All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	"Will Deacon" <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ak@linux.intel.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	sam@ravnborg.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Do not allow unaligned accesses when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:38:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110527083806.GA21100@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110526215101.GL24876@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:51:01PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:03:39PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > It is possible that -fconserve-stack is still valuable on ARM given that
> > it is also used with -mno-unaligned-access for other things than
> > structure packing on the stack, and therefore its merits can be debated
> > independently from the alignment issue at hand.
> 
> Catalin said in his mail "I haven't tried with -mno-unaligned-access, I
> suspect the variables on the stack would be aligned.".  So I don't think
> we know enough to say whether -mno-unaligned-access avoids the stack
> packing.

OK, I tried this now:

-fconserve-stack: we get unaligned accesses on the stack because the
newer versions of gcc turned unaligned accesses on by default.

-fconserve-stack -mno-unaligned-access: the stack variables are aligned.
We probably get the benefit of -fconserve-stack as well.

So as per the initial post in this thread, we could have
-mno-unaligned-access on ARM always on (when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP). As
Nicolas suggested, we could compile some files with -munaligned-access
(and maybe -fno-conserve-stack).

I raised this with the gcc guys so they are looking into it. But it
really doesn't look like a gcc bug as long as -mno-unaligned-access is
taken into account.

-- 
Catalin


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Do not allow unaligned accesses when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:38:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110527083806.GA21100@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110526215101.GL24876@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:51:01PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:03:39PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > It is possible that -fconserve-stack is still valuable on ARM given that
> > it is also used with -mno-unaligned-access for other things than
> > structure packing on the stack, and therefore its merits can be debated
> > independently from the alignment issue at hand.
> 
> Catalin said in his mail "I haven't tried with -mno-unaligned-access, I
> suspect the variables on the stack would be aligned.".  So I don't think
> we know enough to say whether -mno-unaligned-access avoids the stack
> packing.

OK, I tried this now:

-fconserve-stack: we get unaligned accesses on the stack because the
newer versions of gcc turned unaligned accesses on by default.

-fconserve-stack -mno-unaligned-access: the stack variables are aligned.
We probably get the benefit of -fconserve-stack as well.

So as per the initial post in this thread, we could have
-mno-unaligned-access on ARM always on (when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP). As
Nicolas suggested, we could compile some files with -munaligned-access
(and maybe -fno-conserve-stack).

I raised this with the gcc guys so they are looking into it. But it
really doesn't look like a gcc bug as long as -mno-unaligned-access is
taken into account.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-27  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-23 11:16 [PATCH] ARM: Do not allow unaligned accesses when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP Catalin Marinas
2011-05-23 12:30 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-23 13:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-23 13:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-23 13:51   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-23 14:37     ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-23 14:41       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-23 14:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-24  9:39   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-24 14:17     ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-24 15:26       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-24 16:23         ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-24 17:26           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-24 17:13         ` Dave Martin
2011-05-25 11:14           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-25 12:43             ` Dave Martin
2011-05-25 13:32               ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-25 14:05                 ` Dave Martin
2011-05-25 14:48                   ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-25 14:50                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-25 14:53                   ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-26 17:10                   ` Will Deacon
2011-05-26 17:10                     ` Will Deacon
2011-05-26 18:14                     ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-26 18:14                       ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-26 19:58                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-26 19:58                       ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-26 21:03                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-26 21:03                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-26 21:10                       ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-26 21:10                         ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-26 21:26                         ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-26 21:26                           ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-27 10:05                         ` Will Deacon
2011-05-27 10:05                           ` Will Deacon
2011-05-27 16:53                           ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-27 16:53                             ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-26 21:51                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 21:51                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 22:29                         ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-26 22:29                           ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-27  8:38                         ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2011-05-27  8:38                           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27  8:54                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-27  8:54                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-27  9:51                             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27  9:51                               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27  9:56                               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27  9:56                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27 12:46                               ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-27 12:46                                 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-05-28 15:34                                 ` [PATCH] Disable -fconserve-stack on ARM Andi Kleen
2011-05-28 15:34                                   ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-31 16:30                                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-31 16:30                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-31 18:01                                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-31 18:01                                       ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-02 13:08                                       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-02 13:08                                         ` Catalin Marinas
     [not found] <mailman.254.1306496353.1533.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
2011-05-27 12:14 ` [PATCH] ARM: Do not allow unaligned accesses when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP Frank Hofmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110527083806.GA21100@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mans@mansr.com \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.