All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: review protocol registration interface
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:03:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b461304-2c25-3206-5799-b561ac6e0bd2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014150545.44807-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

On 10/14/20 8:05 AM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic
> protocols' init/deinit helpers that tracks protocols' users and automatically
> perform the proper initialization/de-initialization on demand.
> 
> Convert all protocols to use new registration schema while modifying only Base
> protocol to use also the new initialization helpers.
> 
> All other standard protocols' initialization is still umodified and bound to
> SCMI devices probing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---

[snip]

> +static struct scmi_protocol scmi_base = {
> +	.id = SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE,
> +	.init = &scmi_base_protocol_init,
> +	.ops = NULL,
> +};

This could be const I believe.

> +
> +DEFINE_SCMI_PROTOCOL_REGISTER_UNREGISTER(base, scmi_base)
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> index 1377ec76a45d..afa2e4818a2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>  #include "common.h"
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDA(scmi_bus_id);
> -static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_protocols);
> +static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_available_protocols);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(protocol_lock);
>  
>  static const struct scmi_device_id *
> @@ -51,13 +51,29 @@ static int scmi_dev_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +const struct scmi_protocol *scmi_get_protocol(int protocol_id)
> +{
> +	const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> +
> +	proto = idr_find(&scmi_available_protocols, protocol_id);
> +	if (!proto) {
> +		pr_warn("SCMI Protocol 0x%x not found!\n", protocol_id);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_debug("GOT SCMI Protocol 0x%x\n", protocol_id);
> +
> +	return proto;
> +}
> +
>  static int scmi_protocol_init(int protocol_id, struct scmi_handle *handle)
>  {
> -	scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn = idr_find(&scmi_protocols, protocol_id);
> +	const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!fn))
> +	proto = idr_find(&scmi_available_protocols, protocol_id);
> +	if (!proto)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	return fn(handle);
> +	return proto->init(handle);
>  }
>  
>  static int scmi_protocol_dummy_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
> @@ -84,7 +100,7 @@ static int scmi_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Skip protocol initialisation for additional devices */
> -	idr_replace(&scmi_protocols, &scmi_protocol_dummy_init,
> +	idr_replace(&scmi_available_protocols, &scmi_protocol_dummy_init,
>  		    scmi_dev->protocol_id);
>  
>  	return scmi_drv->probe(scmi_dev);
> @@ -194,26 +210,45 @@ void scmi_set_handle(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev)
>  	scmi_dev->handle = scmi_handle_get(&scmi_dev->dev);
>  }
>  
> -int scmi_protocol_register(int protocol_id, scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn)
> +int scmi_protocol_register(struct scmi_protocol *proto)

And this could probably take a const struct scmi_protocol here too as
you do not appear to be modifying proto, idr_alloc() may complain.

[snip]

>  
> -DEFINE_SCMI_PROTOCOL_REGISTER_UNREGISTER(SCMI_PROTOCOL_CLOCK, clock)
> +static struct scmi_protocol scmi_clock = {

static const here too and throughout your submission.

[snip]

> +	struct scmi_protocol_instance *protocols[SCMI_MAX_PROTO];

Humm that would be 2048 bytes on a 64-bit platform and 1024 bytes on a
32-bit platform, this is not so bad, but it is a bit wasteful given that
6-7 standard protocols are typically found, and most often no
proprietary protocols are registered. Not necessarily to be addressed
right now.

> +	/* Ensure mutual exclusive access to protocols instance array */
> +	struct mutex protocols_mtx;
>  	u8 *protocols_imp;
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	int users;
> @@ -519,6 +542,132 @@ int scmi_version_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * scmi_get_protocol_instance  - Protocol initialization helper.
> + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> + *
> + * In case the required protocol has never been requested before for this
> + * instance, allocate and initialize all the needed structures while handling
> + * resource allocation with a dedicated per-protocol devres subgroup.
> + *
> + * Return: A reference to an initialized protocol instance or error on failure.
> + */
> +static struct scmi_protocol_instance * __must_check
> +scmi_get_protocol_instance(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> +{
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +	void *gid;
> +	struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi;
> +	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +	/* Ensure protocols has been updated */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	pi = info->protocols[protocol_id];
> +
> +	if (!pi) {
> +		const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> +
> +		/* Fail if protocol not registered on bus */
> +		proto = scmi_get_protocol(protocol_id);
> +		if (!proto) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;

You could return -ENODEV here and propagate that error code for
scmi_probe() to use as -is.

> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Protocol specific devres group */
> +		gid = devres_open_group(handle->dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!gid)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		pi = devm_kzalloc(handle->dev, sizeof(*pi), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!pi)
> +			goto clean;
> +
> +		pi->gid = gid;
> +		pi->proto = proto;
> +		refcount_set(&pi->users, 1);
> +		/* proto->init is assured NON NULL by scmi_protocol_register */
> +		ret = pi->proto->init(handle);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto clean;
> +
> +		info->protocols[protocol_id] = pi;
> +		/* Ensure initialized protocol is visible */
> +		smp_wmb();
> +
> +		devres_close_group(handle->dev, pi->gid);
> +		dev_dbg(handle->dev, "Initialized protocol: 0x%X\n",
> +			protocol_id);
> +	} else {
> +		refcount_inc(&pi->users);
> +	}

You may be able to re-arrange the indentation and do:

	if (pi) {
		refcount_inc(&pi->users);
		mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
		return pi;
	}

to reduce the indentation level, and this would also have the fast path
tested first.

> +	mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +
> +	return pi;
> +
> +clean:
> +	devres_release_group(handle->dev, gid);
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_acquire_protocol  - Protocol acquire
> + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> + *
> + * Register a new user for the requested protocol on the specified SCMI
> + * platform instance, possibly triggering its initialization on first user.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if protocol was acquired successfully.
> + */
> +int scmi_acquire_protocol(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> +{
> +	return IS_ERR(scmi_get_protocol_instance(handle, protocol_id));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_release_protocol  - Protocol de-initialization helper.
> + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> + *
> + * Remove one user for the specified protocol and triggers de-initialization
> + * and resources de-allocation once the last user has gone.
> + */
> +void scmi_release_protocol(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> +{
> +	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
> +	struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +	/* Ensure protocols has been updated */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	pi = info->protocols[protocol_id];
> +	if (WARN_ON(!pi)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +		return;

Maybe define an "out" label just to avoid the repetition?

> +	}
> +
> +	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pi->users)) {
> +		void *gid = pi->gid;
> +
> +		if (pi->proto->deinit)
> +			pi->proto->deinit(handle);
> +
> +		info->protocols[protocol_id] = NULL;
> +		/* Ensure deinitialized protocol is visible */
> +		smp_wmb();
> +
> +		devres_release_group(handle->dev, gid);
> +		dev_dbg(handle->dev, "De-Initialized protocol: 0x%X\n",
> +			protocol_id);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +}
> +
>  void scmi_setup_protocol_implemented(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
>  				     u8 *prot_imp)
>  {
> @@ -785,6 +934,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	info->dev = dev;
>  	info->desc = desc;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->node);
> +	mutex_init(&info->protocols_mtx);
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
>  	idr_init(&info->tx_idr);
> @@ -805,10 +955,14 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (scmi_notification_init(handle))
>  		dev_err(dev, "SCMI Notifications NOT available.\n");
>  
> -	ret = scmi_base_protocol_init(handle);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI(%d)\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +	/*
> +	 * Trigger SCMI Base protocol initialization.
> +	 * It's mandatory and won't be ever released/deinit until the
> +	 * SCMI stack is shutdown/unloaded as a whole.
> +	 */
> +	if (scmi_acquire_protocol(handle, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;

and you could do:

ret = scmi_acquire_protocol(.., ...);
if (ret) {
	dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n");
	return ret;
}

Everything else looked good to me, thanks!
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	thara.gopinath@linaro.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: review protocol registration interface
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:03:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b461304-2c25-3206-5799-b561ac6e0bd2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014150545.44807-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

On 10/14/20 8:05 AM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic
> protocols' init/deinit helpers that tracks protocols' users and automatically
> perform the proper initialization/de-initialization on demand.
> 
> Convert all protocols to use new registration schema while modifying only Base
> protocol to use also the new initialization helpers.
> 
> All other standard protocols' initialization is still umodified and bound to
> SCMI devices probing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---

[snip]

> +static struct scmi_protocol scmi_base = {
> +	.id = SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE,
> +	.init = &scmi_base_protocol_init,
> +	.ops = NULL,
> +};

This could be const I believe.

> +
> +DEFINE_SCMI_PROTOCOL_REGISTER_UNREGISTER(base, scmi_base)
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> index 1377ec76a45d..afa2e4818a2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>  #include "common.h"
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDA(scmi_bus_id);
> -static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_protocols);
> +static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_available_protocols);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(protocol_lock);
>  
>  static const struct scmi_device_id *
> @@ -51,13 +51,29 @@ static int scmi_dev_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +const struct scmi_protocol *scmi_get_protocol(int protocol_id)
> +{
> +	const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> +
> +	proto = idr_find(&scmi_available_protocols, protocol_id);
> +	if (!proto) {
> +		pr_warn("SCMI Protocol 0x%x not found!\n", protocol_id);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_debug("GOT SCMI Protocol 0x%x\n", protocol_id);
> +
> +	return proto;
> +}
> +
>  static int scmi_protocol_init(int protocol_id, struct scmi_handle *handle)
>  {
> -	scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn = idr_find(&scmi_protocols, protocol_id);
> +	const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!fn))
> +	proto = idr_find(&scmi_available_protocols, protocol_id);
> +	if (!proto)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	return fn(handle);
> +	return proto->init(handle);
>  }
>  
>  static int scmi_protocol_dummy_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
> @@ -84,7 +100,7 @@ static int scmi_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Skip protocol initialisation for additional devices */
> -	idr_replace(&scmi_protocols, &scmi_protocol_dummy_init,
> +	idr_replace(&scmi_available_protocols, &scmi_protocol_dummy_init,
>  		    scmi_dev->protocol_id);
>  
>  	return scmi_drv->probe(scmi_dev);
> @@ -194,26 +210,45 @@ void scmi_set_handle(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev)
>  	scmi_dev->handle = scmi_handle_get(&scmi_dev->dev);
>  }
>  
> -int scmi_protocol_register(int protocol_id, scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn)
> +int scmi_protocol_register(struct scmi_protocol *proto)

And this could probably take a const struct scmi_protocol here too as
you do not appear to be modifying proto, idr_alloc() may complain.

[snip]

>  
> -DEFINE_SCMI_PROTOCOL_REGISTER_UNREGISTER(SCMI_PROTOCOL_CLOCK, clock)
> +static struct scmi_protocol scmi_clock = {

static const here too and throughout your submission.

[snip]

> +	struct scmi_protocol_instance *protocols[SCMI_MAX_PROTO];

Humm that would be 2048 bytes on a 64-bit platform and 1024 bytes on a
32-bit platform, this is not so bad, but it is a bit wasteful given that
6-7 standard protocols are typically found, and most often no
proprietary protocols are registered. Not necessarily to be addressed
right now.

> +	/* Ensure mutual exclusive access to protocols instance array */
> +	struct mutex protocols_mtx;
>  	u8 *protocols_imp;
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	int users;
> @@ -519,6 +542,132 @@ int scmi_version_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * scmi_get_protocol_instance  - Protocol initialization helper.
> + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> + *
> + * In case the required protocol has never been requested before for this
> + * instance, allocate and initialize all the needed structures while handling
> + * resource allocation with a dedicated per-protocol devres subgroup.
> + *
> + * Return: A reference to an initialized protocol instance or error on failure.
> + */
> +static struct scmi_protocol_instance * __must_check
> +scmi_get_protocol_instance(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> +{
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +	void *gid;
> +	struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi;
> +	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +	/* Ensure protocols has been updated */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	pi = info->protocols[protocol_id];
> +
> +	if (!pi) {
> +		const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> +
> +		/* Fail if protocol not registered on bus */
> +		proto = scmi_get_protocol(protocol_id);
> +		if (!proto) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;

You could return -ENODEV here and propagate that error code for
scmi_probe() to use as -is.

> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Protocol specific devres group */
> +		gid = devres_open_group(handle->dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!gid)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		pi = devm_kzalloc(handle->dev, sizeof(*pi), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!pi)
> +			goto clean;
> +
> +		pi->gid = gid;
> +		pi->proto = proto;
> +		refcount_set(&pi->users, 1);
> +		/* proto->init is assured NON NULL by scmi_protocol_register */
> +		ret = pi->proto->init(handle);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto clean;
> +
> +		info->protocols[protocol_id] = pi;
> +		/* Ensure initialized protocol is visible */
> +		smp_wmb();
> +
> +		devres_close_group(handle->dev, pi->gid);
> +		dev_dbg(handle->dev, "Initialized protocol: 0x%X\n",
> +			protocol_id);
> +	} else {
> +		refcount_inc(&pi->users);
> +	}

You may be able to re-arrange the indentation and do:

	if (pi) {
		refcount_inc(&pi->users);
		mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
		return pi;
	}

to reduce the indentation level, and this would also have the fast path
tested first.

> +	mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +
> +	return pi;
> +
> +clean:
> +	devres_release_group(handle->dev, gid);
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_acquire_protocol  - Protocol acquire
> + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> + *
> + * Register a new user for the requested protocol on the specified SCMI
> + * platform instance, possibly triggering its initialization on first user.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if protocol was acquired successfully.
> + */
> +int scmi_acquire_protocol(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> +{
> +	return IS_ERR(scmi_get_protocol_instance(handle, protocol_id));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_release_protocol  - Protocol de-initialization helper.
> + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> + *
> + * Remove one user for the specified protocol and triggers de-initialization
> + * and resources de-allocation once the last user has gone.
> + */
> +void scmi_release_protocol(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> +{
> +	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
> +	struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +	/* Ensure protocols has been updated */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	pi = info->protocols[protocol_id];
> +	if (WARN_ON(!pi)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +		return;

Maybe define an "out" label just to avoid the repetition?

> +	}
> +
> +	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pi->users)) {
> +		void *gid = pi->gid;
> +
> +		if (pi->proto->deinit)
> +			pi->proto->deinit(handle);
> +
> +		info->protocols[protocol_id] = NULL;
> +		/* Ensure deinitialized protocol is visible */
> +		smp_wmb();
> +
> +		devres_release_group(handle->dev, gid);
> +		dev_dbg(handle->dev, "De-Initialized protocol: 0x%X\n",
> +			protocol_id);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> +}
> +
>  void scmi_setup_protocol_implemented(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
>  				     u8 *prot_imp)
>  {
> @@ -785,6 +934,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	info->dev = dev;
>  	info->desc = desc;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->node);
> +	mutex_init(&info->protocols_mtx);
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
>  	idr_init(&info->tx_idr);
> @@ -805,10 +955,14 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (scmi_notification_init(handle))
>  		dev_err(dev, "SCMI Notifications NOT available.\n");
>  
> -	ret = scmi_base_protocol_init(handle);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI(%d)\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +	/*
> +	 * Trigger SCMI Base protocol initialization.
> +	 * It's mandatory and won't be ever released/deinit until the
> +	 * SCMI stack is shutdown/unloaded as a whole.
> +	 */
> +	if (scmi_acquire_protocol(handle, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;

and you could do:

ret = scmi_acquire_protocol(.., ...);
if (ret) {
	dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n");
	return ret;
}

Everything else looked good to me, thanks!
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-14 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-14 15:05 [PATCH 00/11] SCMI vendor protocols and modularization Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: review protocol registration interface Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 19:03   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2020-10-14 19:03     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-14 20:20     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-14 20:20       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-15  8:42     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-15  8:42       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-15  9:41   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-10-15  9:41     ` Vincent Guittot
2020-10-15  9:58     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-15  9:58       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21  2:46   ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21  2:46     ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21 10:08     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21 10:08       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: hide protocols' private data Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 19:19   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-14 19:19     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-15  8:52     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-15  8:52       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: introduce common protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21  2:47   ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21  2:47     ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21 10:27     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21 10:27       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-26 13:07       ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-26 13:07         ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-28 21:04         ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-28 21:04           ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: refactor events registration Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: make notify_priv really private Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: add support for protocol modularization Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21  2:47   ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21  2:47     ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21 10:30     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21 10:30       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] [DEBUG] firmware: arm_scmi: add example custom protocol Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] [DEBUG] arm64: dts: juno: add example custom protocol support Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] [DEBUG] firmware: arm_scmi: add example SCMI driver for custom protocol Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:55   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-14 15:55     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-14 16:44     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 16:44       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 10/11] [DEBUG] firmware: arm_scmi: add custom_dummy SCMI devname Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21  2:49   ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21  2:49     ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-21 11:35     ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-21 11:35       ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-26 12:37       ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-26 12:37         ` Thara Gopinath
2020-10-28 21:28         ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-28 21:28           ` Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] [DEBUG][HACK] firmware: arm_scmi: force implemented protocol 0x99 Cristian Marussi
2020-10-14 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b461304-2c25-3206-5799-b561ac6e0bd2@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.