All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>, U-Boot <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Where to put a large bootloader-supplied device tree on ARM ?
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712233801.0411daa7@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFF34C9.8030000@gmail.com>

Hi Rob,

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:34:17 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> [adding u-boot list]
> 
> On 07/12/2012 01:52 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> > On 7/8/2012 6:30 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7/6/2012 3:23 PM, David VomLehn (dvomlehn) wrote:
> >>>> The kernel *must* go where it is linked, but the FDT contains only relative
> >>>> references and is thus free to go anywhere. The same is true of ramdisks,
> >>>> which
> >>>> are usually placed after the kernel.
> >>
> >> The kernel must go where it is linked *only* if you are using the 
> >> 'Image' output.  When using 'zImage' you can put the kernel anywhere in 
> >> memory, or in the first 128MB of RAM if CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR is used.
> >>
> >>> Right, but the kernel image is compressed, so after decompression it expands
> >>> into the area just after it.  Also, the .bss segment is in that vicinity.
> >>
> >> To be exact, the compressed kernel moves itself out of the region where 
> >> the decompressed kernel will end up before doing the decompression, but 
> >> only if necessary.  So it is a good idea to load zImage away from the 
> >> decompressed kernel area to avoid this extra move and save some fraction 
> >> of a second on boot time.
> >>
> >>> There's some code in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S to relocate
> >>> device tree blobs, but it requires CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB which
> >>> is not recommended - arch/arm/Kconfig recommends using the
> >>> documented boot protocol istead .
> >>
> >> This is in case a DTB is appended to zImage.  When the DTB is detected, 
> >> the moving of zImage out of the decompressed area must take care of 
> >> moving the DTB as well.
> >>
> >>> Documentation/arm/Booting says
> >>> to put the dtb "in a region of memory where the kernel decompressor
> >>> will not overwrite it", further recommending the first 16KiB.
> >>>
> >>> As noted, the first 16KiB loses if the dtb is too large.  And
> >>> "where the kernel decompressor will not overwrite it" says what
> >>> won't work, not what will.  It appears that the decompressor works
> >>> out its addresses dynamically, so there's no hard prescription even
> >>> for what to avoid.
> >>
> >> A good rule of thumb is to take the size of the decompressed kernel and 
> >> multiply this by 3.  Rounding up is also fine.  So for example if your 
> >> arch/arm/boot/Image is 5MB, then putting anciliary data such as a 
> >> ramdisk or a large DTB from 16MB into RAM or above should be fine.
> >>
> >>> For now, I'm putting the initrd at the end of memory and the dtb
> >>> below that.  That seems to work, but I'm unsure whether or not
> >>> I'm just "getting lucky".
> >>
> >> That's also perfectly fine.
> > 
> > 
> > Alas, that worked for machines with 512 MiB of main memory, but failed
> > on 1 GiB machines.  My guess is that, when the initrd and dtb are near
> > the top of a 1 GiB memory, the virtual address gets too near the top of
> > the kernel's 1 GiB of virtual space (which starts at 0xc0000000),
> > perhaps colliding with the VMALLOC space.
> > 
> > Putting them just below the 128 MiB boundary seems to work.
> 
> Interesting. I think this is also a problem on u-boot just waiting to
> happen. u-boot locates itself at the end of RAM and likes to copy the
> fdt and initrd to just below that. Any machine with 1G+ is going to hit
> this. I avoided it because I limited u-boot to 512MB on highbank.

If I'm not mistaken, yes U-Boot loads itself as high as it can, and I don't
know about the FDT, but no, U-Boot does not "like" to load initrd "just
below that": it loads initrd where the boot commands tell it to, and the
boot commands are written by board developers. Nothing in U-Boot forces
initrd to be loaded as high as possible.

That leaves the question of the FDT, though -- I'm not familiar enough
with it (yet) to tell if it is always located just under U-Boot or if
its placement is controllable by board commands.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: albert.u.boot@aribaud.net (Albert ARIBAUD)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [U-Boot] Where to put a large bootloader-supplied device tree on ARM ?
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712233801.0411daa7@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFF34C9.8030000@gmail.com>

