linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	b43-dev@lists.infradead.org,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] b43: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:08:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdnNuFySqAMk7s_cXqFM=dPX4JfvqNVLCuj90Gn4tzciAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603233203.1695403-4-keescook@chromium.org>

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:32 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g.
> "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either
> simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. As a precursor
> to removing[2] this[3] macro[4], just initialize this variable to NULL,
> and make the (unreachable!) code do a conditional test.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> index d3c001fa8eb4..88cdcea10d61 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> @@ -4222,7 +4222,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_tx_gain_table_upload(struct b43_wldev *dev)

The TODOs and `#if 0` in this function are concerning.  It looks like
`rf_pwr_offset_table` is only used when `phy->rev` is >=7 && < 19.

Further, the loop has a case for `phy->rev >= 19` but we would have
returned earlier if that was the case.

>         u32 rfpwr_offset;
>         u8 pga_gain, pad_gain;
>         int i;
> -       const s16 *uninitialized_var(rf_pwr_offset_table);
> +       const s16 *rf_pwr_offset_table = NULL;
>
>         table = b43_nphy_get_tx_gain_table(dev);
>         if (!table)
> @@ -4256,9 +4256,13 @@ static void b43_nphy_tx_gain_table_upload(struct b43_wldev *dev)
>                         pga_gain = (table[i] >> 24) & 0xf;
>                         pad_gain = (table[i] >> 19) & 0x1f;
>                         if (b43_current_band(dev->wl) == NL80211_BAND_2GHZ)
> -                               rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table[pad_gain];
> +                               rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table
> +                                               ? rf_pwr_offset_table[pad_gain]
> +                                               : 0;
>                         else
> -                               rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table[pga_gain];
> +                               rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table
> +                                               ? rf_pwr_offset_table[pga_gain]
> +                                               : 0;


The code is trying to check `phy->rev >= 7 && phy->rev < 19` once
before the loop, then set `rf_pwr_offset_table`, so having another
conditional on `rf_pwr_offset_table` in the loop is unnecessary. I'm
ok with initializing it to `NULL`, but I'm not sure the conditional
check is necessary.  Do you get a compiler warning otherwise?

>                 } else {
>                         pga_gain = (table[i] >> 24) & 0xF;
>                         if (b43_current_band(dev->wl) == NL80211_BAND_2GHZ)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200603233203.1695403-4-keescook%40chromium.org.



-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03 23:31 [PATCH 00/10] Remove uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Kees Cook
2020-06-04  7:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 11:41     ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 14:56       ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 15:22         ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 14:34     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 21:39       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 22:39         ` Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] drbd: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:56   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] b43: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:08   ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2020-06-04 20:18     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:25       ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05  9:20   ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:16   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05  9:18   ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] ide: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:29   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:20     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:29       ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-15 19:32         ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:58       ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] clk: st: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04  4:38   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 07/10] spi: davinci: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:40   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-04  0:02   ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04  1:40     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04  1:47       ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04  2:44         ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04  2:53           ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04  3:46             ` Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 09/10] treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Kees Cook
2020-06-04  3:33   ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04  4:02     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 10:45   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-06-04 13:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 14:59     ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 17:57       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 19:09       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-05  9:25   ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 10/10] compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-04  0:00   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-04  0:50   ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04  1:23 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04  1:44   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04  1:46     ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04  3:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04  7:26   ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 14:27     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKwvOdnNuFySqAMk7s_cXqFM=dPX4JfvqNVLCuj90Gn4tzciAw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).