From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 01/10] genetlink: don't merge dumpit split op for different cmds into single iter
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:27:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSaGiSKL5/ocFYOE@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZSY7+b5qQhKgzXo5@nanopsycho>
Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 08:08:57AM CEST, jiri@resnulli.us wrote:
>Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:48:45PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:08:20 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fixes: b8fd60c36a44 ("genetlink: allow families to use split ops directly")
>>
>>Drop Fixes, add "currently no family declares ops which could trigger
>>this issue".
>
>Yeah, we need fixes semantics written down somewhere.
>I can do it, sure.
I found 2 mentions that relate to netdev regarging Fixes:
Quoting Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
If your patch fixes a bug in a specific commit, e.g. you found an issue using
``git bisect``, please use the 'Fixes:' tag with the first 12 characters of
the SHA-1 ID, and the one line summary.
Quoting Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst:
- for fixes the ``Fixes:`` tag is required, regardless of the tree
This patch fixes a bug, sure, bug is not hit by existing code, but still
it is present.
Why it is wrong to put "Fixes" in this case?
Could you please document this?
>
>
>>
>>> if (i + cnt < family->n_split_ops &&
>>> - family->split_ops[i + cnt].flags & GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP) {
>>> + family->split_ops[i + cnt].flags & GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP &&
>>> + (!cnt ||
>>> + (cnt && family->split_ops[i + cnt].cmd == iter->doit.cmd))) {
>>
>>Why are you checking cnt? if do was not found cmd will be 0, which
>>cannot mis-match.
>
>Correct. Will remove cnt check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 11:08 [patch net-next 00/10] devlink: finish conversion to generated split_ops Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 01/10] genetlink: don't merge dumpit split op for different cmds into single iter Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:24 ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 11:39 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 12:09 ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 12:12 ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 18:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 6:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 11:27 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-10-11 16:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 17:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-12 20:58 ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 02/10] tools: ynl-gen: introduce support for bitfield32 attribute type Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:11 ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-10 18:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 6:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 16:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 17:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 18:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-12 9:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-12 21:06 ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-13 0:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-13 18:49 ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-13 0:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-10 19:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 6:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 03/10] netlink: specs: devlink: remove reload-action from devlink-get cmd reply Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 04/10] netlink: specs: devlink: make dont-validate single line Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 05/10] netlink: specs: devlink: fix reply command values Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 18:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 6:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 16:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 17:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 06/10] devlink: make devlink_flash_overwrite enum named one Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 07/10] devlink: rename netlink callback to be aligned with the generated ones Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 08/10] netlink: specs: devlink: add the remaining command to generate complete split_ops Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:08 ` [patch net-next 09/10] devlink: remove duplicated netlink callback prototypes Jiri Pirko
2023-10-10 11:18 ` [patch net-next 10/10] devlink: remove netlink small_ops Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSaGiSKL5/ocFYOE@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).