From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Will.Deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org,
rfranz@cavium.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, steve.capper@linaro.org,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@r
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] arm64, numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:52:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126185238.GB17600@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453134965-6125-2-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:06:00PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Adding numa support for arm64 based platforms.
> This patch adds by default the dummy numa node and
> maps all memory and cpus to node 0.
> using this patch, numa can be simulated on single node arm64 platforms.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2cd804d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
Are all these #includes really necessary? s390 looks very similar and
doesn't need the #includes.
> +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
> +
> +#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[(nid)])
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f28f15b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_NUMA_H
> +
> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +/* currently, arm64 implements flat NUMA topology */
> +#define parent_node(node) (node)
> +
> +extern int __node_distance(int from, int to);
Below you add some extern function declarations without the "extern"
keyword. I don't know what the convention is for arm64 (I omit the
"extern" for PCI), but it seems like you should at least be
consistent.
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS];
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +extern void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +extern const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Will.Deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org,
rfranz@cavium.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, steve.capper@linaro.org,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, jonathan@jonmasters.org, rrichter@cavium.com,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, gpkulkarni@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] arm64, numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:52:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126185238.GB17600@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453134965-6125-2-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:06:00PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Adding numa support for arm64 based platforms.
> This patch adds by default the dummy numa node and
> maps all memory and cpus to node 0.
> using this patch, numa can be simulated on single node arm64 platforms.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2cd804d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
Are all these #includes really necessary? s390 looks very similar and
doesn't need the #includes.
> +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
> +
> +#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[(nid)])
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f28f15b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_NUMA_H
> +
> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +/* currently, arm64 implements flat NUMA topology */
> +#define parent_node(node) (node)
> +
> +extern int __node_distance(int from, int to);
Below you add some extern function declarations without the "extern"
keyword. I don't know what the convention is for arm64 (I omit the
"extern" for PCI), but it seems like you should at least be
consistent.
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS];
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +extern void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +extern const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Will.Deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org,
rfranz@cavium.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, steve.capper@linaro.org,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@r
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] arm64, numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:52:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126185238.GB17600@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453134965-6125-2-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:06:00PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Adding numa support for arm64 based platforms.
> This patch adds by default the dummy numa node and
> maps all memory and cpus to node 0.
> using this patch, numa can be simulated on single node arm64 platforms.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2cd804d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
Are all these #includes really necessary? s390 looks very similar and
doesn't need the #includes.
> +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
> +
> +#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[(nid)])
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f28f15b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_NUMA_H
> +
> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +/* currently, arm64 implements flat NUMA topology */
> +#define parent_node(node) (node)
> +
> +extern int __node_distance(int from, int to);
Below you add some extern function declarations without the "extern"
keyword. I don't know what the convention is for arm64 (I omit the
"extern" for PCI), but it seems like you should at least be
consistent.
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS];
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +extern void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +extern const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/6] arm64, numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:52:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126185238.GB17600@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453134965-6125-2-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:06:00PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Adding numa support for arm64 based platforms.
> This patch adds by default the dummy numa node and
> maps all memory and cpus to node 0.
> using this patch, numa can be simulated on single node arm64 platforms.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2cd804d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
Are all these #includes really necessary? s390 looks very similar and
doesn't need the #includes.
> +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
> +
> +#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[(nid)])
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f28f15b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_NUMA_H
> +
> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
> +#include <asm/topology.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +/* currently, arm64 implements flat NUMA topology */
> +#define parent_node(node) (node)
> +
> +extern int __node_distance(int from, int to);
Below you add some extern function declarations without the "extern"
keyword. I don't know what the convention is for arm64 (I omit the
"extern" for PCI), but it seems like you should at least be
consistent.
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS];
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +extern void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +extern const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 16:35 [PATCH v9 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:47 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:35 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:35 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:35 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] arm64, numa: adding " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] Documentation, dt, arm64/arm: dt bindings for numa Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:28 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
[not found] ` <1453134965-6125-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-28 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:24 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:24 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] arm64, dt, thunderx: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunderx in 2 node topology Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] PCI: generic: Make pci-host-generic driver numa aware Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 6:10 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:59 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
[not found] ` <CAFpQJXXESn1EA5kotVOH2oLbRUSpOLf6+MeWG1pY_GhUP+4vVQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:44 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
[not found] ` <1453134965-6125-6-git-send-email-gkulkarni-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v9 6/6] topology, cleanup: Avoid redefinition of cpumask_of_pcibus in asm header files Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160126185238.GB17600@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-metag@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@r \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rfranz@cavium.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.