All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:10:57 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fff2054e5dfc00329804dbd3f2a91667c9a8aff.1623438544.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

linux/processor.h has exactly same defination for spin_until_cond.
Drop the redundant defination in asm/processor.h

Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 That's just a rebase

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index 7bf8a15af224..0819854eeab9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -339,17 +339,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __pack_fe01(unsigned int fpmode)
 
 #define spin_end()	HMT_medium()
 
-#define spin_until_cond(cond)					\
-do {								\
-	if (unlikely(!(cond))) {				\
-		spin_begin();					\
-		do {						\
-			spin_cpu_relax();			\
-		} while (!(cond));				\
-		spin_end();					\
-	}							\
-} while (0)
-
 #endif
 
 /* Check that a certain kernel stack pointer is valid in task_struct p */
-- 
2.25.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:10:57 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fff2054e5dfc00329804dbd3f2a91667c9a8aff.1623438544.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

linux/processor.h has exactly same defination for spin_until_cond.
Drop the redundant defination in asm/processor.h

Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 That's just a rebase

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index 7bf8a15af224..0819854eeab9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -339,17 +339,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __pack_fe01(unsigned int fpmode)
 
 #define spin_end()	HMT_medium()
 
-#define spin_until_cond(cond)					\
-do {								\
-	if (unlikely(!(cond))) {				\
-		spin_begin();					\
-		do {						\
-			spin_cpu_relax();			\
-		} while (!(cond));				\
-		spin_end();					\
-	}							\
-} while (0)
-
 #endif
 
 /* Check that a certain kernel stack pointer is valid in task_struct p */
-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 19:10 Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-06-11 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/watchdog: include linux/processor.h for spin_until_cond Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:10   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond Sudeep Holla
2021-06-11 19:54   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-18  3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-18  3:51   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1fff2054e5dfc00329804dbd3f2a91667c9a8aff.1623438544.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.