From: "Woodhouse, David" <david.woodhouse@intel.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359703995.23531.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130201011712.GF23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 01:17 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > I've tried both gcc 4.6.3 [1] and 4.6.4 [2]. If you can point me to
> > a 4.5.x, I'll try that, too, but as it stands now, if one moves the
> > code added to swab.h below outside of its armv6 protection,
> > gcc adds calls to __bswapsi2.
>
> Take a look at the message I sent on the 29th towards the beginning of
> this thread for details of gcc 4.5.4 behaviour.
I'd like to see a comment (with PR# if appropriate) explaining clearly
*why* it isn't enabled for <ARMv6 even with a bleeding-edge compiler.
Russell's test also seemed to indicate that the 32-bit and 64-bit swap
support was present and functional in GCC 4.5.4 (as indeed it should
have been since 4.4), so I'm still not quite sure why you require 4.6
for that.
--
Sent with MeeGo's ActiveSync support.
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 4370 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: david.woodhouse@intel.com (Woodhouse, David)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359703995.23531.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130201011712.GF23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 01:17 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > I've tried both gcc 4.6.3 [1] and 4.6.4 [2]. If you can point me to
> > a 4.5.x, I'll try that, too, but as it stands now, if one moves the
> > code added to swab.h below outside of its armv6 protection,
> > gcc adds calls to __bswapsi2.
>
> Take a look at the message I sent on the 29th towards the beginning of
> this thread for details of gcc 4.5.4 behaviour.
I'd like to see a comment (with PR# if appropriate) explaining clearly
*why* it isn't enabled for <ARMv6 even with a bleeding-edge compiler.
Russell's test also seemed to indicate that the 32-bit and 64-bit swap
support was present and functional in GCC 4.5.4 (as indeed it should
have been since 4.4), so I'm still not quite sure why you require 4.6
for that.
--
Sent with MeeGo's ActiveSync support.
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4370 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130201/d2606b09/attachment-0001.bin>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 1:30 [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function Kim Phillips
2013-01-29 1:30 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-29 8:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 8:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 16:46 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 16:46 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 17:55 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 17:55 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 18:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 18:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 10:22 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-30 10:22 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-31 2:09 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-31 2:09 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-31 6:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 6:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 9:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 9:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 20:59 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-31 20:59 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-31 21:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 21:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 22:11 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-31 22:11 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-01 0:37 ` [PATCH v4] " Kim Phillips
2013-02-01 0:37 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-01 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 1:17 ` [RFC] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 1:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 7:33 ` Woodhouse, David [this message]
2013-02-01 7:33 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-06 3:04 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-06 3:04 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-06 9:02 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-06 9:02 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-07 1:19 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-07 1:19 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-07 10:19 ` Will Newton
2013-02-07 10:19 ` Will Newton
2013-02-07 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-07 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-07 18:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-07 18:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-08 17:25 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-08 17:25 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-08 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-08 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-08 22:40 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-08 22:40 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-08 22:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-08 22:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-09 1:12 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-09 1:12 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-09 3:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-09 3:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 2:31 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-20 2:31 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-20 2:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-02-20 2:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-02-20 3:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 3:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 10:38 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 10:38 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 13:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 13:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 13:44 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 13:44 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 14:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 14:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 14:53 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 14:53 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 15:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 15:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 3:49 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 3:49 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 4:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 4:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 6:52 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 6:52 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 16:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 16:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-22 2:33 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-22 2:33 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-22 3:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-22 3:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-23 1:40 ` [PATCH v6] " Kim Phillips
2013-02-23 1:40 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-23 2:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-23 2:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-23 23:20 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-23 23:20 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-05-23 16:46 ` [PATCH v7] " Kim Phillips
2013-05-23 16:46 ` Kim Phillips
2013-05-23 20:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-23 20:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-23 23:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 23:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-06 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-06 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-06 22:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 22:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-07 0:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-07 0:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-26 5:38 ` Dirk Behme
2013-05-26 9:30 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-10-27 2:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-10-27 2:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-05 21:45 ` Kim Phillips
2013-11-05 21:45 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 16:37 ` [RFC] " Woodhouse, David
2013-02-21 16:37 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-21 17:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 17:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-13 13:35 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-03-13 13:35 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-29 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-29 14:43 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 14:43 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 14:53 ` Rob Herring
2013-01-29 14:53 ` Rob Herring
2013-01-29 15:10 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 15:10 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-31 11:44 Woodhouse, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359703995.23531.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
--to=david.woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.