linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>,
	Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ppc: bpf/jit: A few cleanups
Date: Tue,  7 Jun 2016 19:02:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb61773bf6fe65c5e0715f51fe47927581e88461.1465304785.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1465304785.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1465304785.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

1. Per the ISA, ADDIS actually uses RT, rather than RS. Though
the result is the same, make the usage clear.
2. The multiply instruction used is a 32-bit multiply. Rename PPC_MUL()
to PPC_MULW() to make the same clear.
3. PPC_STW[U] take the entire 16-bit immediate value and do not require
word-alignment, per the ISA. Change the macros to use IMM_L().
4. A few white-space cleanups to satisfy checkpatch.pl.

Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h      | 13 +++++++------
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 95d0e38..9041d3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
  */
 #define IMM_H(i)		((uintptr_t)(i)>>16)
 #define IMM_HA(i)		(((uintptr_t)(i)>>16) +			      \
-				 (((uintptr_t)(i) & 0x8000) >> 15))
+					(((uintptr_t)(i) & 0x8000) >> 15))
 #define IMM_L(i)		((uintptr_t)(i) & 0xffff)
 
 #define PLANT_INSTR(d, idx, instr)					      \
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 #define PPC_MR(d, a)		PPC_OR(d, a, a)
 #define PPC_LI(r, i)		PPC_ADDI(r, 0, i)
 #define PPC_ADDIS(d, a, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_ADDIS |			      \
-				     ___PPC_RS(d) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
+				     ___PPC_RT(d) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_LIS(r, i)		PPC_ADDIS(r, 0, i)
 #define PPC_STD(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STD | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
 #define PPC_STDU(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
 #define PPC_STW(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STW | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
-				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_STWU(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STWU | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
-				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
 
 #define PPC_LBZ(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_LBZ | ___PPC_RT(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 #define PPC_CMPWI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPDI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
-#define PPC_CMPLW(a, b)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLW | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
+#define PPC_CMPLW(a, b)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLW | ___PPC_RA(a) |	      \
+					___PPC_RB(b))
 
 #define PPC_SUB(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_SUB | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RB(a) | ___PPC_RA(b))
 #define PPC_ADD(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_ADD | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
-#define PPC_MUL(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_MULLW | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
+#define PPC_MULW(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_MULLW | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
 #define PPC_MULHWU(d, a, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_MULHWU | ___PPC_RT(d) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 2d66a84..6012aac 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -161,14 +161,14 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X: /* A *= X; */
 			ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
-			PPC_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_X);
+			PPC_MULW(r_A, r_A, r_X);
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K: /* A *= K */
 			if (K < 32768)
 				PPC_MULI(r_A, r_A, K);
 			else {
 				PPC_LI32(r_scratch1, K);
-				PPC_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
+				PPC_MULW(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
 			}
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: /* A %= X; */
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			}
 			if (code == (BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X)) {
 				PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_X);
-				PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_X, r_scratch1);
+				PPC_MULW(r_scratch1, r_X, r_scratch1);
 				PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
 			} else {
 				PPC_DIVWU(r_A, r_A, r_X);
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: /* A %= K; */
 			PPC_LI32(r_scratch2, K);
 			PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_scratch2);
-			PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_scratch2, r_scratch1);
+			PPC_MULW(r_scratch1, r_scratch2, r_scratch1);
 			PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
 			break;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K: /* A /= K */
-- 
2.8.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-07 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-07 13:32 [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Fix/enhance 32-bit Load Immediate implementation Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Optimize 64-bit Immediate loads Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Introduce rotate immediate instructions Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-07 13:32 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2016-06-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Isolate classic BPF JIT specifics into a separate header Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] ppc: ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-07 22:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-06-08 17:17     ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-09  3:19   ` Nilay Vaish
2016-06-09  6:07     ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-17 12:53   ` [6/6] " Michael Ellerman
2016-06-17 13:00     ` [PATCH] ppc: Fix BPF JIT for ABIv2 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-06-19 17:49       ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-20 18:56         ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-06-21  8:58           ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-21 11:15             ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-21 14:47               ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-06-21 15:45                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-06-22  4:06                   ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-22  7:12                 ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 14:57                   ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22  5:20             ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-22  5:18       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-19 17:36     ` [6/6] ppc: ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-20 23:38       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-21  6:58         ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-21 11:04           ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-22  7:06             ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 10:37   ` [PATCH 6/6] " Michael Ellerman
2016-06-22 12:32     ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-11  5:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 David Miller
2016-06-13  5:40   ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-18  4:57     ` mpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb61773bf6fe65c5e0715f51fe47927581e88461.1465304785.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kda@linux-powerpc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).