From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, khilman@ti.com, rnayak@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during suspend Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:37:06 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1342773426.4672.173.camel@sokoban> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207191726090.14390@utopia.booyaka.com> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 17:30 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during > > suspend > > > > Currently OMAP4 suspend puts all power domains to CSWR. OSWR is a deeper > > state that saves more power, but has higher latencies also. As suspend > > is considered a high-latency operation, OSWR is appropriate here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> > > --- > > > > I'll update this to next rev if one is requested. > > No need, I'll add it in the local copy here. Thanks, thats what I thought. :) > > > (Kind of hoping this set would be reaching maturity already.) > > It kind of looks to me like there are two or three separate sets within > the series. My feeling is that Kevin should take the first two, then I > should take the rest other than 6 and 7. Then once those are queued, > we can pull in 6 and 7. Does that make sense to you? Yea, that looks good to me. Patches up from 6+ should only be pulled once the pre-reqs for this set are in also (io-chain + Jean's func pwrst stuff.) I haven't actually tried these patches without the pre-reqs lately, but I think they should be fine. -Tero
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during suspend Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:37:06 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1342773426.4672.173.camel@sokoban> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207191726090.14390@utopia.booyaka.com> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 17:30 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during > > suspend > > > > Currently OMAP4 suspend puts all power domains to CSWR. OSWR is a deeper > > state that saves more power, but has higher latencies also. As suspend > > is considered a high-latency operation, OSWR is appropriate here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> > > --- > > > > I'll update this to next rev if one is requested. > > No need, I'll add it in the local copy here. Thanks, thats what I thought. :) > > > (Kind of hoping this set would be reaching maturity already.) > > It kind of looks to me like there are two or three separate sets within > the series. My feeling is that Kevin should take the first two, then I > should take the rest other than 6 and 7. Then once those are queued, > we can pull in 6 and 7. Does that make sense to you? Yea, that looks good to me. Patches up from 6+ should only be pulled once the pre-reqs for this set are in also (io-chain + Jean's func pwrst stuff.) I haven't actually tried these patches without the pre-reqs lately, but I think they should be fine. -Tero
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 8:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-07-19 13:26 [PATCHv7 00/12] ARM: OMAP4: core retention support Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 01/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: add errata support Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 02/12] ARM: OMAP4460: Workaround for ROM bug because of CA9 r2pX GIC control register change Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 03/12] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod: flag hwmods/modules not supporting module level context status Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-09-12 19:46 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 19:46 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 04/12] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Add support for per hwmod/module context lost count Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-09-12 19:48 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 19:48 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 21:29 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 21:29 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-21 0:38 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-21 0:38 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 05/12] ARM: OMAP4: pwrdm: add support for reading prev logic and mem states Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-09-12 19:50 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 19:50 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 06/12] ARM: OMAP4: suspend: Program all domains to retention Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 14:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2012-07-19 14:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov 2012-08-06 13:29 ` Jean Pihet 2012-08-06 13:29 ` Jean Pihet 2012-09-12 21:36 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-12 21:36 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during suspend Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 14:44 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 14:44 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 15:31 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 15:31 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 23:30 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 23:30 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-20 8:37 ` Tero Kristo [this message] 2012-07-20 8:37 ` Tero Kristo 2012-09-12 23:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-12 23:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-13 7:40 ` Tero Kristo 2012-09-13 7:40 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 08/12] ARM: OMAP4430: PM: Work-around for ROM code BUG of PER pwrst ctrl Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 23:21 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 23:21 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-20 9:20 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-20 9:20 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-20 13:25 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-20 13:25 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 09/12] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod data: temporarily comment out data for the sl2if IP block Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-23 18:38 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-23 18:38 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 10/12] ARM: OMAP4: HWMOD: add support for lostcontext_mask Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-09-12 19:52 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 19:52 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 11/12] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod_data: add context lose information for l4_abe hwmod Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` [PATCHv7 12/12] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod: update context lost counter logic for hwmods without context reg Tero Kristo 2012-07-19 13:26 ` Tero Kristo
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1342773426.4672.173.camel@sokoban \ --to=t-kristo@ti.com \ --cc=khilman@ti.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nm@ti.com \ --cc=paul@pwsan.com \ --cc=rnayak@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.