All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Dmitry Osipenko" <digetx@gmail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kernel@collabora.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:13:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5C0dx5X=VEqXDyj22fbxs1jhOQLLid3vSNfAc9vataPhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715005244.42198-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This series moves all drivers to a dynamic dma-buf locking specification.
> From now on all dma-buf importers are made responsible for holding
> dma-buf's reservation lock around all operations performed over dma-bufs.
> This common locking convention allows us to utilize reservation lock more
> broadly around kernel without fearing of potential dead locks.
>
> This patchset passes all i915 selftests. It was also tested using VirtIO,
> Panfrost, Lima and Tegra drivers. I tested cases of display+GPU,
> display+V4L and GPU+V4L dma-buf sharing, which covers majority of kernel
> drivers since rest of the drivers share same or similar code paths.
>
> This is a continuation of [1] where Christian König asked to factor out
> the dma-buf locking changes into separate series.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220526235040.678984-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com/
>
> Dmitry Osipenko (6):
>   dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names
>   drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations
>   dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification
>   dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
>   media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock
>   dma-buf: Remove internal lock
>
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     | 198 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c   |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c       |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c           |  14 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c                  |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c                     |  28 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.c  |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c        |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c                   |  12 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_prime.c   |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c       |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  20 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |   6 +-
>  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |  20 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            |  26 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            |  15 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c     |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c              |  17 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_prime.c               |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c                   |  27 +--
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c         |  11 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c   |  26 +--
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c |  23 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c      |  17 +-

For the videobuf2 changes:

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Dmitry Osipenko" <digetx@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:13:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5C0dx5X=VEqXDyj22fbxs1jhOQLLid3vSNfAc9vataPhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715005244.42198-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This series moves all drivers to a dynamic dma-buf locking specification.
> From now on all dma-buf importers are made responsible for holding
> dma-buf's reservation lock around all operations performed over dma-bufs.
> This common locking convention allows us to utilize reservation lock more
> broadly around kernel without fearing of potential dead locks.
>
> This patchset passes all i915 selftests. It was also tested using VirtIO,
> Panfrost, Lima and Tegra drivers. I tested cases of display+GPU,
> display+V4L and GPU+V4L dma-buf sharing, which covers majority of kernel
> drivers since rest of the drivers share same or similar code paths.
>
> This is a continuation of [1] where Christian König asked to factor out
> the dma-buf locking changes into separate series.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220526235040.678984-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com/
>
> Dmitry Osipenko (6):
>   dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names
>   drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations
>   dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification
>   dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
>   media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock
>   dma-buf: Remove internal lock
>
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     | 198 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c   |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c       |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c           |  14 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c                  |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c                     |  28 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.c  |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c        |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c                   |  12 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_prime.c   |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c       |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  20 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |   6 +-
>  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |  20 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            |  26 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            |  15 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c     |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c              |  17 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_prime.c               |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c                   |  27 +--
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c         |  11 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c   |  26 +--
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c |  23 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c      |  17 +-

For the videobuf2 changes:

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Dmitry Osipenko" <digetx@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:13:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5C0dx5X=VEqXDyj22fbxs1jhOQLLid3vSNfAc9vataPhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715005244.42198-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This series moves all drivers to a dynamic dma-buf locking specification.
> From now on all dma-buf importers are made responsible for holding
> dma-buf's reservation lock around all operations performed over dma-bufs.
> This common locking convention allows us to utilize reservation lock more
> broadly around kernel without fearing of potential dead locks.
>
> This patchset passes all i915 selftests. It was also tested using VirtIO,
> Panfrost, Lima and Tegra drivers. I tested cases of display+GPU,
> display+V4L and GPU+V4L dma-buf sharing, which covers majority of kernel
> drivers since rest of the drivers share same or similar code paths.
>
> This is a continuation of [1] where Christian König asked to factor out
> the dma-buf locking changes into separate series.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220526235040.678984-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com/
>
> Dmitry Osipenko (6):
>   dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names
>   drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations
>   dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification
>   dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
>   media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock
>   dma-buf: Remove internal lock
>
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     | 198 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c   |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c       |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c           |  14 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c                  |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c                     |  28 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.c  |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c        |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c                   |  12 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_prime.c   |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c       |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  20 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |   6 +-
>  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |  20 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            |  26 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            |  15 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c     |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c              |  17 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_prime.c               |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c                   |  27 +--
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c         |  11 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c   |  26 +--
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c |  23 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c      |  17 +-

For the videobuf2 changes:

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Gurchetan Singh" <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Dmitry Osipenko" <digetx@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
	spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Chia-I Wu" <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"Gert Wollny" <gert.wollny@collabora.com>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:13:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5C0dx5X=VEqXDyj22fbxs1jhOQLLid3vSNfAc9vataPhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715005244.42198-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This series moves all drivers to a dynamic dma-buf locking specification.
> From now on all dma-buf importers are made responsible for holding
> dma-buf's reservation lock around all operations performed over dma-bufs.
> This common locking convention allows us to utilize reservation lock more
> broadly around kernel without fearing of potential dead locks.
>
> This patchset passes all i915 selftests. It was also tested using VirtIO,
> Panfrost, Lima and Tegra drivers. I tested cases of display+GPU,
> display+V4L and GPU+V4L dma-buf sharing, which covers majority of kernel
> drivers since rest of the drivers share same or similar code paths.
>
> This is a continuation of [1] where Christian König asked to factor out
> the dma-buf locking changes into separate series.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220526235040.678984-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com/
>
> Dmitry Osipenko (6):
>   dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names
>   drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations
>   dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification
>   dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment
>   media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock
>   dma-buf: Remove internal lock
>
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     | 198 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c   |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c       |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c           |  14 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c                  |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c                     |  28 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.c  |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c        |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c                   |  12 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_prime.c   |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c       |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  20 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |   6 +-
>  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |  20 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c            |  26 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h            |  15 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c     |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c              |  17 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_prime.c               |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c                   |  27 +--
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c         |  11 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c   |  26 +--
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c |  23 +-
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c      |  17 +-

For the videobuf2 changes:

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>

Best regards,
Tomasz

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-15  0:52 [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  7:19   ` Christian König
2022-07-15  7:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15  7:19     ` Christian König
2022-07-15  7:19     ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  9:31     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  9:31       ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  9:31       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15 11:04       ` Christian König
2022-07-15 11:04         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15 11:04         ` Christian König
2022-07-15 11:04         ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  7:31   ` Christian König
2022-07-15  7:31     ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  7:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15  7:31     ` Christian König
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  3:38   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-15  3:38     ` kernel test robot
2022-07-15  6:50   ` Christian König
2022-07-15  6:50     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-15  6:50     ` Christian König
2022-07-15  6:50     ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-15  6:59     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  6:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  6:59       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 20:05       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 20:05         ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19 20:05         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20  8:29         ` Christian König
2022-07-20  8:29           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-07-20  8:29           ` Christian König via Virtualization
2022-07-20  8:29           ` Christian König
2022-07-20 12:18           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20 12:18             ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-20 12:18             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] dma-buf: Remove internal lock Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-07-19  9:13 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2022-07-19  9:13   ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention Tomasz Figa
2022-07-19  9:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tomasz Figa
2022-07-19  9:13   ` Tomasz Figa
2022-07-20 15:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAFQd5C0dx5X=VEqXDyj22fbxs1jhOQLLid3vSNfAc9vataPhg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gert.wollny@collabora.com \
    --cc=gurchetansingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.