All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
	tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	hbabu@us.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, khalid@gonehiking.org,
	horms@verge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only reset e820 once, even with multiple memmap=exactmap params
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:21:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586060.uJlkOEQfVW@hammer82.arch.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQW=gT86Eo0gwPHi5iFi4sg=1SHkBohBAo2KXdoB_Ouqvw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:19:18 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
...
> 
> that exactmap logic still have problem:
> We need to check exactmap at first, aka need to scan the whole comand line
> to see if exactmap is there at first and reset e820 tables then handle
> other memmap opt.
> 
> Also please update your patch after
> 
> tip/x86/mm2
> 
> I have one patch that process memmap= with "," there.
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=9710f58
> 1bb4c35589ac046b0cfc0deb7f369fc85
> 
> We could put exactmap scanning in new parse_memmap_opt.

I still do not understand why:

Kexec (kexec/firmware_memmap.c) is setting up the e820 map from:
/sys/firmware/memmap/*
and pass it via bootloader structures.
And this e820 table gets immediately voided by memmap=exactmap
and a new one passed via boot parameters is set up.
If I read this correctly, this is what happens?

Can kexec simply pass the memory to use via memmap=X@Y
Then take the original e820 table, but not the usable entries (those
are coming from above memmap=X@Y).
That would mean that the kexec kernel takes all the
original ACPI, ACPI NVS, reserved, unusable (everthing but usable) entries
from the original e820 table and identifies the usable memory from
memmap boot param?

This would be much smarter than trying to pass the mmconf reserved
area and I could imagine other issues will show up if the reserved areas
do not match the original ones in the kexec kernel.

If this really can be done and memmap=exactmap was only used by kexec,
it's logic could be redefined from "drop all e820 entries" to
"drop all usable e820 entries" and no further adjustings in kexec/kernel are
needed to get mmconf working (and other issues may be avoided before
they happen). Beside that ACPI reserved aread is not needed anymore to get
passed via memmap=X#Y by kexec.

   Thomas

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: horms@verge.net.au, Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
	andi@firstfloor.org, ddutile@redhat.com,
	ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, khalid@gonehiking.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only reset e820 once, even with multiple memmap=exactmap params
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:21:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586060.uJlkOEQfVW@hammer82.arch.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQW=gT86Eo0gwPHi5iFi4sg=1SHkBohBAo2KXdoB_Ouqvw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:19:18 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
...
> 
> that exactmap logic still have problem:
> We need to check exactmap at first, aka need to scan the whole comand line
> to see if exactmap is there at first and reset e820 tables then handle
> other memmap opt.
> 
> Also please update your patch after
> 
> tip/x86/mm2
> 
> I have one patch that process memmap= with "," there.
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=9710f58
> 1bb4c35589ac046b0cfc0deb7f369fc85
> 
> We could put exactmap scanning in new parse_memmap_opt.

I still do not understand why:

Kexec (kexec/firmware_memmap.c) is setting up the e820 map from:
/sys/firmware/memmap/*
and pass it via bootloader structures.
And this e820 table gets immediately voided by memmap=exactmap
and a new one passed via boot parameters is set up.
If I read this correctly, this is what happens?

Can kexec simply pass the memory to use via memmap=X@Y
Then take the original e820 table, but not the usable entries (those
are coming from above memmap=X@Y).
That would mean that the kexec kernel takes all the
original ACPI, ACPI NVS, reserved, unusable (everthing but usable) entries
from the original e820 table and identifies the usable memory from
memmap boot param?

This would be much smarter than trying to pass the mmconf reserved
area and I could imagine other issues will show up if the reserved areas
do not match the original ones in the kexec kernel.

If this really can be done and memmap=exactmap was only used by kexec,
it's logic could be redefined from "drop all e820 entries" to
"drop all usable e820 entries" and no further adjustings in kexec/kernel are
needed to get mmconf working (and other issues may be avoided before
they happen). Beside that ACPI reserved aread is not needed anymore to get
passed via memmap=X#Y by kexec.

   Thomas

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-10  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27  0:42 [PATCH v7 0/5] Reset PCIe devices to address DMA problem on kdump with iommu Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42 ` Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] x86, pci: add dummy pci device for early stage Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42   ` Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI: Define the maximum number of PCI function Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42   ` Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] Make reset_devices available at early stage Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:42   ` Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:43 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] x86, pci: Reset PCIe devices at boot time Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:43   ` Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:43 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] x86, pci: Enable PCI INTx when MSI is disabled Takao Indoh
2012-11-27  0:43   ` Takao Indoh
2012-11-30 15:49 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Reset PCIe devices to address DMA problem on kdump with iommu MUNEDA Takahiro
2012-11-30 15:49   ` MUNEDA Takahiro
2012-12-21 16:19   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-12-21 16:19     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-07 19:09     ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-07 19:09       ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-07 20:16       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-07 20:16         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-08  0:42         ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08  0:42           ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08  3:04           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-08  3:04             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-08 16:47             ` [PATCH] Only reset e820 once, even with multiple memmap=exactmap params Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08 16:47               ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08 17:19               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-08 17:19                 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10  3:21                 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2013-01-10  3:21                   ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-10 14:26                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-10 14:26                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-10 16:53                     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 16:53                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 17:01                       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-10 17:01                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-10 17:11                         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 17:11                           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-10 23:34                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 12:33                     ` [PATCH] x86 e820: only void usable memory areas in memmap=exactmap case Thomas Renninger
2013-01-11 12:33                       ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-11 16:16                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 16:16                         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 18:24                         ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-11 18:24                           ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-11 19:59                           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 19:59                             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 20:06                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-11 20:06                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-11 21:09                               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 21:09                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-11 22:16                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-11 22:16                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-12 11:31                                   ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-12 11:31                                     ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-12 17:07                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-12 17:07                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-14  2:08                                       ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-14  2:08                                         ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-14  2:43                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-14  2:43                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-14 15:05                                           ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-14 15:05                                             ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-14 19:04                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-14 19:04                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-15  0:54                                               ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-15  0:54                                                 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-15  4:45                                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-15  4:45                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-22 15:21                                                   ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:21                                                     ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08 16:50         ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Reset PCIe devices to address DMA problem on kdump with iommu Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08 16:50           ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-08 17:27           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-08 17:27             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-09  2:32             ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-09  2:32               ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-09  4:39               ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-09  4:39                 ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-21  1:11       ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-21  1:11         ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-23  0:47         ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-23  0:47           ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-24  0:23           ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-24  0:23             ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-29  1:14             ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-29  1:14               ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-30  5:01               ` Takao Indoh
2013-01-30  5:01                 ` Takao Indoh
2013-03-04  0:56           ` Takao Indoh
2013-03-04  0:56             ` Takao Indoh
2013-03-04 22:00             ` Don Dutile
2013-03-04 22:00               ` Don Dutile
2013-03-05  0:56               ` Takao Indoh
2013-03-05  0:56                 ` Takao Indoh
2012-12-21  9:59 ` oliver yang
2012-12-21 10:37   ` Takao Indoh
2012-12-21 10:37     ` Takao Indoh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1586060.uJlkOEQfVW@hammer82.arch.suse.de \
    --to=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=khalid@gonehiking.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.