linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Raceless module interface
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:55:00 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131740530.8911-100000@serv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17psOu-0008AW-00@starship>

Hi,

On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> > The exit itself can fail as well, so it has to be done by the module code
> > anyway (until it suceeds).
>
> That's debatable.  Arguably, a failed ->module_cleanup() should be
> retried on every rmmod -a, but expecting module.c to just keep
> retrying mindlessly on its own sounds too much like a busy wait.

That's not what I meant, if module_init fails the module goes directly to
the cleanup state and the module code calls module_exit. Depending on this
return value it continues to the exit state. Further exit attempts (if
necessary) are done on user request.

> > What DoS opportunities are there?
>
> Suppose the module exit relies on synchronize_kernel.  The attacker
> can force repeated synchronize_kernels, knowing that module.c will
> mindlessly do a synchronize_kernel every time a module init fails,
> whether needed or not.  Each synchronize_kernel takes an unbounded
> amount of time to complete, across which module.c holds a lock.

This can't happen:

	if (hook) {
		hook = NULL;
		synchronize();
	}

> > Module init failure is the exception
> > case and usally needs further attention, so we could actually disable
> > further attempts to load this module, unless the user tells us
> > specifically so.
>
> Sure, you can fix it by lathering on more complexity.  What you have
> to do is explain why we should do that, when there is a simpler and
> faster approach that doesn't introduce the problem in the first
> place.

It doesn't add any complexity (at least not to the kernel). A simple
approach might be that a failed kernel module cannot be loaded with
modprobe anymore, this sort of policy can be done in userspace.

> I take it that the points you didn't reply to are points that you
> agree with?  (The main point being, that we both advocate a simple,
> two-method interface for module load/unload.)

Basically yes, it's just that your initial RFC was more confusing than
helpful.

bye, Roman


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-13 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-04 18:02 Question about pseudo filesystems Jamie Lokier
2002-09-07 12:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-07 13:36   ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-07 18:27     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-07 19:47       ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-08  2:21         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-08  2:43           ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-15  1:41             ` Moving a mount point (was Re: Question about pseudo filesystems) Rob Landley
2002-09-08 16:00           ` Question about pseudo filesystems Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 19:48             ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-09 20:06               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10  0:44                 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-10  1:40                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10  1:56                     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-10  2:53                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10  3:26                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-10  3:47                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10  9:15                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10 10:17                     ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-11 18:35                       ` [RFC] Raceless module interface Daniel Phillips
2002-09-11 18:53                         ` Oliver Neukum
2002-09-11 19:20                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-11 20:29                             ` Oliver Neukum
2002-09-11 21:15                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-11 21:26                                 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-11 21:47                                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12  1:42                                     ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12  2:09                                       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-12  3:13                                         ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12  3:47                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12  3:53                                             ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-12  4:11                                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12  4:40                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12  5:27                                                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12 14:46                                                   ` Gerhard Mack
2002-09-13  0:39                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-13  2:23                                                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12  5:35                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12  4:52                                             ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12  5:58                                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12  7:00                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-13  8:18                                           ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-12  3:32                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-12  1:31                         ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12  9:10                         ` Oliver Neukum
2002-09-12 11:27                         ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-12 13:03                           ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-12 13:44                             ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-13  1:30                               ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-13  2:19                                 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13  6:51                                   ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-13 13:34                                     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 13:52                                       ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-13 14:09                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 14:33                                           ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-13 14:44                                             ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 14:59                                               ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-13 15:17                                                 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 15:27                                                   ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-13 15:37                                                     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16  2:17                                       ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-16 16:13                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 16:36                                         ` Understanding the Principles of Argumentation #3 Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 16:42                                           ` Robinson Maureira Castillo
2002-09-16 17:29                                           ` Cort Dougan
2002-09-16 22:31                                         ` David Woodhouse
2002-10-01 14:13                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 14:27                                           ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-13 15:59                                     ` [RFC] Raceless module interface Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13  3:14                                 ` David Gibson
2002-09-13 10:35                                 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-13 13:53                                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 15:13                                     ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-13 15:30                                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 15:55                                         ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2002-09-13 16:09                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-13 16:39                                         ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-13 17:12                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16  0:24                                         ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-16  1:49                                   ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-16 21:36                                     ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-16 21:48                                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 22:44                                         ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-11 15:28                 ` Question about pseudo filesystems Bill Davidsen
2002-09-11 19:36                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 20:12               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 22:56                 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-10  1:39                   ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-09 20:18               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-10  6:48                 ` Kai Henningsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131740530.8911-100000@serv \
    --to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=phillips@arcor.de \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).