All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, gleb@kernel.org,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/33] nvdimm acpi: support DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED function
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:05:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151018205030-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445216059-88521-29-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:54:14AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> __DSM is defined in ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method)
> 
> Function 0 is a query function. We do not support any function on root
> device and only 3 functions are support for NVDIMM device,
> DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE, DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA and
> DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA, that means we currently only allow to
> access device's Label Namespace
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 182 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> index b211b8b..37fea1c 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,22 @@ static uint32_t nvdimm_slot_to_dcr_index(int slot)
>      return nvdimm_slot_to_spa_index(slot) + 1;
>  }
>  
> +static NVDIMMDevice
> +*nvdimm_get_device_by_handle(GSList *list, uint32_t handle)
> +{
> +    for (; list; list = list->next) {
> +        NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = list->data;
> +        int slot = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(nvdimm), DIMM_SLOT_PROP,
> +                                           NULL);
> +
> +        if (nvdimm_slot_to_handle(slot) == handle) {
> +            return nvdimm;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Please refer to ACPI 6.0: 5.2.25.1 System Physical Address Range
>   * Structure
> @@ -411,6 +427,60 @@ static void nvdimm_build_nfit(GArray *structures, GArray *table_offsets,
>  /* detailed _DSM design please refer to docs/specs/acpi_nvdimm.txt */
>  #define NOTIFY_VALUE      0x99

Again, please prefix everything consistently.

>  
> +enum {
> +    DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED = 0,
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Root Device Functions */
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_FUN_ARS_CAP = 1,
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_FUN_ARS_START = 2,
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_FUN_ARS_QUERY = 3,
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Device (non-root) Functions */
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_SMART = 1,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_SMART_THRESHOLD = 2,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_BLOCK_NVDIMM_FLAGS = 3,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE = 4,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA = 5,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA = 6,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_VENDOR_EFFECT_LOG_SIZE = 7,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_VENDOR_EFFECT_LOG = 8,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_VENDOR_SPECIFIC = 9,
> +};

Does FUN stand for "function"? FUNC or FN is probably better.

Please list exact names as they appear in spec so
they can be searched for.



> +
> +enum {
> +    /* Common return status codes. */
> +    DSM_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0,                   /* Success */
> +    DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED = 1,             /* Not Supported */
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Root Device _DSM function return status codes*/
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS = 2,    /* Invalid Input Parameters */
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_STATUS_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_ERROR = 3, /* Function-Specific
> +                                                        Error */
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Device (non-root) _DSM function return status codes*/
> +    DSM_DEV_STATUS_NON_EXISTING_MEM_DEV = 2,  /* Non-Existing Memory Device */
> +    DSM_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS = 3,         /* Invalid Input Parameters */
> +    DSM_DEV_STATUS_VENDOR_SPECIFIC_ERROR = 4, /* Vendor Specific Error */
> +};
> +
> +/* Current revision supported by DSM specification is 1. */
> +#define DSM_REVISION        (1)
> +
> +/*
> + * please refer to ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method): Return
> + * Value Information:

Drop "please refer to".

> + *   if set to zero, no functions are supported (other than function zero)
> + *   for the specified UUID and Revision ID. If set to one, at least one
> + *   additional function is supported.
> + */
> +
> +/* do not support any function on root. */
> +#define ROOT_SUPPORT_FUN     (0ULL)

Needs a name that implies the comment somehow.

> +#define DIMM_SUPPORT_FUN    ((1 << DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED)                   \
> +                           | (1 << DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE)      \
> +                           | (1 << DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA)  \
> +                           | (1 << DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA))
> +

I think it's best to just drop these macros.
There's a single point of use - just add a comment there
explaining what does it mean.
You will be able to drop all _FUN_ macros too.


>  struct dsm_in {
>      uint32_t handle;
>      uint32_t revision;
> @@ -420,6 +490,11 @@ struct dsm_in {
>  } QEMU_PACKED;
>  typedef struct dsm_in dsm_in;
>  
> +struct cmd_out_implemented {
> +    uint64_t cmd_list;
> +};
> +typedef struct cmd_out_implemented cmd_out_implemented;
> +
>  struct dsm_out {
>      /* the size of buffer filled by QEMU. */
>      uint32_t len;
> @@ -434,12 +509,115 @@ nvdimm_dsm_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void nvdimm_dsm_write_status(GArray *out, uint32_t status)
> +{
> +    /* status locates in the first 4 bytes in the dsm memory. */

located?

> +    assert(!out->len);


But dsm itself can be part of a bigger table.
So don't do it.

