From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:54:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611195422.uwtm5px5lr5pkljb@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fff2054e5dfc00329804dbd3f2a91667c9a8aff.1623438544.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 07:10:57PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> linux/processor.h has exactly same defination for spin_until_cond.
> Drop the redundant defination in asm/processor.h
>
Wow you must be real good at ML archaeology, this must have been at-least
3+ years old. I found this when I wanted to you spin_until_cond. Thanks
anyways for digging the original patch, nobody would have remembered even
if you posted fresh 😉.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:54:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611195422.uwtm5px5lr5pkljb@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fff2054e5dfc00329804dbd3f2a91667c9a8aff.1623438544.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 07:10:57PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> linux/processor.h has exactly same defination for spin_until_cond.
> Drop the redundant defination in asm/processor.h
>
Wow you must be real good at ML archaeology, this must have been at-least
3+ years old. I found this when I wanted to you spin_until_cond. Thanks
anyways for digging the original patch, nobody would have remembered even
if you posted fresh 😉.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-11 19:10 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:10 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/watchdog: include linux/processor.h for spin_until_cond Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:10 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11 19:54 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2021-06-11 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: drop redundant defination of spin_until_cond Sudeep Holla
2021-06-18 3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-18 3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210611195422.uwtm5px5lr5pkljb@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.