From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:35:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294a1469-01d6-10fb-5de1-b1d4513a066c@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -void dma_debug_init(u32 num_entries)
>> +static int dma_debug_init(void)
>> {
>> + u32 num_entries;
>
> Maybe initialise it to PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES?
We initialize it down in an if/else clause which seems a little more clear
to me, at the cost of two extra lines of code. But I suspect I should
just go a little further and merge the global req_entries and the local
num_entries into a single variable with a better name.
>> +core_initcall(dma_debug_init);
>
> I think it's worth noting that for most users this now happens much earlier
> than before. In general that's probably good (e.g. on arm64 it should
> prevent false-positives from the Arm SMMU drivers under ACPI), and I can't
> imagine it's high-risk, but it is a behaviour change.
I'll mention this in the changelog, thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294a1469-01d6-10fb-5de1-b1d4513a066c@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -void dma_debug_init(u32 num_entries)
>> +static int dma_debug_init(void)
>> {
>> + u32 num_entries;
>
> Maybe initialise it to PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES?
We initialize it down in an if/else clause which seems a little more clear
to me, at the cost of two extra lines of code. But I suspect I should
just go a little further and merge the global req_entries and the local
num_entries into a single variable with a better name.
>> +core_initcall(dma_debug_init);
>
> I think it's worth noting that for most users this now happens much earlier
> than before. In general that's probably good (e.g. on arm64 it should
> prevent false-positives from the Arm SMMU drivers under ACPI), and I can't
> imagine it's high-risk, but it is a behaviour change.
I'll mention this in the changelog, thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294a1469-01d6-10fb-5de1-b1d4513a066c@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -void dma_debug_init(u32 num_entries)
>> +static int dma_debug_init(void)
>> {
>> + u32 num_entries;
>
> Maybe initialise it to PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES?
We initialize it down in an if/else clause which seems a little more clear
to me, at the cost of two extra lines of code. But I suspect I should
just go a little further and merge the global req_entries and the local
num_entries into a single variable with a better name.
>> +core_initcall(dma_debug_init);
>
> I think it's worth noting that for most users this now happens much earlier
> than before. In general that's probably good (e.g. on arm64 it should
> prevent false-positives from the Arm SMMU drivers under ACPI), and I can't
> imagine it's high-risk, but it is a behaviour change.
I'll mention this in the changelog, thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294a1469-01d6-10fb-5de1-b1d4513a066c@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018@11:23:43AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -void dma_debug_init(u32 num_entries)
>> +static int dma_debug_init(void)
>> {
>> + u32 num_entries;
>
> Maybe initialise it to PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES?
We initialize it down in an if/else clause which seems a little more clear
to me, at the cost of two extra lines of code. But I suspect I should
just go a little further and merge the global req_entries and the local
num_entries into a single variable with a better name.
>> +core_initcall(dma_debug_init);
>
> I think it's worth noting that for most users this now happens much earlier
> than before. In general that's probably good (e.g. on arm64 it should
> prevent false-positives from the Arm SMMU drivers under ACPI), and I can't
> imagine it's high-risk, but it is a behaviour change.
I'll mention this in the changelog, thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294a1469-01d6-10fb-5de1-b1d4513a066c@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -void dma_debug_init(u32 num_entries)
>> +static int dma_debug_init(void)
>> {
>> + u32 num_entries;
>
> Maybe initialise it to PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES?
We initialize it down in an if/else clause which seems a little more clear
to me, at the cost of two extra lines of code. But I suspect I should
just go a little further and merge the global req_entries and the local
num_entries into a single variable with a better name.
>> +core_initcall(dma_debug_init);
>
> I think it's worth noting that for most users this now happens much earlier
> than before. In general that's probably good (e.g. on arm64 it should
> prevent false-positives from the Arm SMMU drivers under ACPI), and I can't
> imagine it's high-risk, but it is a behaviour change.
I'll mention this in the changelog, thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294a1469-01d6-10fb-5de1-b1d4513a066c@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -void dma_debug_init(u32 num_entries)
>> +static int dma_debug_init(void)
>> {
>> + u32 num_entries;
>
> Maybe initialise it to PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES?
We initialize it down in an if/else clause which seems a little more clear
to me, at the cost of two extra lines of code. But I suspect I should
just go a little further and merge the global req_entries and the local
num_entries into a single variable with a better name.
>> +core_initcall(dma_debug_init);
>
> I think it's worth noting that for most users this now happens much earlier
> than before. In general that's probably good (e.g. on arm64 it should
> prevent false-positives from the Arm SMMU drivers under ACPI), and I can't
> imagine it's high-risk, but it is a behaviour change.
I'll mention this in the changelog, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 310+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 8:02 Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] (no subject) Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` No subject Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` (unknown), Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` (unknown) Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 01/22] dma-debug: move initialization to common code Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-20 10:23 ` [OpenRISC] " Robin Murphy
2018-04-20 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-20 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-20 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-20 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-04-24 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-04-24 7:35 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 02/22] dma-mapping: simplify Kconfig dependencies Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 03/22] dma-mapping: provide a generic dma-noncoherent implementation Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 04/22] alpha: use dma_direct_ops for jensen Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 05/22] alpha: simplify get_arch_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 06/22] arc: use generic dma_noncoherent_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-25 11:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch
2018-04-26 6:45 ` [OpenRISC] " hch
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch at lst.de
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch
2018-04-26 6:45 ` hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` [OpenRISC] " hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch at lst.de
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch
2018-04-26 8:25 ` hch
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 07/22] arm-nommu: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [PATCH 08/22] c6x: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 09/22] hexagon: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 10/22] m68k: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 11/22] microblaze: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 12/22] microblaze: remove the consistent_sync and consistent_sync_page Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 13/22] nds32: use generic dma_noncoherent_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-23 6:49 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-23 6:49 ` [OpenRISC] " Greentime Hu
2018-04-23 6:49 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-23 6:49 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-23 6:49 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-23 6:49 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-23 8:09 ` Michael Schmitz
2018-04-23 11:03 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-24 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 19:16 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 1:43 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 1:43 ` [OpenRISC] " Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 1:43 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 1:43 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 1:43 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 1:43 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 12:25 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 12:25 ` [OpenRISC] " Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 12:25 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 12:25 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 12:25 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-25 12:25 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 6:42 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 8:06 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 8:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 8:06 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 8:06 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 8:06 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 8:06 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 8:24 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-26 9:39 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 9:39 ` [OpenRISC] " Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 9:39 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 9:39 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 9:39 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-26 9:39 ` Greentime Hu
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 14/22] nios2: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 15/22] openrisc: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 16/22] sh: simplify get_arch_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 17/22] sh: introduce a sh_cacheop_vaddr helper Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 18/22] sh: use dma_direct_ops for the CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT case Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 19/22] sh: use generic dma_noncoherent_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 20/22] xtensa: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 21/22] sparc: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 22/22] parisc: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-21 17:43 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 17:43 ` [OpenRISC] " Helge Deller
2018-04-21 17:43 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 17:43 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 17:43 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 17:43 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 17:43 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 21:52 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:52 ` [OpenRISC] " James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:52 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:52 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:52 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:52 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-25 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 7:21 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-25 21:07 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-25 21:07 ` [OpenRISC] " Helge Deller
2018-04-25 21:07 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-25 21:07 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-25 21:07 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-25 21:07 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-25 21:07 ` Helge Deller
2018-04-21 21:42 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:42 ` [OpenRISC] " James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:42 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:42 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:42 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-21 21:42 ` James Bottomley
2018-04-24 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 8:20 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180424073524.GB18945@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
--cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.