From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
aletes.xgr@gmail.com, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
srinivas.bakki@nxp.com,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:18:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905231821.GG32084@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503A3402.7090508@antcom.de>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:34:42PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 26/08/12 06:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 24 August 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> On 23/08/12 14:22, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >>> This patch removes the ARM architecture mach-pnx4008. No direct support or user
> >>> feedback since 2006. Acknowledgements from NXP/Philips and Linux arm-soc
> >>> maintainers.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> >>
> >> The patch was a bit too big for the mailing list - sorry.
> >>
> >> Now re-proposing via pull request, below.
> >
> > I think the removal of the frame buffer driver should go separately via the
> > framebuffer maintainer (Florian Schandinat), I can take the rest through the
> > arm-soc tree.
>
> Fine - consider the new pull request for arch-pnx4008, below.
>
> (Patch for video is separate, now.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roland
>
>
> The following changes since commit fea7a08acb13524b47711625eebea40a0ede69a0:
>
> Linux 3.6-rc3 (2012-08-22 13:29:06 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.antcom.de/linux-2.6.git pnx4008-removal
Thanks, pulled into next/cleanup. If we can get an Ack out of the FB maintainer
for the driver removal we can pick that up too, or it can go in through his
tree.
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:18:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905231821.GG32084@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503A3402.7090508@antcom.de>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:34:42PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 26/08/12 06:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 24 August 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> On 23/08/12 14:22, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >>> This patch removes the ARM architecture mach-pnx4008. No direct support or user
> >>> feedback since 2006. Acknowledgements from NXP/Philips and Linux arm-soc
> >>> maintainers.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> >>
> >> The patch was a bit too big for the mailing list - sorry.
> >>
> >> Now re-proposing via pull request, below.
> >
> > I think the removal of the frame buffer driver should go separately via the
> > framebuffer maintainer (Florian Schandinat), I can take the rest through the
> > arm-soc tree.
>
> Fine - consider the new pull request for arch-pnx4008, below.
>
> (Patch for video is separate, now.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roland
>
>
> The following changes since commit fea7a08acb13524b47711625eebea40a0ede69a0:
>
> Linux 3.6-rc3 (2012-08-22 13:29:06 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.antcom.de/linux-2.6.git pnx4008-removal
Thanks, pulled into next/cleanup. If we can get an Ack out of the FB maintainer
for the driver removal we can pick that up too, or it can go in through his
tree.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 12:22 [PATCH] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture Roland Stigge
2012-08-23 12:22 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-24 13:24 ` [GIT PULL] " Roland Stigge
2012-08-24 13:24 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-26 4:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-26 4:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-26 14:34 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-26 14:34 ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-05 23:18 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2012-09-05 23:18 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905231821.GG32084@quad.lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=aletes.xgr@gmail.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=kevin.wells@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.bakki@nxp.com \
--cc=stigge@antcom.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.