Hi Rob,

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:34:17 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> [adding u-boot list]
> 
> On 07/12/2012 01:52 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> > On 7/8/2012 6:30 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7/6/2012 3:23 PM, David VomLehn (dvomlehn) wrote:
> >>>> The kernel *must* go where it is linked, but the FDT contains only relative
> >>>> references and is thus free to go anywhere. The same is true of ramdisks,
> >>>> which
> >>>> are usually placed after the kernel.
> >>
> >> The kernel must go where it is linked *only* if you are using the 
> >> 'Image' output.  When using 'zImage' you can put the kernel anywhere in 
> >> memory, or in the first 128MB of RAM if CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR is used.
> >>
> >>> Right, but the kernel image is compressed, so after decompression it expands
> >>> into the area just after it.  Also, the .bss segment is in that vicinity.
> >>
> >> To be exact, the compressed kernel moves itself out of the region where 
> >> the decompressed kernel will end up before doing the decompression, but 
> >> only if necessary.  So it is a good idea to load zImage away from the 
> >> decompressed kernel area to avoid this extra move and save some fraction 
> >> of a second on boot time.
> >>
> >>> There's some code in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S to relocate
> >>> device tree blobs, but it requires CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB which
> >>> is not recommended - arch/arm/Kconfig recommends using the
> >>> documented boot protocol istead .
> >>
> >> This is in case a DTB is appended to zImage.  When the DTB is detected, 
> >> the moving of zImage out of the decompressed area must take care of 
> >> moving the DTB as well.
> >>
> >>> Documentation/arm/Booting says
> >>> to put the dtb "in a region of memory where the kernel decompressor
> >>> will not overwrite it", further recommending the first 16KiB.
> >>>
> >>> As noted, the first 16KiB loses if the dtb is too large.  And
> >>> "where the kernel decompressor will not overwrite it" says what
> >>> won't work, not what will.  It appears that the decompressor works
> >>> out its addresses dynamically, so there's no hard prescription even
> >>> for what to avoid.
> >>
> >> A good rule of thumb is to take the size of the decompressed kernel and 
> >> multiply this by 3.  Rounding up is also fine.  So for example if your 
> >> arch/arm/boot/Image is 5MB, then putting anciliary data such as a 
> >> ramdisk or a large DTB from 16MB into RAM or above should be fine.
> >>
> >>> For now, I'm putting the initrd at the end of memory and the dtb
> >>> below that.  That seems to work, but I'm unsure whether or not
> >>> I'm just "getting lucky".
> >>
> >> That's also perfectly fine.
> > 
> > 
> > Alas, that worked for machines with 512 MiB of main memory, but failed
> > on 1 GiB machines.  My guess is that, when the initrd and dtb are near
> > the top of a 1 GiB memory, the virtual address gets too near the top of
> > the kernel's 1 GiB of virtual space (which starts at 0xc0000000),
> > perhaps colliding with the VMALLOC space.
> > 
> > Putting them just below the 128 MiB boundary seems to work.
> 
> Interesting. I think this is also a problem on u-boot just waiting to
> happen. u-boot locates itself at the end of RAM and likes to copy the
> fdt and initrd to just below that. Any machine with 1G+ is going to hit
> this. I avoided it because I limited u-boot to 512MB on highbank.

If I'm not mistaken, yes U-Boot loads itself as high as it can, and I don't
know about the FDT, but no, U-Boot does not "like" to load initrd "just
below that": it loads initrd where the boot commands tell it to, and the
boot commands are written by board developers. Nothing in U-Boot forces
initrd to be loaded as high as possible.

That leaves the question of the FDT, though -- I'm not familiar enough
with it (yet) to tell if it is always located just under U-Boot or if
its placement is controllable by board commands.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Where to put a large bootloader-supplied device tree on ARM ?
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712233801.0411daa7@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFF34C9.8030000@gmail.com>

