manual. In particular, if I can re-create
> the diff with a script, I'd not have to worry about verifying it other
> ways..
> 

Yeah. I fixed up some "tabs and spaces" checkpatch warnings --I can omit
this step in the future.  I also had to drop changes from files that were
causing warnings --with the idea of fixing those warnings later, after
landing all the "non-problematic" conversions, first. I will generate
an ad-hoc bash script for this and will send it to you.

Thanks
--
Gustavo