linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, bharrosh@panasas.com,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 2] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_target_io
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:28:57 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1209111349210.23947@file.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120904195156.GE25236@google.com>



On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Kent Overstreet wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:26:19PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 04:41:37PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > > ... or another possibility - start a timer when something is put to 
> > > > current->bio_list and use that timer to pop entries off current->bio_list 
> > > > and submit them to a workqueue. The timer can be cpu-local so only 
> > > > interrupt masking is required to synchronize against the timer.
> > > > 
> > > > This would normally run just like the current kernel and in case of 
> > > > deadlock, the timer would kick in and resolve the deadlock.
> > > 
> > > Ugh. That's a _terrible_ idea.
> > > 
> > > Remember the old plugging code? You ever have to debug performance
> > > issues caused by it?
> > 
> > Yes, I do remember it (and I fixed one bug that resulted in missed unplug 
> > and degraded performance).
> > 
> > But currently, deadlocks due to exhausted mempools and bios being stalled 
> > in current->bio_list don't happen (or do happen below so rarely that they 
> > aren't reported).
> > 
> > If we add a timer, it will turn a deadlock into an i/o delay, but it can't 
> > make things any worse.
> 
> This is all true. I'm not arguing your solution wouldn't _work_... I'd
> try and give some real reasoning for my objections but it'll take me
> awhile to figure out how to coherently explain it and I'm very sleep
> deprived.
> 
> > Currently, dm targets allocate request-specific data from target-specific 
> > mempool. mempools are in dm-crypt, dm-delay, dm-mirror, dm-snapshot, 
> > dm-thin, dm-verity. You can change it to allocate request-specific data 
> > with the bio.
> 
> I wrote a patch for dm_target_io last night. I think I know an easy way
> to go about converting the rest but it'll probably have to wait until
> I'm further along with my immutable bvec stuff.
> 
> Completely untested patch below:

The patch didn't work (it has random allocation failures and crashes when 
the device is closed). The patch also contains some unrelated changes.

I created this patch that does the same thing.

Mikulas

---
Use front pad to allocate dm_target_io

dm_target_io was previously allocated from a mempool. For each
dm_target_io, there is exactly one bio allocated from a bioset.

This patch merges these two allocations into one allocating: we create a
bioset with front_pad equal to the size of dm_target_io - so that every
bio allocated from the bioset has sizeof(struct dm_target_io) bytes
before it. We allocate a bio and use the bytes before the bio as
dm_target_io.

This idea was introdiced by Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

---
 drivers/md/dm.c |   96 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.5.3-fast/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.5.3-fast.orig/drivers/md/dm.c	2012-09-10 16:06:30.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.5.3-fast/drivers/md/dm.c	2012-09-11 19:32:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct dm_target_io {
 	struct dm_io *io;
 	struct dm_target *ti;
 	union map_info info;
+	struct bio clone;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -464,7 +465,9 @@ static void free_io(struct mapped_device
 
 static void free_tio(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_target_io *tio)
 {
-	mempool_free(tio, md->tio_pool);
+	tio->clone.bi_private = md->bs;
+	tio->clone.bi_end_io = NULL;
+	bio_put(&tio->clone);
 }
 
 static struct dm_rq_target_io *alloc_rq_tio(struct mapped_device *md,
@@ -710,13 +713,7 @@ static void clone_endio(struct bio *bio,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Store md for cleanup instead of tio which is about to get freed.
-	 */
-	bio->bi_private = md->bs;
-
 	free_tio(md, tio);
-	bio_put(bio);
 	dec_pending(io, error);
 }
 
@@ -1032,12 +1029,12 @@ int dm_set_target_max_io_len(struct dm_t
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_set_target_max_io_len);
 
-static void __map_bio(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *clone,
-		      struct dm_target_io *tio)
+static void __map_bio(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_target_io *tio)
 {
 	int r;
 	sector_t sector;
 	struct mapped_device *md;
+	struct bio *clone = &tio->clone;
 
