Re: [PATCH 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: add two timing delay property

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: "Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜)" <Xiangsheng.Hou@mediatek.com>,
	"miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org"
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"gch981213@gmail.com" <gch981213@gmail.com>,
	"vigneshr@ti.com" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Benliang Zhao (赵本亮)" <Benliang.Zhao@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Bin Zhang (章斌)" <bin.zhang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: add two timing delay property
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:47:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08ebc76a-0220-f984-b546-23dba8677be9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f83184ae803dbe0afd37a31a8a83a369a9772880.camel@mediatek.com>

On 29/11/2022 03:50, Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜) wrote:

>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
>>> snfi.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
>>> snfi.yaml
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,22 @@ properties:
>>>      description: device-tree node of the accompanying ECC engine.
>>>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>  
>>> +  rx-sample-delay:
>>
>> No, use existing property, don't invent your own stuff - missing unit
>> suffix. See spi-peripheral-props.yaml.
> Will change to other private property. The read sample delay with
> MediaTek SPI NAND controller can be set with values from 0 to 47.
> However, it`s difficult to say the unit of each vaule, because the unit
> value will be difference with different chip process or different
> corner IC.

Why you cannot use same formula as other SPI drivers for sample-delay?
And divide/multiple by some factor specific to SoC, which is taken from
driver_data?

> 
>>> +    description: Rx delay to sample data with this value, the
>>> valid
>>> +                 values are from 0 to 47. The delay is smaller
>>> than
>>> +                 the rx-latch-latency.
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>
>> Drop $ref.
> Will do.
> 
>>
>>> +    minItems: 0
>>> +    maxItems: 47
>>> +    default: 0
>>> +
>>> +  rx-latch-latency:
>>
>> Same problems. Did you check spi-peripheral-props.yaml or other SPI
>> controller schemas for such property?
>>
>>> +    description: Rx delay to sample data with this value, the
>>> value
>>> +                 unit is clock cycle.
>>
>> I think the unit should be rather time (e.g. us).
>>
> Yes, I checked the spi-peripheral-props.yaml and the delay values are
> described exactly unit with ns or us. However the unit of MediaTek read
> latch latency is clock cycle and it`s difference with different clock
> frequency.

This is fine in such case.

> 
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +    enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
>>> +    default: 0
>>> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof