All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kernel@collabora.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:59:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ce233a2-36c9-3698-59f0-c4ff902bec60@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ec9313e-8498-2838-0320-331c347ce905@amd.com>

On 7/15/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.07.22 um 02:52 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Intel i915 GPU driver uses wait-wound mutex to lock multiple GEMs on the
>> attachment to the i915 dma-buf. In order to let all drivers utilize
>> shared
>> wait-wound context during attachment in a general way, make dma-buf
>> core to
>> acquire the ww context internally for the attachment operation and update
>> i915 driver to use the importer's ww context instead of the internal one.
>>
>>  From now on all dma-buf exporters shall use the importer's ww context
>> for
>> the attachment operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     |  8 +++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  2 +-
>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  6 ++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            | 26 +++++++++++++++----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            | 15 +++++++++--
>>   7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> index 0ee588276534..37545ecb845a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static struct sg_table * __map_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>    * Optionally this calls &dma_buf_ops.attach to allow
>> device-specific attach
>>    * functionality.
>>    *
>> + * Exporters shall use ww_ctx acquired by this function.
>> + *
>>    * Returns:
>>    *
>>    * A pointer to newly created &dma_buf_attachment on success, or a
>> negative
>> @@ -822,6 +824,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>                   void *importer_priv)
>>   {
>>       struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> +    struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
>>       int ret;
>>         if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
>> @@ -841,7 +844,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>       attach->importer_ops = importer_ops;
>>       attach->importer_priv = importer_priv;
>>   -    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>> +    ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &reservation_ww_class);
>> +    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, &ww_ctx);
> 
> That won't work like this. The core property of a WW context is that you
> need to unwind all the locks and re-quire them with the contended one
> first.
> 
> When you statically lock the imported one here you can't do that any more.

You're right. I felt that something is missing here, but couldn't
notice. I'll think more about this and enable
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH. Thank you!

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:59:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ce233a2-36c9-3698-59f0-c4ff902bec60@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ec9313e-8498-2838-0320-331c347ce905@amd.com>

On 7/15/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.07.22 um 02:52 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Intel i915 GPU driver uses wait-wound mutex to lock multiple GEMs on the
>> attachment to the i915 dma-buf. In order to let all drivers utilize
>> shared
>> wait-wound context during attachment in a general way, make dma-buf
>> core to
>> acquire the ww context internally for the attachment operation and update
>> i915 driver to use the importer's ww context instead of the internal one.
>>
>>  From now on all dma-buf exporters shall use the importer's ww context
>> for
>> the attachment operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     |  8 +++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  2 +-
>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  6 ++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            | 26 +++++++++++++++----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            | 15 +++++++++--
>>   7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> index 0ee588276534..37545ecb845a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static struct sg_table * __map_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>    * Optionally this calls &dma_buf_ops.attach to allow
>> device-specific attach
>>    * functionality.
>>    *
>> + * Exporters shall use ww_ctx acquired by this function.
>> + *
>>    * Returns:
>>    *
>>    * A pointer to newly created &dma_buf_attachment on success, or a
>> negative
>> @@ -822,6 +824,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>                   void *importer_priv)
>>   {
>>       struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> +    struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
>>       int ret;
>>         if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
>> @@ -841,7 +844,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>       attach->importer_ops = importer_ops;
>>       attach->importer_priv = importer_priv;
>>   -    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>> +    ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &reservation_ww_class);
>> +    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, &ww_ctx);
> 
> That won't work like this. The core property of a WW context is that you
> need to unwind all the locks and re-quire them with the contended one
> first.
> 
> When you statically lock the imported one here you can't do that any more.

You're right. I felt that something is missing here, but couldn't
notice. I'll think more about this and enable
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH. Thank you!

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:59:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ce233a2-36c9-3698-59f0-c4ff902bec60@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ec9313e-8498-2838-0320-331c347ce905@amd.com>

On 7/15/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.07.22 um 02:52 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Intel i915 GPU driver uses wait-wound mutex to lock multiple GEMs on the
>> attachment to the i915 dma-buf. In order to let all drivers utilize
>> shared
>> wait-wound context during attachment in a general way, make dma-buf
>> core to
>> acquire the ww context internally for the attachment operation and update
>> i915 driver to use the importer's ww context instead of the internal one.
>>
>>  From now on all dma-buf exporters shall use the importer's ww context
>> for
>> the attachment operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     |  8 +++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  2 +-
>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  6 ++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            | 26 +++++++++++++++----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            | 15 +++++++++--
>>   7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> index 0ee588276534..37545ecb845a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static struct sg_table * __map_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>    * Optionally this calls &dma_buf_ops.attach to allow
>> device-specific attach
>>    * functionality.
>>    *
>> + * Exporters shall use ww_ctx acquired by this function.
>> + *
>>    * Returns:
>>    *
>>    * A pointer to newly created &dma_buf_attachment on success, or a
>> negative
>> @@ -822,6 +824,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>                   void *importer_priv)
>>   {
>>       struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
>> +    struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
>>       int ret;
>>         if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
>> @@ -841,7 +844,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>       attach->importer_ops = importer_ops;
>>       attach->importer_priv = importer_priv;
>>   -    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>> +    ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &reservation_ww_class);
>> +    dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, &ww_ctx);
> 
> That won't work like this. The core property of a WW context is that you
> need to unwind all the locks and re-quire them with the contended one
> first.
> 
> When you statically lock the imported one here you can't do that any more.

You're right. I felt that something is missing here, but couldn't
notice. I'll think more about this and enable
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH. Thank you!

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-15  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-15  0:52 [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  7:19   ` Christian König
2022-07-15  7:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15  7:19     ` Christian König
2022-07-15  7:19     ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  9:31     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  9:31       ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  9:31       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 11:04       ` Christian König
2022-07-15 11:04         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15 11:04         ` Christian König
2022-07-15 11:04         ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  7:31   ` Christian König
2022-07-15  7:31     ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  7:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15  7:31     ` Christian König
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  3:38   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-15  3:38     ` kernel test robot
2022-07-15  6:50   ` Christian König
2022-07-15  6:50     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15  6:50     ` Christian König
2022-07-15  6:50     ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  6:59     ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2022-07-15  6:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  6:59       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 20:05       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 20:05         ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 20:05         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20  8:29         ` Christian König
2022-07-20  8:29           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-20  8:29           ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-20  8:29           ` Christian König
2022-07-20 12:18           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20 12:18             ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20 12:18             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] dma-buf: Remove internal lock Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19  9:13 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention Tomasz Figa
2022-07-19  9:13   ` Tomasz Figa
2022-07-19  9:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tomasz Figa
2022-07-19  9:13   ` Tomasz Figa
2022-07-20 15:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ce233a2-36c9-3698-59f0-c4ff902bec60@collabora.com \
    --to=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gert.wollny@collabora.com \
    --cc=gurchetansingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.