> +
> +    status = cpu_to_le32(status);
> +    g_array_append_vals(out, &status, sizeof(status));

I think this should just use the (unfortunately named)
build_append_int_noprefix. Same applied everywhere
where you add single values.

> +}
> +
> +static void nvdimm_dsm_write_root(dsm_in *in, GArray *out)
> +{
> +    uint32_t status = DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +
> +    /* please refer to ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method) */
> +    if (in->function == DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED) {
> +        uint64_t cmd_list = cpu_to_le64(ROOT_SUPPORT_FUN);

see about about single use values.


> +
> +        g_array_append_vals(out, &cmd_list, sizeof(cmd_list));
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    nvdimm_debug("Return status %#x.\n", status);
> +    nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, status);
> +}
> +
> +static void nvdimm_dsm_write_nvdimm(dsm_in *in, GArray *out)
> +{
> +    GSList *list = nvdimm_get_plugged_device_list();
> +    NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = nvdimm_get_device_by_handle(list, in->handle);
> +    uint32_t status = DSM_DEV_STATUS_NON_EXISTING_MEM_DEV;
> +    uint64_t cmd_list;
> +
> +    if (!nvdimm) {
> +        goto set_status_free;
> +    }
> +
> +    switch (in->function) {
> +    /* please refer to ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method) */
> +    case DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED:
> +        cmd_list = cpu_to_le64(DIMM_SUPPORT_FUN);
> +        g_array_append_vals(out, &cmd_list, sizeof(cmd_list));
> +        goto free;
> +    default:
> +        status = DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +    };
> +
> +set_status_free:
> +    nvdimm_debug("Return status %#x.\n", status);
> +    nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, status);
> +free:
> +    g_slist_free(list);
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  nvdimm_dsm_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, unsigned size)
>  {
> +    NVDIMMState *state = opaque;
> +    MemoryRegion *dsm_ram_mr;
> +    dsm_in *in;
> +    GArray *out;
> +    void *dsm_ram_addr;


Why don't you give this the correct type? Will avoid need for casts.

> +
>      if (val != NOTIFY_VALUE) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "BUG: unexepected notify value 0x%" PRIx64, val);
>      }
> +
> +    dsm_ram_mr = memory_region_find(&state->mr, getpagesize(),
> +                                    getpagesize()).mr;
> +    dsm_ram_addr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(dsm_ram_mr);


This needs a validity check for size.

> +
> +    /*
> +     * copy all input data to our local memory to avoid potential issue
> +     * as the dsm memory is visible to guest.

this comment doesn't help.
pls replace "potential issue" with an explanation.

> +     */
> +    in = g_malloc(memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr));
> +    memcpy(in, dsm_ram_addr, memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr));
> +
> +    le32_to_cpus(&in->revision);
> +    le32_to_cpus(&in->function);
> +    le32_to_cpus(&in->handle);
> +
> +    nvdimm_debug("Revision %#x Handler %#x Function %#x.\n", in->revision,
> +                 in->handle, in->function);
> +
> +    out = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1);
> +
> +    if (in->revision != DSM_REVISION) {
> +        nvdimm_debug("Revision %#x is not supported, expect %#x.\n",
> +                      in->revision, DSM_REVISION);
> +        nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED);
> +        goto exit;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Handle 0 is reserved for NVDIMM Root Device. */
> +    if (!in->handle) {
> +        nvdimm_dsm_write_root(in, out);
> +        goto exit;
> +    }
> +
> +    nvdimm_dsm_write_nvdimm(in, out);
> +
> +exit:
> +    /* Write our output result to dsm memory. */
> +    ((dsm_out *)dsm_ram_addr)->len = out->len;
> +    memcpy(((dsm_out *)dsm_ram_addr)->data, out->data, out->len);

This breaks migration as memory is not dirtied.

address_space_write is generally preferable to change memory.



