All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:04:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180905140451.GG14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81cc1f29-e42e-7813-dc70-5d6d9e999dd1@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

On Wed 05-09-18 22:53:33, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/09/05 22:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Changelog said 
> > 
> > "Although this is possible in principle let's wait for it to actually
> > happen in real life before we make the locking more complex again."
> > 
> > So what is the real life workload that hits it? The log you have pasted
> > below doesn't tell much.
> 
> Nothing special. I just ran a multi-threaded memory eater on a CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernel.

I strongly suspec that your test doesn't really represent or simulate
any real and useful workload. Sure it triggers a rare race and we kill
another oom victim. Does this warrant to make the code more complex?
Well, I am not convinced, as I've said countless times.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-05 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26 11:06 [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry() Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-26 11:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-26 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-27 15:47   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30  9:32     ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 14:34       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30 14:46         ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 14:54           ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-30 15:25             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30 15:44               ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-30 18:51                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 19:10                   ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 19:10                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 21:01                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-31  5:09                       ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-31 10:47                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-31 11:15                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-31 11:30                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-31 11:55                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-02 22:05                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-03  6:16                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-21 21:07                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-22  7:32                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 20:06                               ` David Rientjes
2018-08-23 21:00                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-23 22:45                                   ` David Rientjes
2018-08-24  0:31                                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-05 13:20                                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-05 13:40                                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-05 13:53                                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-05 14:04                                             ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-09-06  1:00                                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-06  5:57                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-06  6:22                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-06  7:03                                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-30 19:14                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-27 13:51 Michal Hocko
2018-08-27 13:51 ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180905140451.GG14951@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.