 	clone->bi_end_io = clone_endio;
 	clone->bi_private = tio;
@@ -1061,12 +1058,6 @@ static void __map_bio(struct dm_target *
 		/* error the io and bail out, or requeue it if needed */
 		md = tio->io->md;
 		dec_pending(tio->io, r);
-		/*
-		 * Store bio_set for cleanup.
-		 */
-		clone->bi_end_io = NULL;
-		clone->bi_private = md->bs;
-		bio_put(clone);
 		free_tio(md, tio);
 	} else if (r) {
 		DMWARN("unimplemented target map return value: %d", r);
@@ -1094,15 +1085,13 @@ static void dm_bio_destructor(struct bio
 /*
  * Creates a little bio that just does part of a bvec.
  */
-static struct bio *split_bvec(struct bio *bio, sector_t sector,
-			      unsigned short idx, unsigned int offset,
-			      unsigned int len, struct bio_set *bs)
+static void split_bvec(struct dm_target_io *tio, struct bio *bio,
+		       sector_t sector, unsigned short idx, unsigned int offset,
+		       unsigned int len, struct bio_set *bs)
 {
-	struct bio *clone;
+	struct bio *clone = &tio->clone;
 	struct bio_vec *bv = bio->bi_io_vec + idx;
 
-	clone = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOIO, 1, bs);
-	clone->bi_destructor = dm_bio_destructor;
 	*clone->bi_io_vec = *bv;
 
 	clone->bi_sector = sector;
@@ -1119,22 +1108,19 @@ static struct bio *split_bvec(struct bio
 		bio_integrity_trim(clone,
 				   bio_sector_offset(bio, idx, offset), len);
 	}
-
-	return clone;
 }
 
 /*
  * Creates a bio that consists of range of complete bvecs.
  */
-static struct bio *clone_bio(struct bio *bio, sector_t sector,
-			     unsigned short idx, unsigned short bv_count,
-			     unsigned int len, struct bio_set *bs)
+static void clone_bio(struct dm_target_io *tio, struct bio *bio,
+		      sector_t sector, unsigned short idx,
+		      unsigned short bv_count, unsigned int len,
+		      struct bio_set *bs)
 {
-	struct bio *clone;
+	struct bio *clone = &tio->clone;
 
-	clone = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOIO, bio->bi_max_vecs, bs);
 	__bio_clone(clone, bio);
-	clone->bi_destructor = dm_bio_destructor;
 	clone->bi_sector = sector;
 	clone->bi_idx = idx;
 	clone->bi_vcnt = idx + bv_count;
@@ -1148,14 +1134,17 @@ static struct bio *clone_bio(struct bio 
 			bio_integrity_trim(clone,
 					   bio_sector_offset(bio, idx, 0), len);
 	}
-
-	return clone;
 }
 
 static struct dm_target_io *alloc_tio(struct clone_info *ci,
-				      struct dm_target *ti)
+				      struct dm_target *ti, int nr_iovecs)
 {
-	struct dm_target_io *tio = mempool_alloc(ci->md->tio_pool, GFP_NOIO);
+	struct dm_target_io *tio;
+	struct bio *clone;
+
+	clone = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOIO, nr_iovecs, ci->md->bs);
+	tio = container_of(clone, struct dm_target_io, clone);
+	tio->clone.bi_destructor = dm_bio_destructor;
 
 	tio->io = ci->io;
 	tio->ti = ti;
@@ -1167,8 +1156,8 @@ static struct dm_target_io *alloc_tio(st
 static void __issue_target_request(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti,
 				   unsigned request_nr, sector_t len)
 {
-	struct dm_target_io *tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti);
-	struct bio *clone;
+	struct dm_target_io *tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti, ci->bio->bi_max_vecs);
+	struct bio *clone = &tio->clone;
 
 	tio->info.target_request_nr = request_nr;
 
@@ -1177,15 +1166,13 @@ static void __issue_target_request(struc
 	 * ci->bio->bi_max_vecs is BIO_INLINE_VECS anyway, for both flush
 	 * and discard, so no need for concern about wasted bvec allocations.
 	 */
-	clone = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOIO, ci->bio->bi_max_vecs, ci->md->bs);
 	__bio_clone(clone, ci->bio);
-	clone->bi_destructor = dm_bio_destructor;
 	if (len) {
 		clone->bi_sector = ci->sector;
 		clone->bi_size = to_bytes(len);
 	}
 
-	__map_bio(ti, clone, tio);
+	__map_bio(ti, tio);
 }
 
 static void __issue_target_requests(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti,
@@ -1214,14 +1201,13 @@ static int __clone_and_map_empty_flush(s
  */
 static void __clone_and_map_simple(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti)
 {
-	struct bio *clone, *bio = ci->bio;
+	struct bio *bio = ci->bio;
 	struct dm_target_io *tio;
 
