netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 01/10] genetlink: don't merge dumpit split op for different cmds into single iter
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:47:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011094702.06ace023@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZSaGiSKL5/ocFYOE@nanopsycho>

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:27:05 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Yeah, we need fixes semantics written down somewhere.
> >I can do it, sure.  
> 
> I found 2 mentions that relate to netdev regarging Fixes:
> 
> Quoting Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
> If your patch fixes a bug in a specific commit, e.g. you found an issue using
> ``git bisect``, please use the 'Fixes:' tag with the first 12 characters of
> the SHA-1 ID, and the one line summary. 
> 
> Quoting Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst:
>  - for fixes the ``Fixes:`` tag is required, regardless of the tree
> 
> This patch fixes a bug, sure, bug is not hit by existing code, but still
> it is present.
> 
> Why it is wrong to put "Fixes" in this case?
> Could you please document this?

I think you're asking me to document what a bug is because the existing
doc clearly says Fixes is for bugs. If the code does not misbehave,
there is no bug.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-10 11:08 [patch net-next 00/10] devlink: finish conversion to generated split_ops Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 01/10] genetlink: don't merge dumpit split op for different cmds into single iter Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:24   ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 11:39     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 12:09       ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 12:12   ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 18:48   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11  6:08     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 11:27       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 16:47         ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-10-11 17:00           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-12 20:58           ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 02/10] tools: ynl-gen: introduce support for bitfield32 attribute type Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:11   ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 18:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11  6:07     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 16:52       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 17:04         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 18:25           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-12  9:28             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-12 21:06               ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-13  0:15                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-13 18:49                   ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-13  0:25               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-10 19:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11  6:06     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 03/10] netlink: specs: devlink: remove reload-action from devlink-get cmd reply Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 04/10] netlink: specs: devlink: make dont-validate single line Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 05/10] netlink: specs: devlink: fix reply command values Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 18:59   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11  6:04     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 16:44       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 17:00         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 06/10] devlink: make devlink_flash_overwrite enum named one Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 07/10] devlink: rename netlink callback to be aligned with the generated ones Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 08/10] netlink: specs: devlink: add the remaining command to generate complete split_ops Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 09/10] devlink: remove duplicated netlink callback prototypes Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:18 ` [patch net-next 10/10] devlink: remove netlink small_ops Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231011094702.06ace023@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).