All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Drop schedule_back from psr_exit
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:06:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABVU7+vxT+jd_=UWUpjFhO1nwxzmTf9RUU7QLqkjK4uHTC9S-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402941095-27879-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5424 bytes --]

There were more reasons for disabling it on Baytrail... but you are right..
disable sequence should be better for those cases.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
wrote:

> It doesn't make sense to never again schedule the work, since by the
> time we might want to re-enable psr the world might have changed and
> we can do it again.
>
> The only exception is when we shut down the pipe, but that's an
> entirely different thing and needs to be handled in psr_disable.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c      | 6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c      | 7 +++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  | 2 +-
>  5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 1794a041c13c..f22b4aabb945 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ i915_gem_set_domain_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> void *data,
>                 goto unlock;
>         }
>
> -       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev, true);
> +       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
>
>         /* Try to flush the object off the GPU without holding the lock.
>          * We will repeat the flush holding the lock in the normal manner
> @@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ i915_gem_sw_finish_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> void *data,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev, true);
> +       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
>
>         obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, args->handle));
>         if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> @@ -4240,7 +4240,7 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> *data,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev, true);
> +       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
>
>         obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, args->handle));
>         if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index c27dadebd0dc..6f2588c95248 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -8823,7 +8823,7 @@ void intel_mark_fb_busy(struct drm_i915_gem_object
> *obj,
>         struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
>         struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>
> -       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev, true);
> +       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
>
>         if (!i915.powersave)
>                 return;
> @@ -9292,7 +9292,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc
> *crtc,
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
>         /* Exit PSR early in page flip */
> -       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev, true);
> +       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
>
>         work->event = event;
>         work->crtc = crtc;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 4ab4757fb53d..c7d625040e3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_inactivate(struct
> drm_device *dev)
>                    & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
>  }
>
> -void intel_edp_psr_exit(struct drm_device *dev, bool schedule_back)
> +void intel_edp_psr_exit(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> @@ -1911,9 +1911,8 @@ void intel_edp_psr_exit(struct drm_device *dev, bool
> schedule_back)
>         if (dev_priv->psr.active)
>                 intel_edp_psr_inactivate(dev);
>
> -       if (schedule_back)
> -               schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
> -                                     msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> +       schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
> +                             msecs_to_jiffies(100));
>  }
>
>  void intel_edp_psr_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 87e83c315c4b..1d45629a6483 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_edp_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_dp_set_drrs_state(struct drm_device *dev, int refresh_rate);
> -void intel_edp_psr_exit(struct drm_device *dev, bool schedule_back);
> +void intel_edp_psr_exit(struct drm_device *dev);
>  void intel_edp_psr_init(struct drm_device *dev);
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index 2a211c64ec8d..9038e2ab73c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct
> drm_crtc *crtc,
>                 mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>         }
>
> -       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev, true);
> +       intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.0.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>



-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6926 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16 17:51 [PATCH 00/15] Accurate frontbuffer tracking and psr conversion Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Add missing statics to recent psr functions Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 23:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  8:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Drop unecessary complexity from psr_inactivate Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 23:58   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Ditch intel_edp_psr_update Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:00   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Run psr_setup unconditionally Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:03   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  6:43     ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  8:26         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Drop schedule_back from psr_exit Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:06   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2014-06-17  7:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Add a FIXME about drrs/psr interactions Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Track the psr dp connector in dev_priv->psr.enabled Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  7:26     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Don't try to disable psr harder from the work item Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  0:20   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-17  7:29     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Lock down psr sw/hw state tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: More checks for psr.enabled Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Add locking to psr code Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Introduce accurate frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Use new frontbuffer bits to increase pll clock Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Track frontbuffer invalidation/flushing Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:41   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:32     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:36       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:01         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:46   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:33     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:49   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:36     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:50   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:40       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:42         ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  6:52   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:39     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:54   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:45     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:53       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:17         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  6:57   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:48     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:55       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:00   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  7:52     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  8:10       ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:33         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  9:42           ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:54             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 10:00               ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Fix up PSR frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:02   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  8:06     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:07   ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  8:08     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-16 19:37 ` [PATCH 00/15] Accurate frontbuffer tracking and psr conversion Chris Wilson
2014-06-16 20:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:09 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-17  9:30   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABVU7+vxT+jd_=UWUpjFhO1nwxzmTf9RUU7QLqkjK4uHTC9S-g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.