From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net,
axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:53:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903075352.GY2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".
Full patch below.
---
Subject: x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS we validate that the @node argument of
cpumask_of_node() is a valid node_id. It however forgets to check for
negative numbers. Fix this by explicitly casting to unsigned.
(unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids
verifies: 0 <= node < nr_node_ids
Also ammend the error message to match the condition.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index e6dad600614c..4123100e0eaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -861,9 +861,9 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
*/
const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
- if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
+ if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
- "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
+ "cpumask_of_node(%d): (unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
node, nr_node_ids);
dump_stack();
return cpu_none_mask;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net,
axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903075352.GY2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".
Full patch below.
---
Subject: x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS we validate that the @node argument of
cpumask_of_node() is a valid node_id. It however forgets to check for
negative numbers. Fix this by explicitly casting to unsigned.
(unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids
verifies: 0 <= node < nr_node_ids
Also ammend the error message to match the condition.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index e6dad600614c..4123100e0eaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -861,9 +861,9 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
*/
const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
- if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
+ if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
- "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
+ "cpumask_of_node(%d): (unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
node, nr_node_ids);
dump_stack();
return cpu_none_mask;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
x86@kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jhogan@kernel.org,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, cai@lca.pw,
luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net,
axboe@kernel.dk, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
tbogendoerfer@suse.de, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903075352.GY2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".
Full patch below.
---
Subject: x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS we validate that the @node argument of
cpumask_of_node() is a valid node_id. It however forgets to check for
negative numbers. Fix this by explicitly casting to unsigned.
(unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids
verifies: 0 <= node < nr_node_ids
Also ammend the error message to match the condition.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index e6dad600614c..4123100e0eaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -861,9 +861,9 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
*/
const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
- if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
+ if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
- "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
+ "cpumask_of_node(%d): (unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
node, nr_node_ids);
dump_stack();
return cpu_none_mask;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, n
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903075352.GY2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".
Full patch below.
---
Subject: x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition
When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS we validate that the @node argument of
cpumask_of_node() is a valid node_id. It however forgets to check for
negative numbers. Fix this by explicitly casting to unsigned.
(unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids
verifies: 0 <= node < nr_node_ids
Also ammend the error message to match the condition.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index e6dad600614c..4123100e0eaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -861,9 +861,9 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
*/
const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
{
- if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
+ if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
- "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
+ "cpumask_of_node(%d): (unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
node, nr_node_ids);
dump_stack();
return cpu_none_mask;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 164+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-31 5:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] check the node id consistently across different arches Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] arm64: numa: check the node id consistently for arm64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-01 4:45 ` Something about loongson_llsc_mb 陈华才
[not found] ` <2019090410032559707512@loongson.cn>
2019-09-04 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 12:57 ` Huang Pei
2019-09-02 5:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86 Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 5:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 6:19 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 8:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 12:15 ` Salil Mehta
2019-09-03 12:15 ` Salil Mehta
2019-09-03 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-03 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-09-03 7:53 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc: numa: check the node id consistently for powerpc Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] s390: numa: check the node id consistently for s390 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02 4:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] sh: numa: check the node id consistently for sh Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for sparc64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 6:53 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 8:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:08 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17 ` David Miller
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips ip27 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 15:45 ` Paul Burton
2019-08-31 15:45 ` Paul Burton
2019-08-31 15:45 ` Paul Burton
2019-09-02 6:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 6:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips loongson64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903075352.GY2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.