> +
> +    g_free(in);
> +    g_array_free(out, true);
> +    memory_region_unref(dsm_ram_mr);
>  }
>  
>  static const MemoryRegionOps nvdimm_dsm_ops = {
> @@ -547,7 +725,8 @@ static void build_nvdimm_devices(NVDIMMState *state, GSList *device_list,
>           */
>          BUILD_DSM_METHOD(dev, method,
>                           handle /* NVDIMM Device Handle */,
> -                         3 /* Invalid Input Parameters */,
> +                         DSM_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS, /* error code if UUID
> +                                                         is not matched. */
>                           "4309AC30-0D11-11E4-9191-0800200C9A66"
>                           /* UUID for NVDIMM Devices. */);
>  
> @@ -669,7 +848,8 @@ static void nvdimm_build_acpi_devices(NVDIMMState *state, GSList *device_list,
>       */
>      BUILD_DSM_METHOD(dev, method,
>                       0 /* 0 is reserved for NVDIMM Root Device*/,
> -                     2 /* Invalid Input Parameters */,
> +                     DSM_ROOT_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS, /* error code if
> +                                                     UUID is not matched. */
>                       "2F10E7A4-9E91-11E4-89D3-123B93F75CBA"
>                       /* UUID for NVDIMM Root Devices. */);
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@kernel.org,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	imammedo@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 28/33] nvdimm acpi: support DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED function
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:05:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151018205030-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445216059-88521-29-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:54:14AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> __DSM is defined in ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method)
> 
> Function 0 is a query function. We do not support any function on root
> device and only 3 functions are support for NVDIMM device,
> DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE, DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA and
> DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA, that means we currently only allow to
> access device's Label Namespace
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 182 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> index b211b8b..37fea1c 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,22 @@ static uint32_t nvdimm_slot_to_dcr_index(int slot)
>      return nvdimm_slot_to_spa_index(slot) + 1;
>  }
>  
> +static NVDIMMDevice
> +*nvdimm_get_device_by_handle(GSList *list, uint32_t handle)
> +{
> +    for (; list; list = list->next) {
> +        NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = list->data;
> +        int slot = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(nvdimm), DIMM_SLOT_PROP,
> +                                           NULL);
> +
> +        if (nvdimm_slot_to_handle(slot) == handle) {
> +            return nvdimm;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Please refer to ACPI 6.0: 5.2.25.1 System Physical Address Range
>   * Structure
> @@ -411,6 +427,60 @@ static void nvdimm_build_nfit(GArray *structures, GArray *table_offsets,
>  /* detailed _DSM design please refer to docs/specs/acpi_nvdimm.txt */
>  #define NOTIFY_VALUE      0x99

Again, please prefix everything consistently.

>  
> +enum {
> +    DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED = 0,
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Root Device Functions */
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_FUN_ARS_CAP = 1,
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_FUN_ARS_START = 2,
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_FUN_ARS_QUERY = 3,
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Device (non-root) Functions */
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_SMART = 1,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_SMART_THRESHOLD = 2,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_BLOCK_NVDIMM_FLAGS = 3,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE = 4,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA = 5,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA = 6,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_VENDOR_EFFECT_LOG_SIZE = 7,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_VENDOR_EFFECT_LOG = 8,
> +    DSM_DEV_FUN_VENDOR_SPECIFIC = 9,
> +};

Does FUN stand for "function"? FUNC or FN is probably better.

Please list exact names as they appear in spec so
they can be searched for.



> +
> +enum {
> +    /* Common return status codes. */
> +    DSM_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0,                   /* Success */
> +    DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED = 1,             /* Not Supported */
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Root Device _DSM function return status codes*/
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS = 2,    /* Invalid Input Parameters */
> +    DSM_ROOT_DEV_STATUS_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_ERROR = 3, /* Function-Specific
> +                                                        Error */
> +
> +    /* NVDIMM Device (non-root) _DSM function return status codes*/
> +    DSM_DEV_STATUS_NON_EXISTING_MEM_DEV = 2,  /* Non-Existing Memory Device */
> +    DSM_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS = 3,         /* Invalid Input Parameters */
> +    DSM_DEV_STATUS_VENDOR_SPECIFIC_ERROR = 4, /* Vendor Specific Error */
> +};
> +
> +/* Current revision supported by DSM specification is 1. */
> +#define DSM_REVISION        (1)
> +
> +/*
> + * please refer to ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method): Return
> + * Value Information:

Drop "please refer to".

> + *   if set to zero, no functions are supported (other than function zero)
> + *   for the specified UUID and Revision ID. If set to one, at least one
> + *   additional function is supported.
> + */
> +
> +/* do not support any function on root. */
> +#define ROOT_SUPPORT_FUN     (0ULL)

Needs a name that implies the comment somehow.

> +#define DIMM_SUPPORT_FUN    ((1 << DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED)                   \
> +                           | (1 << DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE)      \
> +                           | (1 << DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA)  \
> +                           | (1 << DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA))
> +

I think it's best to just drop these macros.
There's a single point of use - just add a comment there
explaining what does it mean.
You will be able to drop all _FUN_ macros too.


