From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
mattst88@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, ralf@linux-mips.org,
paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
chenhc@lemote.com
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
len.brown@intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, cai@lca.pw,
luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 05:58:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting
of proximity domain is optional, as below:
This optional object is used to describe proximity domain
associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer
that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain
defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT).
This patch checks node id with the below case before returning
node_to_cpumask_map[node]:
1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask
2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask
3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so the
cpumask_clear should be called with node_to_cpumask_map[node]
instead of &node_to_cpumask_map[node]? And cpumask_of_node()
function need to be inlined when defined in a header file?
If the above are problems, maybe another patch to fix or clean
it up.
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
index 5a77a40..9e0b1cd1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
int cpu;
- if (node = NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return cpu_all_mask;
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids)
+ return cpu_none_mask;
+
+ if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node])
+ return cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
--
2.8.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <rth@twiddle.net>, <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
<mattst88@gmail.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
<paulus@samba.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
<heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
<dalias@libc.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
<paul.burton@mips.com>, <jhogan@kernel.org>,
<jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
<anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <cai@lca.pw>,
<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <len.brown@intel.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<dledford@redhat.com>, <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
<linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>, <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
<tbogendoerfer@suse.de>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting
of proximity domain is optional, as below:
This optional object is used to describe proximity domain
associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer
that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain
defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT).
This patch checks node id with the below case before returning
node_to_cpumask_map[node]:
1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask
2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask
3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so the
cpumask_clear should be called with node_to_cpumask_map[node]
instead of &node_to_cpumask_map[node]? And cpumask_of_node()
function need to be inlined when defined in a header file?
If the above are problems, maybe another patch to fix or clean
it up.
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
index 5a77a40..9e0b1cd1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
int cpu;
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return cpu_all_mask;
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids)
+ return cpu_none_mask;
+
+ if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node])
+ return cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
--
2.8.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
mattst88@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, ralf@linux-mips.org,
paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
chenhc@lemote.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, cai@lca.pw,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, len.brown@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting
of proximity domain is optional, as below:
This optional object is used to describe proximity domain
associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer
that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain
defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT).
This patch checks node id with the below case before returning
node_to_cpumask_map[node]:
1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask
2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask
3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so the
cpumask_clear should be called with node_to_cpumask_map[node]
instead of &node_to_cpumask_map[node]? And cpumask_of_node()
function need to be inlined when defined in a header file?
If the above are problems, maybe another patch to fix or clean
it up.
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
index 5a77a40..9e0b1cd1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
int cpu;
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return cpu_all_mask;
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids)
+ return cpu_none_mask;
+
+ if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node])
+ return cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
--
2.8.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <rth@twiddle.net>, <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
<mattst88@gmail.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
<paulus@samba.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
<heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
<dalias@libc.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
<paul.burton@mips.com>, <jhogan@kernel.org>,
<jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
len.brown@intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, cai@lca.pw,
luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting
of proximity domain is optional, as below:
This optional object is used to describe proximity domain
associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer
that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain
defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT).
This patch checks node id with the below case before returning
node_to_cpumask_map[node]:
1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask
2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask
3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so the
cpumask_clear should be called with node_to_cpumask_map[node]
instead of &node_to_cpumask_map[node]? And cpumask_of_node()
function need to be inlined when defined in a header file?
If the above are problems, maybe another patch to fix or clean
it up.
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
index 5a77a40..9e0b1cd1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
int cpu;
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return cpu_all_mask;
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids)
+ return cpu_none_mask;
+
+ if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node])
+ return cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
--
2.8.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <rth@twiddle.net>, <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
<mattst88@gmail.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
<paulus@samba.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
<heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
<dalias@libc.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
<paul.burton@mips.com>, <jhogan@kernel.org>,
<jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
len.brown@intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, cai@lca.pw,
luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting
of proximity domain is optional, as below:
This optional object is used to describe proximity domain
associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer
that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain
defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT).
This patch checks node id with the below case before returning
node_to_cpumask_map[node]:
1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask
2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask
3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so the
cpumask_clear should be called with node_to_cpumask_map[node]
instead of &node_to_cpumask_map[node]? And cpumask_of_node()
function need to be inlined when defined in a header file?
If the above are problems, maybe another patch to fix or clean
it up.
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
index 5a77a40..9e0b1cd1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
int cpu;
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return cpu_all_mask;
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids)
+ return cpu_none_mask;
+
+ if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node])
+ return cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
--
2.8.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
mattst88@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, ralf@linux-mips.org,
paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
chenhc@lemote.com
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
len.brown@intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, cai@lca.pw,
luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting
of proximity domain is optional, as below:
This optional object is used to describe proximity domain
associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer
that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain
defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT).
This patch checks node id with the below case before returning
node_to_cpumask_map[node]:
1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask
2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask
3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask
[1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so the
cpumask_clear should be called with node_to_cpumask_map[node]
instead of &node_to_cpumask_map[node]? And cpumask_of_node()
function need to be inlined when defined in a header file?
If the above are problems, maybe another patch to fix or clean
it up.
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
index 5a77a40..9e0b1cd1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
int cpu;
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- return cpu_all_mask;
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids)
+ return cpu_none_mask;
+
+ if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node])
+ return cpu_online_mask;
cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-31 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 164+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-31 5:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] check the node id consistently across different arches Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] arm64: numa: check the node id consistently for arm64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-01 4:45 ` Something about loongson_llsc_mb 陈华才
[not found] ` <2019090410032559707512@loongson.cn>
2019-09-04 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 12:57 ` Huang Pei
2019-09-02 5:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86 Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 12:15 ` Salil Mehta
2019-09-03 12:15 ` Salil Mehta
2019-09-03 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-03 7:53 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc: numa: check the node id consistently for powerpc Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] s390: numa: check the node id consistently for s390 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] sh: numa: check the node id consistently for sh Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for sparc64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips ip27 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 15:45 ` Paul Burton
2019-08-31 15:45 ` Paul Burton
2019-08-31 15:45 ` Paul Burton
2019-09-02 6:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips loongson64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1567231103-13237-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.