linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	seanjc@google.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 23:08:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgGmgMMR0dBmjW86@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204115718.14934-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 06:56:55AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The TDP MMU has a performance regression compared to the legacy
> MMU when CR0 changes often.  This was reported for the grsecurity
> kernel, which uses CR0.WP to implement kernel W^X.  In that case,
> each change to CR0.WP unloads the MMU and causes a lot of unnecessary
> work.  When running nested, this can even cause the L1 to hardly
> make progress, as the L0 hypervisor it is overwhelmed by the amount
> of MMU work that is needed.
> 
> The root cause of the issue is that the "MMU role" in KVM is a mess
> that mixes the CPU setup (CR0/CR4/EFER, SMM, guest mode, etc.)
> and the shadow page table format.  Whenever something is different
> between the MMU and the CPU, it is stored as an extra field in struct
> kvm_mmu---and for extra bonus complication, sometimes the same thing
> is stored in both the role and an extra field.
> 
> So, this is the "no functional change intended" part of the changes
> required to fix the performance regression.  It separates neatly
> the shadow page table format ("MMU role") from the guest page table
> format ("CPU role"), and removes the duplicate fields.

What do you think about calling this the guest_role instead of cpu_role?
There is a bit of a precedent for using "guest" instead of "cpu" already
for this type of concept (e.g. guest_walker), and I find it more
intuitive.

> The next
> step then is to avoid unloading the MMU as long as the MMU role
> stays the same.
> 
> Please review!
> 
> Paolo
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (23):
>   KVM: MMU: pass uses_nx directly to reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask
>   KVM: MMU: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM
>   KVM: MMU: remove valid from extended role
>   KVM: MMU: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs
>   KVM: MMU: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu
>   KVM: MMU: load new PGD once nested two-dimensional paging is
>     initialized
>   KVM: MMU: remove kvm_mmu_calc_root_page_role
>   KVM: MMU: rephrase unclear comment
>   KVM: MMU: remove "bool base_only" arguments
>   KVM: MMU: split cpu_role from mmu_role
>   KVM: MMU: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs
>   KVM: MMU: remove ept_ad field
>   KVM: MMU: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common
>   KVM: MMU: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging
>   KVM: MMU: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging
>   KVM: MMU: remove extended bits from mmu_role
>   KVM: MMU: remove redundant bits from extended role
>   KVM: MMU: fetch shadow EFER.NX from MMU role
>   KVM: MMU: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles
>   KVM: MMU: pull CPU role computation to kvm_init_mmu
>   KVM: MMU: store shadow_root_level into mmu_role
>   KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level
>   KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  13 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h              |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 408 ++++++++++++--------------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c    |   6 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h  |  12 +-
>  arch/86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  12 +-
>  10 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 284 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 11:56 [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 01/23] KVM: MMU: pass uses_nx directly to reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 17:59   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 16:09       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-07 21:50         ` David Matlack
2022-02-10  0:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 16:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 02/23] KVM: MMU: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:16   ` David Matlack
2022-02-09 22:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 03/23] KVM: MMU: remove valid from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:32   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 22:54   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10  9:53     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 04/23] KVM: MMU: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:41   ` David Matlack
2022-02-09 22:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/23] KVM: MMU: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:45   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/23] KVM: MMU: load new PGD once nested two-dimensional paging is initialized Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:18   ` David Matlack
2022-02-07 13:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 14:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 12:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/23] KVM: MMU: remove kvm_mmu_calc_root_page_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:32   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10  0:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10  9:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 17:29       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 17:43         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/23] KVM: MMU: rephrase unclear comment Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:38   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/23] KVM: MMU: remove "bool base_only" arguments Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:41   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/23] KVM: MMU: split cpu_role from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 21:57   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 21:38       ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 11/23] KVM: MMU: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 22:10   ` David Matlack
2022-02-07 22:17     ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 12/23] KVM: MMU: remove ept_ad field Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 13/23] KVM: MMU: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 22:25   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 14/23] KVM: MMU: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 15/23] KVM: MMU: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 16/23] KVM: MMU: remove extended bits from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 17/23] KVM: MMU: remove redundant bits from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 18/23] KVM: MMU: fetch shadow EFER.NX from MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 19/23] KVM: MMU: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 20/23] KVM: MMU: pull CPU role computation to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 22:42   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 21/23] KVM: MMU: store shadow_root_level into mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 23:00   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 23:01   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 23:02   ` David Matlack
2022-02-07 23:08 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-02-07 23:27   ` [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring Sean Christopherson
2022-02-07 23:53     ` David Matlack
2022-02-10  1:11       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 11:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 16:55           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 17:30             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 19:28               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-09 22:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10  9:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-14 18:14   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgGmgMMR0dBmjW86@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).