>  struct dsm_in {
>      uint32_t handle;
>      uint32_t revision;
> @@ -420,6 +490,11 @@ struct dsm_in {
>  } QEMU_PACKED;
>  typedef struct dsm_in dsm_in;
>  
> +struct cmd_out_implemented {
> +    uint64_t cmd_list;
> +};
> +typedef struct cmd_out_implemented cmd_out_implemented;
> +
>  struct dsm_out {
>      /* the size of buffer filled by QEMU. */
>      uint32_t len;
> @@ -434,12 +509,115 @@ nvdimm_dsm_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void nvdimm_dsm_write_status(GArray *out, uint32_t status)
> +{
> +    /* status locates in the first 4 bytes in the dsm memory. */

located?

> +    assert(!out->len);


But dsm itself can be part of a bigger table.
So don't do it.

> +
> +    status = cpu_to_le32(status);
> +    g_array_append_vals(out, &status, sizeof(status));

I think this should just use the (unfortunately named)
build_append_int_noprefix. Same applied everywhere
where you add single values.

> +}
> +
> +static void nvdimm_dsm_write_root(dsm_in *in, GArray *out)
> +{
> +    uint32_t status = DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +
> +    /* please refer to ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method) */
> +    if (in->function == DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED) {
> +        uint64_t cmd_list = cpu_to_le64(ROOT_SUPPORT_FUN);

see about about single use values.


> +
> +        g_array_append_vals(out, &cmd_list, sizeof(cmd_list));
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    nvdimm_debug("Return status %#x.\n", status);
> +    nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, status);
> +}
> +
> +static void nvdimm_dsm_write_nvdimm(dsm_in *in, GArray *out)
> +{
> +    GSList *list = nvdimm_get_plugged_device_list();
> +    NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = nvdimm_get_device_by_handle(list, in->handle);
> +    uint32_t status = DSM_DEV_STATUS_NON_EXISTING_MEM_DEV;
> +    uint64_t cmd_list;
> +
> +    if (!nvdimm) {
> +        goto set_status_free;
> +    }
> +
> +    switch (in->function) {
> +    /* please refer to ACPI 6.0: 9.14.1 _DSM (Device Specific Method) */
> +    case DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED:
> +        cmd_list = cpu_to_le64(DIMM_SUPPORT_FUN);
> +        g_array_append_vals(out, &cmd_list, sizeof(cmd_list));
> +        goto free;
> +    default:
> +        status = DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +    };
> +
> +set_status_free:
> +    nvdimm_debug("Return status %#x.\n", status);
> +    nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, status);
> +free:
> +    g_slist_free(list);
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  nvdimm_dsm_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, unsigned size)
>  {
> +    NVDIMMState *state = opaque;
> +    MemoryRegion *dsm_ram_mr;
> +    dsm_in *in;
> +    GArray *out;
> +    void *dsm_ram_addr;


Why don't you give this the correct type? Will avoid need for casts.

> +
>      if (val != NOTIFY_VALUE) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "BUG: unexepected notify value 0x%" PRIx64, val);
>      }
> +
> +    dsm_ram_mr = memory_region_find(&state->mr, getpagesize(),
> +                                    getpagesize()).mr;
> +    dsm_ram_addr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(dsm_ram_mr);


This needs a validity check for size.

> +
> +    /*
> +     * copy all input data to our local memory to avoid potential issue
> +     * as the dsm memory is visible to guest.

this comment doesn't help.
pls replace "potential issue" with an explanation.

> +     */
> +    in = g_malloc(memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr));
> +    memcpy(in, dsm_ram_addr, memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr));
> +
> +    le32_to_cpus(&in->revision);
> +    le32_to_cpus(&in->function);
> +    le32_to_cpus(&in->handle);
> +
> +    nvdimm_debug("Revision %#x Handler %#x Function %#x.\n", in->revision,
> +                 in->handle, in->function);
> +
> +    out = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1);
> +
> +    if (in->revision != DSM_REVISION) {
> +        nvdimm_debug("Revision %#x is not supported, expect %#x.\n",
> +                      in->revision, DSM_REVISION);
> +        nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED);
> +        goto exit;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Handle 0 is reserved for NVDIMM Root Device. */
> +    if (!in->handle) {
> +        nvdimm_dsm_write_root(in, out);
> +        goto exit;
> +    }
> +
> +    nvdimm_dsm_write_nvdimm(in, out);
> +
> +exit:
> +    /* Write our output result to dsm memory. */
> +    ((dsm_out *)dsm_ram_addr)->len = out->len;
> +    memcpy(((dsm_out *)dsm_ram_addr)->data, out->data, out->len);

This breaks migration as memory is not dirtied.

address_space_write is generally preferable to change memory.



