All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
To: edubezval@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, heiko@sntech.de,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rocky.hao@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
	cf@rock-chips.com, smbarber@google.com, dianders@chromium.org,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rockchip: fixes the period time for tsadc
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:13:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466590437-15912-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466584925-4829-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com>

We should increase the period cycles to save power since the rk3399 has
the high frequency for tsadc clock.

Fixes commit b0d70338bca22cb14
("thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3399 SoCs in thermal driver")

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

---

Note:
- depend on the " [v6,5/5] thermal: rockchip: add the set_trips function"
  at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9192179/, otherwise will cause the merge
  conflict.

 drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index 8175cdb..2d5ba97 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -211,8 +211,11 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
 
 #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT	4
 #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT	4
-#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		250 /* msec */
-#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME		50  /* msec */
+#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		250 /* 250ms */
+#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME		50  /* 50ms */
+#define TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		187500 /* 250ms */
+#define TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME		37500  /* 50ms */
+
 #define TSADCV2_USER_INTER_PD_SOC		0x340 /* 13 clocks */
 
 #define GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT			0x0e644
@@ -547,6 +550,16 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
 		/* Set interleave value to workround ic time sync issue */
 		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_USER_INTER_PD_SOC, regs +
 			       TSADCV2_USER_CON);
+
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE);
+
 	} else {
 		regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L, GRF_TSADC_TSEN_PD_ON);
 		mdelay(10);
@@ -555,6 +568,15 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
 		regmap_write(grf, GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT, GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT_ON);
 		regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H_ON);
 		usleep_range(90, 200); /* The spec note says at least 90 us */
+
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE);
 	}
 
 	if (tshut_polarity == TSHUT_HIGH_ACTIVE)
@@ -563,14 +585,6 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
 	else
 		writel_relaxed(0U & ~TSADCV2_AUTO_TSHUT_POLARITY_HIGH,
 			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
-
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD);
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
-		       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE);
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME,
-		       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT);
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
-		       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE);
 }
 
 static void rk_tsadcv2_irq_ack(void __iomem *regs)
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Caesar Wang <wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
To: edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: huangtao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	smbarber-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	cf-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	rocky.hao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	Caesar Wang <wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rockchip: fixes the period time for tsadc
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:13:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466590437-15912-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466584925-4829-1-git-send-email-wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>

We should increase the period cycles to save power since the rk3399 has
the high frequency for tsadc clock.

Fixes commit b0d70338bca22cb14
("thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3399 SoCs in thermal driver")

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org

---

Note:
- depend on the " [v6,5/5] thermal: rockchip: add the set_trips function"
  at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9192179/, otherwise will cause the merge
  conflict.

 drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index 8175cdb..2d5ba97 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -211,8 +211,11 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
 
 #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT	4
 #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT	4
-#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		250 /* msec */
-#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME		50  /* msec */
+#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		250 /* 250ms */
+#define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME		50  /* 50ms */
+#define TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		187500 /* 250ms */
+#define TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME		37500  /* 50ms */
+
 #define TSADCV2_USER_INTER_PD_SOC		0x340 /* 13 clocks */
 
 #define GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT			0x0e644
@@ -547,6 +550,16 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
 		/* Set interleave value to workround ic time sync issue */
 		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_USER_INTER_PD_SOC, regs +
 			       TSADCV2_USER_CON);
+
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE);
+
 	} else {
 		regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L, GRF_TSADC_TSEN_PD_ON);
 		mdelay(10);
@@ -555,6 +568,15 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
 		regmap_write(grf, GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT, GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT_ON);
 		regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H_ON);
 		usleep_range(90, 200); /* The spec note says at least 90 us */
+
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV3_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT);
+		writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
+			       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE);
 	}
 
 	if (tshut_polarity == TSHUT_HIGH_ACTIVE)
@@ -563,14 +585,6 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
 	else
 		writel_relaxed(0U & ~TSADCV2_AUTO_TSHUT_POLARITY_HIGH,
 			       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
-
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD);
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
-		       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE);
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT_TIME,
-		       regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT);
-	writel_relaxed(TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT,
-		       regs + TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE);
 }
 
 static void rk_tsadcv2_irq_ack(void __iomem *regs)
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22  8:42 [PATCH v6 0/5] Thermal: Support for hardware-tracked trip points Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42 ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42 ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] thermal: Add support " Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42   ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] thermal: of: implement .set_trips for device tree thermal zones Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42   ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] thermal: streamline get_trend callbacks Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42   ` Caesar Wang
2016-07-02  2:41   ` Eduardo Valentin
2016-06-22  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower trip boundary Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42   ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] thermal: rockchip: add the set_trips function Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42   ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22  8:42   ` Caesar Wang
2016-06-22 10:13 ` Caesar Wang [this message]
2016-06-22 10:13   ` [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rockchip: fixes the period time for tsadc Caesar Wang
2016-06-22 10:13   ` [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rockchip: fixes the exception interrupts Caesar Wang
2016-06-22 10:13     ` Caesar Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466590437-15912-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com \
    --to=wxt@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=cf@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rocky.hao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=smbarber@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.