From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>Ar
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:08:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128180824.GP775@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFpQJXVhEVw7vSq233wfkOGkTanf-msO+PEcWJ2OVAFUhn7n+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:42:17PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Subject is "arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding ..." What is the significance
> >> of the "arm" part? The other patches only mention "arm64".
> >>
> >> General comment: the code below has little, if anything, that is
> >> actually arm64-specific. Maybe this is the first DT-based NUMA
> >> platform? I don't see other similar code for other arches, so maybe
> >> it's too early to try to generalize it, but we should try to avoid
> >> adding duplicates of this code if/when other arches do show up.
> >
> > Having it in the core code would allow us to share it with arch/arm/
> > fairly straightforwardly.
> This binding can be used for arm too.
> however at this moment it is the need of arm64 platforms.
> can we please keep this to arm64 as it's too early to try to
> generalize it(as Bjorn suggested)
> I prefer to keep it as it is, otherwise ok.
> Please suggest.
My suggestions time and time again on the NUMA patches from you have
consistently been around consolidation of existing code, or moving things
that aren't architecture-specific out of the architecture code.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:08:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128180824.GP775@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFpQJXVhEVw7vSq233wfkOGkTanf-msO+PEcWJ2OVAFUhn7n+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:42:17PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Subject is "arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding ..." What is the significance
> >> of the "arm" part? The other patches only mention "arm64".
> >>
> >> General comment: the code below has little, if anything, that is
> >> actually arm64-specific. Maybe this is the first DT-based NUMA
> >> platform? I don't see other similar code for other arches, so maybe
> >> it's too early to try to generalize it, but we should try to avoid
> >> adding duplicates of this code if/when other arches do show up.
> >
> > Having it in the core code would allow us to share it with arch/arm/
> > fairly straightforwardly.
> This binding can be used for arm too.
> however at this moment it is the need of arm64 platforms.
> can we please keep this to arm64 as it's too early to try to
> generalize it(as Bjorn suggested)
> I prefer to keep it as it is, otherwise ok.
> Please suggest.
My suggestions time and time again on the NUMA patches from you have
consistently been around consolidation of existing code, or moving things
that aren't architecture-specific out of the architecture code.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:08:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128180824.GP775@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFpQJXVhEVw7vSq233wfkOGkTanf-msO+PEcWJ2OVAFUhn7n+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:42:17PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Subject is "arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding ..." What is the significance
> >> of the "arm" part? The other patches only mention "arm64".
> >>
> >> General comment: the code below has little, if anything, that is
> >> actually arm64-specific. Maybe this is the first DT-based NUMA
> >> platform? I don't see other similar code for other arches, so maybe
> >> it's too early to try to generalize it, but we should try to avoid
> >> adding duplicates of this code if/when other arches do show up.
> >
> > Having it in the core code would allow us to share it with arch/arm/
> > fairly straightforwardly.
> This binding can be used for arm too.
> however at this moment it is the need of arm64 platforms.
> can we please keep this to arm64 as it's too early to try to
> generalize it(as Bjorn suggested)
> I prefer to keep it as it is, otherwise ok.
> Please suggest.
My suggestions time and time again on the NUMA patches from you have
consistently been around consolidation of existing code, or moving things
that aren't architecture-specific out of the architecture code.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:08:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128180824.GP775@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFpQJXVhEVw7vSq233wfkOGkTanf-msO+PEcWJ2OVAFUhn7n+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:42:17PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Subject is "arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding ..." What is the significance
> >> of the "arm" part? The other patches only mention "arm64".
> >>
> >> General comment: the code below has little, if anything, that is
> >> actually arm64-specific. Maybe this is the first DT-based NUMA
> >> platform? I don't see other similar code for other arches, so maybe
> >> it's too early to try to generalize it, but we should try to avoid
> >> adding duplicates of this code if/when other arches do show up.
> >
> > Having it in the core code would allow us to share it with arch/arm/
> > fairly straightforwardly.
> This binding can be used for arm too.
> however at this moment it is the need of arm64 platforms.
> can we please keep this to arm64 as it's too early to try to
> generalize it(as Bjorn suggested)
> I prefer to keep it as it is, otherwise ok.
> Please suggest.
My suggestions time and time again on the NUMA patches from you have
consistently been around consolidation of existing code, or moving things
that aren't architecture-specific out of the architecture code.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
Ar
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:08:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128180824.GP775@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFpQJXVhEVw7vSq233wfkOGkTanf-msO+PEcWJ2OVAFUhn7n+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:42:17PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Subject is "arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding ..." What is the significance
> >> of the "arm" part? The other patches only mention "arm64".
> >>
> >> General comment: the code below has little, if anything, that is
> >> actually arm64-specific. Maybe this is the first DT-based NUMA
> >> platform? I don't see other similar code for other arches, so maybe
> >> it's too early to try to generalize it, but we should try to avoid
> >> adding duplicates of this code if/when other arches do show up.
> >
> > Having it in the core code would allow us to share it with arch/arm/
> > fairly straightforwardly.
> This binding can be used for arm too.
> however at this moment it is the need of arm64 platforms.
> can we please keep this to arm64 as it's too early to try to
> generalize it(as Bjorn suggested)
> I prefer to keep it as it is, otherwise ok.
> Please suggest.
My suggestions time and time again on the NUMA patches from you have
consistently been around consolidation of existing code, or moving things
that aren't architecture-specific out of the architecture code.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 16:35 [PATCH v9 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:47 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:35 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:35 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:35 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] arm64, numa: adding " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] Documentation, dt, arm64/arm: dt bindings for numa Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-20 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:28 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-26 17:16 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
[not found] ` <1453134965-6125-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-28 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:24 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:24 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 17:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-28 18:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] arm64, dt, thunderx: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunderx in 2 node topology Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:49 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] PCI: generic: Make pci-host-generic driver numa aware Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-18 17:41 ` David Daney
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 6:10 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:59 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 5:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
[not found] ` <CAFpQJXXESn1EA5kotVOH2oLbRUSpOLf6+MeWG1pY_GhUP+4vVQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 9:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:44 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-19 12:32 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
[not found] ` <1453134965-6125-6-git-send-email-gkulkarni-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-26 20:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-18 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v9 6/6] topology, cleanup: Avoid redefinition of cpumask_of_pcibus in asm header files Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-01-18 16:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160128180824.GP775@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=gpkulkarni@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-metag@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rfranz@cavium.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.