> +
> +    g_free(in);
> +    g_array_free(out, true);
> +    memory_region_unref(dsm_ram_mr);
>  }
>  
>  static const MemoryRegionOps nvdimm_dsm_ops = {
> @@ -547,7 +725,8 @@ static void build_nvdimm_devices(NVDIMMState *state, GSList *device_list,
>           */
>          BUILD_DSM_METHOD(dev, method,
>                           handle /* NVDIMM Device Handle */,
> -                         3 /* Invalid Input Parameters */,
> +                         DSM_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS, /* error code if UUID
> +                                                         is not matched. */
>                           "4309AC30-0D11-11E4-9191-0800200C9A66"
>                           /* UUID for NVDIMM Devices. */);
>  
> @@ -669,7 +848,8 @@ static void nvdimm_build_acpi_devices(NVDIMMState *state, GSList *device_list,
>       */
>      BUILD_DSM_METHOD(dev, method,
>                       0 /* 0 is reserved for NVDIMM Root Device*/,
> -                     2 /* Invalid Input Parameters */,
> +                     DSM_ROOT_DEV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAS, /* error code if
> +                                                     UUID is not matched. */
>                       "2F10E7A4-9E91-11E4-89D3-123B93F75CBA"
>                       /* UUID for NVDIMM Root Devices. */);
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-18 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19  0:53 [PATCH v4 00/33] implement vNVDIMM Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/33] acpi: add aml_derefof Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/33] acpi: add aml_sizeof Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/33] acpi: add aml_create_field Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/33] acpi: add aml_concatenate Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/33] acpi: add aml_object_type Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/33] acpi: add aml_method_serialized Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/33] util: introduce qemu_file_get_page_size() Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/33] exec: allow memory to be allocated from any kind of path Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/33] exec: allow file_ram_alloc to work on file Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 10/33] hostmem-file: clean up memory allocation Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 11/33] hostmem-file: use whole file size if possible Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 12/33] pc-dimm: remove DEFAULT_PC_DIMMSIZE Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 13/33] pc-dimm: make pc_existing_dimms_capacity static and rename it Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 14/33] pc-dimm: drop the prefix of pc-dimm Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 15/33] stubs: rename qmp_pc_dimm_device_list.c Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 16/33] pc-dimm: rename pc-dimm.c and pc-dimm.h Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 17/33] dimm: abstract dimm device from pc-dimm Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-24  3:20   ` Bharata B Rao
2015-10-24  3:20     ` [Qemu-devel] " Bharata B Rao
2015-10-28 14:31     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-28 14:31       ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 18/33] dimm: get mapped memory region from DIMMDeviceClass->get_memory_region Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 19/33] dimm: keep the state of the whole backend memory Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 20/33] dimm: introduce realize callback Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 21/33] nvdimm: implement NVDIMM device abstract Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 22/33] docs: add NVDIMM ACPI documentation Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 23/33] nvdimm acpi: init the address region used by NVDIMM ACPI Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-18 17:15   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-18 17:15     ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  3:58     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  3:58       ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 24/33] nvdimm acpi: build ACPI NFIT table Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 25/33] nvdimm acpi: init the address region used by DSM Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 26/33] nvdimm acpi: build ACPI nvdimm devices Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 27/33] nvdimm acpi: save arg3 for NVDIMM device _DSM method Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-18 17:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-18 17:16     ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  4:04     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  4:04       ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  6:57       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  6:57         ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  7:09       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  7:09         ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19 17:29         ` Dan Williams
2015-10-19 17:29           ` [Qemu-devel] " Dan Williams
2015-10-19 21:19           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19 21:19             ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19 21:29             ` Dan Williams
2015-10-19 21:29               ` [Qemu-devel] " Dan Williams
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 28/33] nvdimm acpi: support DSM_FUN_IMPLEMENTED function Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-18 18:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-10-18 18:05     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  4:39     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  4:39       ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  7:06       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  7:06         ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-19  7:39         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  7:39           ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-20 15:51   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-20 15:51     ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-20 16:05     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-20 16:05       ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-20 16:26     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-20 16:26       ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-20 16:29       ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-20 16:29         ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-21 10:49       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-21 10:49         ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-21 13:32         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-21 13:32           ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-29 14:36           ` Igor Mammedov
2015-10-29 14:36             ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 29/33] nvdimm acpi: support DSM_DEV_FUN_NAMESPACE_LABEL_SIZE function Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 30/33] nvdimm acpi: support DSM_DEV_FUN_GET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 31/33] nvdimm acpi: support DSM_DEV_FUN_SET_NAMESPACE_LABEL_DATA Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 32/33] nvdimm: allow using whole backend memory as pmem Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54 ` [PATCH v4 33/33] nvdimm: add maintain info Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-19  0:54   ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151018205030-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.