All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Use new frontbuffer bits to increase pll clock
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:51:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402941095-27879-14-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402941095-27879-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The downclocking checks a few more things, so not that simple to
convert. Also, this should get unified with the drrs handling and also
use the locking of that. Otoh the drrs locking is about as hapzardous
as no locking, at least on first sight.

For easier conversion ditch the upclocking on unload - we'll turn off
everything anyway.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 32 ++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 870ca04e0888..4c3787699cdf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1609,6 +1609,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops {
 	(1 << (2 +(INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe))))
 #define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_OVERLAY(pipe) \
 	(1 << (3 +(INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe))))
+#define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe) \
+	(0xf << (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe)))
 
 struct drm_i915_gem_object {
 	struct drm_gem_object base;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 64145aeefe28..b8359f4a6dc4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ static const uint32_t intel_cursor_formats[] = {
 #define DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ll, d)	\
 ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)/2; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
 
-static void intel_increase_pllclock(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
+static void intel_increase_pllclock(struct drm_device *dev,
+				    enum pipe pipe);
 static void intel_crtc_update_cursor(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool on);
 
 static void i9xx_crtc_clock_get(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
@@ -2585,7 +2586,7 @@ intel_pipe_set_base_atomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
 
 	if (dev_priv->display.disable_fbc)
 		dev_priv->display.disable_fbc(dev);
-	intel_increase_pllclock(crtc);
+	intel_increase_pllclock(dev, to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe);
 
 	dev_priv->display.update_primary_plane(crtc, fb, x, y);
 
@@ -8723,12 +8724,10 @@ struct drm_display_mode *intel_crtc_mode_get(struct drm_device *dev,
 	return mode;
 }
 
-static void intel_increase_pllclock(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
+static void intel_increase_pllclock(struct drm_device *dev,
+				    enum pipe pipe)
 {
-	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
-	int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
 	int dpll_reg = DPLL(pipe);
 	int dpll;
 
@@ -8834,21 +8833,19 @@ void intel_mark_fb_busy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 			struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
 {
 	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
-	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+	enum pipe pipe;
 
 	intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
 
 	if (!i915.powersave)
 		return;
 
-	for_each_crtc(dev, crtc) {
-		if (!crtc->primary->fb)
-			continue;
-
-		if (to_intel_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb)->obj != obj)
+	for_each_pipe(pipe) {
+		if (!(obj->frontbuffer_bits &
+		      INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe)))
 			continue;
 
-		intel_increase_pllclock(crtc);
+		intel_increase_pllclock(dev, pipe);
 		if (ring && intel_fbc_enabled(dev))
 			ring->fbc_dirty = true;
 	}
@@ -12658,7 +12655,6 @@ void intel_connector_unregister(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
 void intel_modeset_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
 	struct drm_connector *connector;
 
 	/*
@@ -12678,14 +12674,6 @@ void intel_modeset_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	intel_unregister_dsm_handler();
 
-	for_each_crtc(dev, crtc) {
-		/* Skip inactive CRTCs */
-		if (!crtc->primary->fb)
-			continue;
-
-		intel_increase_pllclock(crtc);
-	}
-
 	intel_disable_fbc(dev);
 
 	intel_disable_gt_powersave(dev);
-- 
2.0.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-16 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16 17:51 [PATCH 00/15] Accurate frontbuffer tracking and psr conversion Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Add missing statics to recent psr functions Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 23:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  8:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Drop unecessary complexity from psr_inactivate Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 23:58   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Ditch intel_edp_psr_update Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:00   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Run psr_setup unconditionally Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:03   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  6:43     ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  8:26         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Drop schedule_back from psr_exit Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:06   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  7:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Add a FIXME about drrs/psr interactions Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Track the psr dp connector in dev_priv->psr.enabled Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  7:26     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Don't try to disable psr harder from the work item Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:20   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  7:29     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Lock down psr sw/hw state tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: More checks for psr.enabled Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Add locking to psr code Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Introduce accurate frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Track frontbuffer invalidation/flushing Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:41   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:32     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:36       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:01         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:46   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:33     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:49   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:36     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:50   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:40       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:42         ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  6:52   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:39     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:54   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:45     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:53       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:17         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:57   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:48     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:55       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:00   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:52     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  8:10       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:33         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  9:42           ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:54             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 10:00               ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Fix up PSR frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:02   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  8:06     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:07   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  8:08     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 19:37 ` [PATCH 00/15] Accurate frontbuffer tracking and psr conversion Chris Wilson
2014-06-16 20:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:09 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:30   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1402941095-27879-14-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.