-	tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti);
-	clone = clone_bio(bio, ci->sector, ci->idx,
-			  bio->bi_vcnt - ci->idx, ci->sector_count,
-			  ci->md->bs);
-	__map_bio(ti, clone, tio);
+	tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti, bio->bi_max_vecs);
+	clone_bio(tio, bio, ci->sector, ci->idx, bio->bi_vcnt - ci->idx,
+		  ci->sector_count, ci->md->bs);
+	__map_bio(ti, tio);
 	ci->sector_count = 0;
 }
 
@@ -1259,7 +1245,7 @@ static int __clone_and_map_discard(struc
 
 static int __clone_and_map(struct clone_info *ci)
 {
-	struct bio *clone, *bio = ci->bio;
+	struct bio *bio = ci->bio;
 	struct dm_target *ti;
 	sector_t len = 0, max;
 	struct dm_target_io *tio;
@@ -1299,10 +1285,10 @@ static int __clone_and_map(struct clone_
 			len += bv_len;
 		}
 
-		tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti);
-		clone = clone_bio(bio, ci->sector, ci->idx, i - ci->idx, len,
-				  ci->md->bs);
-		__map_bio(ti, clone, tio);
+		tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti, bio->bi_max_vecs);
+		clone_bio(tio, bio, ci->sector, ci->idx, i - ci->idx, len,
+			  ci->md->bs);
+		__map_bio(ti, tio);
 
 		ci->sector += len;
 		ci->sector_count -= len;
@@ -1327,12 +1313,11 @@ static int __clone_and_map(struct clone_
 
 			len = min(remaining, max);
 
-			tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti);
-			clone = split_bvec(bio, ci->sector, ci->idx,
-					   bv->bv_offset + offset, len,
-					   ci->md->bs);
+			tio = alloc_tio(ci, ti, 1);
+			split_bvec(tio, bio, ci->sector, ci->idx,
+				   bv->bv_offset + offset, len, ci->md->bs);
 
-			__map_bio(ti, clone, tio);
+			__map_bio(ti, tio);
 
 			ci->sector += len;
 			ci->sector_count -= len;
@@ -2765,7 +2750,8 @@ struct dm_md_mempools *dm_alloc_md_mempo
 	if (!pools->tio_pool)
 		goto free_io_pool_and_out;
 
-	pools->bs = bioset_create(pool_size, 0);
+	pools->bs = bioset_create(pool_size, (type == DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED) ?
+		offsetof(struct dm_target_io, clone) : 0);
 	if (!pools->bs)
 		goto free_tio_pool_and_out;
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-11 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 17:37 [PATCH v7 0/9] Block cleanups, deadlock fix Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] block: Generalized bio pool freeing Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] block: Add bio_reset() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 20:31   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 22:17     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 22:53       ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-01  2:23       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 20:13         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 20:32   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 22:24     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04  9:05     ` Jiri Kosina
2012-09-05 19:44       ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] block: Kill bi_destructor Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 20:36   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 22:07     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] block: Consolidate bio_alloc_bioset(), bio_kmalloc() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 20:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 22:03     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-01  2:17       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] block: Add bio_clone_bioset(), bio_clone_kmalloc() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 20:44   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 22:05     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-01  2:19       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] block: Reorder struct bio_set Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 20:49   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 22:28     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 23:01       ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-29  1:31         ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-29  3:25           ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-29 12:57             ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-29 14:39               ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-29 16:26                 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-29 21:01                   ` John Stoffel
2012-08-29 21:08                     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-28 22:06   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-28 22:23     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-29 16:24   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-29 16:50     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-29 16:57       ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-29 17:07       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-29 17:13         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-29 17:23           ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-29 17:32             ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-30 22:07           ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-31  1:43             ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-31  1:55               ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-31 15:01               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-03  1:26                 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-03 20:41               ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-04  3:41                 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 18:55                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-04 19:01                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-04 19:43                       ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 19:42                     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 21:03                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-04 19:26                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-04 19:39                     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-04 19:51                     ` [PATCH] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_target_io Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 21:20                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-11 19:28                       ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2012-09-11 19:50                         ` [PATCH 2] " Kent Overstreet
2012-09-12 22:31                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-14 23:09                             ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-09-01  2:13             ` [PATCH v7 9/9] block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers Tejun Heo
2012-09-03  1:34               ` [PATCH v2] " Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 15:00               ` [PATCH v7 9/9] " Vivek Goyal
2012-09-03  0:49             ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-03  1:17               ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 13:54               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-04 18:26                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05  3:57                   ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-05  4:37                     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1209111349210.23947@file.rdu.redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).