All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:54:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180730145425.GE1206094@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730144647.GX24267@dhcp22.suse.cz>

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 04:46:47PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 30-07-18 23:34:23, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > On 2018/07/30 18:32, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > This one is waiting for draining and we are in mm_percpu_wq WQ context
> > > which has its rescuer so no other activity can block us for ever. So
> > > this certainly shouldn't deadlock. It can be dead slow but well, this is
> > > what you will get when your shoot your system to death.
> > 
> > We need schedule_timeout_*() to allow such WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues to wake up. (Tejun,
> > is my understanding correct?) Lack of schedule_timeout_*() does block WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
> > workqueues forever.
> 
> Hmm. This doesn't match my understanding of what WQ_MEM_RECLAIM actually
> guarantees. If you are right then the whole thing sounds quite fragile
> to me TBH.

Workqueue doesn't think the cpu is stalled as long as one of the
per-cpu kworkers is running.  The assumption is that kernel threads
are not supposed to be busy-looping indefinitely (and they really
shouldn't).  We can add timeout mechanism to workqueue so that it
kicks off other kworkers if one of them is in running state for too
long, but idk, if there's an indefinite busy loop condition in kernel
threads, we really should get rid of them and hung task watchdog is
pretty effective at finding these cases (at least with preemption
disabled).

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26 11:06 [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry() Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-26 11:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-26 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-27 15:47   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30  9:32     ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 14:34       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30 14:46         ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 14:54           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-07-30 15:25             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30 15:44               ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-30 18:51                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 19:10                   ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 19:10                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 21:01                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-31  5:09                       ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-31 10:47                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-31 11:15                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-31 11:30                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-31 11:55                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-02 22:05                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-03  6:16                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-21 21:07                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-22  7:32                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 20:06                               ` David Rientjes
2018-08-23 21:00                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-23 22:45                                   ` David Rientjes
2018-08-24  0:31                                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-05 13:20                                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-05 13:40                                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-05 13:53                                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-05 14:04                                             ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-06  1:00                                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-06  5:57                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-06  6:22                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-06  7:03                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30 19:14                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-27 13:51 Michal Hocko
2018-08-27 13:51 ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180730145425.GE1206094@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.