From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel: compile pcm driver in snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:19:02 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20150527091902.GN3199@piout.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1432713024.27695.235.camel@x220> On 27/05/2015 at 09:50:24 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote : > Now that this patch is already applied my remarks can only be addressed > in a follow up patch. (Perhaps such a patch is already queued.) > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 00:04 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > --- a/sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig > > +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig > > > config SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC > > - tristate > > + bool > > > > config SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA > > - tristate > > + bool > > select SND_SOC_GENERIC_DMAENGINE_PCM > > > --- a/sound/soc/atmel/Makefile > > +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/Makefile > > > -snd-soc-atmel-pcm-pdc-objs := atmel-pcm-pdc.o > > -snd-soc-atmel-pcm-dma-objs := atmel-pcm-dma.o > > -snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai-objs := atmel_ssc_dai.o > > +snd-soc-atmel-pcm-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC) := atmel-pcm-pdc.o > > +snd-soc-atmel-pcm-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA) += atmel-pcm-dma.o > > +snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai-objs := atmel_ssc_dai.o $(snd-soc-atmel-pcm-y) > > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-pdc.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-dma.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC) += snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai.o > > The code in atmel-pcm-pdc.c and atmel-pcm-dma.c will now either be part > of the snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai.ko or be built-in. That means, I think, > that: > - the (in total) four uses of EXPORT_SYMBOL() in these two files can be > dropped; > - MODULE_AUTHOR() and friends, and probably also the include of > linux/module.h, can be dropped from these two files. > Yeah, I as not sure how to merge those MODULE_AUTHOR but I checked and the information is correctly included. > Furthermore, the references to CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC_MODULE and > CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA_MODULE in atmel-pcm.h can be removed now. > Indeed. However, the Kconfig maintainer found a way to do the right thing so we may as well drop that patch and keep those as modules. Nicolas, what do you think? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel: compile pcm driver in snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:19:02 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20150527091902.GN3199@piout.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1432713024.27695.235.camel@x220> On 27/05/2015 at 09:50:24 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote : > Now that this patch is already applied my remarks can only be addressed > in a follow up patch. (Perhaps such a patch is already queued.) > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 00:04 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > --- a/sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig > > +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig > > > config SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC > > - tristate > > + bool > > > > config SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA > > - tristate > > + bool > > select SND_SOC_GENERIC_DMAENGINE_PCM > > > --- a/sound/soc/atmel/Makefile > > +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/Makefile > > > -snd-soc-atmel-pcm-pdc-objs := atmel-pcm-pdc.o > > -snd-soc-atmel-pcm-dma-objs := atmel-pcm-dma.o > > -snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai-objs := atmel_ssc_dai.o > > +snd-soc-atmel-pcm-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC) := atmel-pcm-pdc.o > > +snd-soc-atmel-pcm-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA) += atmel-pcm-dma.o > > +snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai-objs := atmel_ssc_dai.o $(snd-soc-atmel-pcm-y) > > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-pdc.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-dma.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC) += snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai.o > > The code in atmel-pcm-pdc.c and atmel-pcm-dma.c will now either be part > of the snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai.ko or be built-in. That means, I think, > that: > - the (in total) four uses of EXPORT_SYMBOL() in these two files can be > dropped; > - MODULE_AUTHOR() and friends, and probably also the include of > linux/module.h, can be dropped from these two files. > Yeah, I as not sure how to merge those MODULE_AUTHOR but I checked and the information is correctly included. > Furthermore, the references to CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC_MODULE and > CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA_MODULE in atmel-pcm.h can be removed now. > Indeed. However, the Kconfig maintainer found a way to do the right thing so we may as well drop that patch and keep those as modules. Nicolas, what do you think? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 9:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-05-25 22:04 [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel: simplify Kconfig Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-25 22:04 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-25 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel: compile pcm driver in snd-soc-atmel_ssc_dai Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-25 22:04 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-26 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2015-05-26 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2015-05-26 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2015-05-26 10:14 ` Nicolas Ferre 2015-05-26 10:14 ` Nicolas Ferre 2015-05-26 10:14 ` Nicolas Ferre 2015-05-26 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann 2015-05-26 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann 2015-05-26 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann 2015-05-27 7:50 ` Paul Bolle 2015-05-27 7:50 ` Paul Bolle 2015-05-27 9:19 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message] 2015-05-27 9:19 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-27 9:25 ` Paul Bolle 2015-05-27 9:25 ` Paul Bolle 2015-05-28 9:36 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-28 9:36 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-05-26 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel: simplify Kconfig Mark Brown 2015-05-26 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2015-05-26 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2015-05-26 10:13 ` Nicolas Ferre 2015-05-26 10:13 ` Nicolas Ferre 2015-05-26 10:13 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20150527091902.GN3199@piout.net \ --to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \ --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \ --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.