From: Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>,
gbastien+lttng <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>,
diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:42:01 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200428184201.G6wKZ8TuMEljDlcPOLNqAhYX8hXIDzrnAaW5AT6H74w@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423205226.496-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam" <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" <jgalar@efficios.com>
> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25
> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> ---
> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md
> b/common-trace-format-specification.md
> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644
> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md
> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md
> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata):
> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps
> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the
> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end
> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream.
> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the
> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the
"greater than or equal to"
> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same
> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to
> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet
"less than or equal to"
Phil
> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream
> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that
> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in
> --
> 2.11.0
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 20:52 [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3) Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 22:51 ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev [this message]
2020-04-28 18:42 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gbastien+lttng@versatic.net \
--cc=jgalar@efficios.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=pproulx@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).