Hi Rob,

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:34:17 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> [adding u-boot list]
> 
> On 07/12/2012 01:52 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> > On 7/8/2012 6:30 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7/6/2012 3:23 PM, David VomLehn (dvomlehn) wrote:
> >>>> The kernel *must* go where it is linked, but the FDT contains only relative
> >>>> references and is thus free to go anywhere. The same is true of ramdisks,
> >>>> which
> >>>> are usually placed after the kernel.
> >>
> >> The kernel must go where it is linked *only* if you are using the 
> >> 'Image' output.  When using 'zImage' you can put the kernel anywhere in 
> >> memory, or in the first 128MB of RAM if CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR is used.
> >>
> >>> Right, but the kernel image is compressed, so after decompression it expands
> >>> into the area just after it.  Also, the .bss segment is in that vicinity.
> >>
> >> To be exact, the compressed kernel moves itself out of the region where 
> >> the decompressed kernel will end up before doing the decompression, but 
> >> only if necessary.  So it is a good idea to load zImage away from the 
> >> decompressed kernel area to avoid this extra move and save some fraction 
> >> of a second on boot time.
> >>
> >>> There's some code in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S to relocate
> >>> device tree blobs, but it requires CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB which
> >>> is not recommended - arch/arm/Kconfig recommends using the
> >>> documented boot protocol istead .
> >>
> >> This is in case a DTB is appended to zImage.  When the DTB is detected, 
> >> the moving of zImage out of the decompressed area must take care of 
> >> moving the DTB as well.
> >>
> >>> Documentation/arm/Booting says
> >>> to put the dtb "in a region of memory where the kernel decompressor
> >>> will not overwrite it", further recommending the first 16KiB.
> >>>
> >>> As noted, the first 16KiB loses if the dtb is too large.  And
> >>> "where the kernel decompressor will not overwrite it" says what
> >>> won't work, not what will.  It appears that the decompressor works
> >>> out its addresses dynamically, so there's no hard prescription even
> >>> for what to avoid.
> >>
> >> A good rule of thumb is to take the size of the decompressed kernel and 
> >> multiply this by 3.  Rounding up is also fine.  So for example if your 
> >> arch/arm/boot/Image is 5MB, then putting anciliary data such as a 
> >> ramdisk or a large DTB from 16MB into RAM or above should be fine.
> >>
> >>> For now, I'm putting the initrd at the end of memory and the dtb
> >>> below that.  That seems to work, but I'm unsure whether or not
> >>> I'm just "getting lucky".
> >>
> >> That's also perfectly fine.
> > 
> > 
> > Alas, that worked for machines with 512 MiB of main memory, but failed
> > on 1 GiB machines.  My guess is that, when the initrd and dtb are near
> > the top of a 1 GiB memory, the virtual address gets too near the top of
> > the kernel's 1 GiB of virtual space (which starts at 0xc0000000),
> > perhaps colliding with the VMALLOC space.
> > 
> > Putting them just below the 128 MiB boundary seems to work.
> 
> Interesting. I think this is also a problem on u-boot just waiting to
> happen. u-boot locates itself at the end of RAM and likes to copy the
> fdt and initrd to just below that. Any machine with 1G+ is going to hit
> this. I avoided it because I limited u-boot to 512MB on highbank.

If I'm not mistaken, yes U-Boot loads itself as high as it can, and I don't
know about the FDT, but no, U-Boot does not "like" to load initrd "just
below that": it loads initrd where the boot commands tell it to, and the
boot commands are written by board developers. Nothing in U-Boot forces
initrd to be loaded as high as possible.

