From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> To: <samuel@sholland.org>, <wens@csie.org>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Cc: <arnd@arndb.de>, <hdegoede@redhat.com>, <icenowy@aosc.io>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <mripard@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Fixes and D1 support Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 06:58:00 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <095cb5ca-3e63-50b0-f604-4c8c226f67e0@microchip.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220815041248.53268-1-samuel@sholland.org> Hey Samuel, On 15/08/2022 05:12, Samuel Holland wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > This series cleans up a few issues in the system controller driver, and > then expands the exported regmap to support one of the pairs of LDOs > built in to the D1 SoC. > > Eventually, we will need to update the SRAM region claiming API so > ownership can be swapped back and forth by consumer drivers. This will > be necessary for uploading firmware to the R329/D1 DSPs, but it is not > needed for initial bringup. I tried this series on top of both 6.0-rc1 & next, but I saw a shed load of errors from dtbs_check. I'll take a look at the rest of the series later on, but just FYI. I know I have seen patches going into different subsystems so I assume you're working on it. However, it would be nice to let us what all the dependencies for this series are dt-binding wise in the cover letter. I have been trying to get riscv down to 0 warnings and would not be in favour of accepting patches that go in the other direction. (This patchset currently produces about 75 warnings) Thanks, Conor. > > Changes in v2: > - New patch to first clean up the binding > > Samuel Holland (10): > dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Clean up the compatible lists > dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Add D1 compatible string > soc: sunxi: sram: Actually claim SRAM regions > soc: sunxi: sram: Prevent the driver from being unbound > soc: sunxi: sram: Fix probe function ordering issues > soc: sunxi: sram: Fix debugfs info for A64 SRAM C > soc: sunxi: sram: Return void from the release function > soc: sunxi: sram: Save a pointer to the OF match data > soc: sunxi: sram: Export the LDO control register > soc: sunxi: sram: Add support for the D1 system control > > .../allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml | 82 ++++++++----------- > drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c | 74 +++++++++-------- > include/linux/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.35.1 >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> To: <samuel@sholland.org>, <wens@csie.org>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Cc: <arnd@arndb.de>, <hdegoede@redhat.com>, <icenowy@aosc.io>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <mripard@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Fixes and D1 support Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 06:58:00 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <095cb5ca-3e63-50b0-f604-4c8c226f67e0@microchip.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220815041248.53268-1-samuel@sholland.org> Hey Samuel, On 15/08/2022 05:12, Samuel Holland wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > This series cleans up a few issues in the system controller driver, and > then expands the exported regmap to support one of the pairs of LDOs > built in to the D1 SoC. > > Eventually, we will need to update the SRAM region claiming API so > ownership can be swapped back and forth by consumer drivers. This will > be necessary for uploading firmware to the R329/D1 DSPs, but it is not > needed for initial bringup. I tried this series on top of both 6.0-rc1 & next, but I saw a shed load of errors from dtbs_check. I'll take a look at the rest of the series later on, but just FYI. I know I have seen patches going into different subsystems so I assume you're working on it. However, it would be nice to let us what all the dependencies for this series are dt-binding wise in the cover letter. I have been trying to get riscv down to 0 warnings and would not be in favour of accepting patches that go in the other direction. (This patchset currently produces about 75 warnings) Thanks, Conor. > > Changes in v2: > - New patch to first clean up the binding > > Samuel Holland (10): > dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Clean up the compatible lists > dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Add D1 compatible string > soc: sunxi: sram: Actually claim SRAM regions > soc: sunxi: sram: Prevent the driver from being unbound > soc: sunxi: sram: Fix probe function ordering issues > soc: sunxi: sram: Fix debugfs info for A64 SRAM C > soc: sunxi: sram: Return void from the release function > soc: sunxi: sram: Save a pointer to the OF match data > soc: sunxi: sram: Export the LDO control register > soc: sunxi: sram: Add support for the D1 system control > > .../allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml | 82 ++++++++----------- > drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c | 74 +++++++++-------- > include/linux/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.35.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 6:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-15 4:12 [PATCH v2 00/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Fixes and D1 support Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Clean up the compatible lists Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 12:15 ` Andre Przywara 2022-08-15 12:15 ` Andre Przywara 2022-08-15 13:54 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 13:54 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-16 5:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-08-16 5:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Add D1 compatible string Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 13:55 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 13:55 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-16 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-08-16 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Actually claim SRAM regions Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 13:56 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 13:56 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Prevent the driver from being unbound Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 14:00 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 14:00 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Fix probe function ordering issues Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 14:06 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 14:06 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-16 0:05 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-16 0:05 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Fix debugfs info for A64 SRAM C Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Return void from the release function Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 14:09 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 14:09 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Save a pointer to the OF match data Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 14:10 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 14:10 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Export the LDO control register Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 14:13 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 14:13 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Add support for the D1 system control Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 4:12 ` Samuel Holland 2022-08-15 14:14 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 14:14 ` Heiko Stübner 2022-08-15 6:58 ` Conor.Dooley [this message] 2022-08-15 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] soc: sunxi: sram: Fixes and D1 support Conor.Dooley 2022-08-15 6:59 ` Conor.Dooley 2022-08-15 6:59 ` Conor.Dooley 2022-09-18 21:49 ` Jernej Škrabec 2022-09-18 21:49 ` Jernej Škrabec
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=095cb5ca-3e63-50b0-f604-4c8c226f67e0@microchip.com \ --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \ --cc=icenowy@aosc.io \ --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=mripard@kernel.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=samuel@sholland.org \ --cc=wens@csie.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.