From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> To: Philippe Proulx <pproulx@efficios.com> Cc: Diamon discuss <diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>, Genevieve Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam" >> <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>, >> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" >> <jgalar@efficios.com> >> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25 >> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin > >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> --- >> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644 >> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata): >> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps >> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the >> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end >> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream. >> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the >> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the > > "greater than or equal to" done > >> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same >> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to >> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet > > "less than or equal to" done, Thanks! Mathieu > > Phil > >> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream >> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that >> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in >> -- > > 2.11.0 -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> To: Philippe Proulx <pproulx@efficios.com> Cc: Diamon discuss <diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>, Genevieve Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net> Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20200428185445.kQa98SdG8tjzT5C511MXyTgbTQcBj8AGYEw6Kok1cAM@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam" >> <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>, >> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" >> <jgalar@efficios.com> >> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25 >> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin > >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> --- >> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644 >> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata): >> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps >> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the >> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end >> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream. >> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the >> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the > > "greater than or equal to" done > >> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same >> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to >> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet > > "less than or equal to" done, Thanks! Mathieu > > Phil > >> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream >> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that >> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in >> -- > > 2.11.0 -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 18:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-23 20:52 [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3) Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 22:51 ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev 2020-04-24 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-24 14:05 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:40 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:40 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:51 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 12:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 12:08 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 16:50 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 16:50 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:42 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:42 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev [this message] 2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \ --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \ --cc=diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=gbastien+lttng@versatic.net \ --cc=jgalar@efficios.com \ --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \ --cc=pproulx@efficios.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).