That leaves the question of the FDT, though -- I'm not familiar enough
with it (yet) to tell if it is always located just under U-Boot or if
its placement is controllable by board commands.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 130+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03 14:22 [PATCH v2 00/12] IRQ, GPIO SPI, I2C, etc DTC support Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22 ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found] ` <1341325365-21393-1-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ARM: Orion: DT support for IRQ and GPIO Controllers Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05  8:15     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]     ` <1341325365-21393-2-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05  9:02       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05  9:02         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05  9:48         ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05  9:48           ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 10:11           ` Arnaud Patard
2012-07-05 10:11             ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
     [not found]             ` <87sjd6ikkj.fsf-0gaJ4kiyQU6khWr4QmshqB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 10:20               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 10:20                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 10:38                 ` Arnaud Patard
2012-07-05 10:38                   ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
     [not found]                   ` <87liiyijb8.fsf-0gaJ4kiyQU6khWr4QmshqB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 11:42                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 11:42                       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 11:48                       ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 11:48                         ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                         ` <20120705114815.GT17534-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 12:09                           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-07-05 12:09                             ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
     [not found]           ` <20120705094824.GO17534-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 10:10             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 10:10               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 10:25               ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 10:25                 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 12:58             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 12:58               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 13:15               ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:15                 ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                 ` <20120705131522.GW17534-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 13:28                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 13:28                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 13:33                     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:36                       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-05 12:25       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 12:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]         ` <201207051225.55390.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 13:08           ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:08             ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]             ` <20120705130819.GV17534-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 13:47               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 13:47                 ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]                 ` <201207051347.38887.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 13:54                   ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 13:54                     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                     ` <20120705135449.GZ17534-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 15:47                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:47                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 14:14               ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-07-05 14:14                 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
     [not found]                 ` <4FF5A15A.8070309-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 14:43                   ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 14:43                     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 14:54                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 14:54                     ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]                     ` <201207051454.24475.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 15:51                       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-07-05 15:51                         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
     [not found]                         ` <4FF5B7F9.9020507-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 16:30                           ` Arnaud Patard
2012-07-05 16:30                             ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2012-07-05 16:16                       ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05 16:16                         ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                         ` <20120705161600.GA28860-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-06 20:08                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-06 20:08                             ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]                             ` <201207062008.23952.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-06 21:00                               ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-06 21:00                                 ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                                 ` <20120706210009.GC11470-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-07  0:24                                   ` Where to put a large bootloader-supplied device tree on ARM ? Mitch Bradley
2012-07-07  0:24                                     ` Mitch Bradley
     [not found]                                     ` <4FF781D8.3040206-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-07  1:23                                       ` David VomLehn (dvomlehn)
2012-07-07  1:23                                         ` David VomLehn (dvomlehn)
     [not found]                                         ` <2966DB01BC317A4DA23684BA0F653415013701-WE/xwOPrfQKHONfmNwMhBaBKnGwkPULj@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-07  1:59                                           ` Mitch Bradley
2012-07-07  1:59                                             ` Mitch Bradley
     [not found]                                             ` <4FF7980E.7050705-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-09  4:30                                               ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-07-09  4:30                                                 ` Nicolas Pitre
     [not found]                                                 ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207090015270.31100-QuJgVwGFrdf/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12  6:52                                                   ` Mitch Bradley
2012-07-12  6:52                                                     ` Mitch Bradley
     [not found]                                                     ` <4FFE743B.6080504-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 18:16                                                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-07-12 18:16                                                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-07-12 20:34                                                     ` Rob Herring
2012-07-12 20:34                                                       ` [U-Boot] " Rob Herring
2012-07-12 20:34                                                       ` Rob Herring
2012-07-12 21:38                                                       ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2012-07-12 21:38                                                         ` [U-Boot] " Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-12 21:38                                                         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-12 21:47                                                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-07-12 21:47                                                           ` [U-Boot] " Wolfgang Denk
2012-07-12 21:47                                                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-07-13  1:28                                                           ` Rob Herring
2012-07-13  1:28                                                             ` [U-Boot] " Rob Herring
2012-07-13  1:28                                                             ` Rob Herring
     [not found]                                                             ` <4FFF79B6.6040508-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13  6:45                                                               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-13  6:45                                                                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-13  6:45                                                                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-05 18:36                       ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ARM: Orion: DT support for IRQ and GPIO Controllers Mitch Bradley
2012-07-05 18:36                         ` Mitch Bradley
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 02/12] SPI: Refactor spi-orion to use SPI framework queue Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 03/12] spi-orion: remove uneeded spi_info Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 04/12] spi-orion: add device tree binding Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 05/12] ARM: kirkwood: use devicetree for orion-spi Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 06/12] ARM: kirkwood: use devicetree for SPI on dreamplug Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 07/12] I2C: MV64XXX: Add Device Tree support Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]     ` <1341325365-21393-8-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-03 15:59       ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 15:59         ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 16:58         ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 16:58           ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]           ` <20120703165839.GA1519-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-04 19:49             ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-04 19:49               ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-05  6:52               ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-05  6:52                 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 08/12] Kirkwood: Add basic device tree support for QNAP TS219 Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]     ` <1341325365-21393-9-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-03 15:47       ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 15:47         ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 17:09         ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 17:09           ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 09/12] ARM: Kirkwood: DTify the watchdog timer Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ATA: sata_mv: Add device tree support Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ARM: Kirkwood: Use DT to configure SATA device Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]     ` <1341325365-21393-12-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-03 14:52       ` Josh Coombs
2012-07-03 14:52         ` Josh Coombs
     [not found]         ` <CAMW5Ufa2bsYs9VD2g9hJWKpcQNcZt+WXCA1ohYoHeLk9SambSg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-03 15:32           ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 15:32             ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22   ` [PATCH v2 12/12] Crypto: CESA: Add support for DT based instantiation Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 14:22     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]     ` <1341325365-21393-13-git-send-email-andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-03 15:50       ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 15:50         ` Florian Fainelli
2012-07-03 17:03         ` Andrew Lunn
2012-07-03 17:03           ` Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120712233801.0411daa7@lilith \
    --to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=wmb@firmworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.