From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 16:16:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005161642.2462-4-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005161642.2462-1-logang@deltatee.com>
Cleanup the arm64_memory_present() function seeing it's very
similar to other arches.
memblocks_present() is a direct replacement of arm64_memory_present()
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 20 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 787e27964ab9..63fa9653f281 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -296,24 +296,6 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
-}
-#else
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
- struct memblock_region *reg;
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
-}
-#endif
-
static phys_addr_t memory_limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
/*
@@ -506,7 +488,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
* Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(), so must be
* done after the fixed reservations.
*/
- arm64_memory_present();
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
zone_sizes_init(min, max);
--
2.19.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:16:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005161642.2462-4-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005161642.2462-1-logang@deltatee.com>
Cleanup the arm64_memory_present() function seeing it's very
similar to other arches.
memblocks_present() is a direct replacement of arm64_memory_present()
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 20 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 787e27964ab9..63fa9653f281 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -296,24 +296,6 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
-}
-#else
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
- struct memblock_region *reg;
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
-}
-#endif
-
static phys_addr_t memory_limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
/*
@@ -506,7 +488,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
* Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(), so must be
* done after the fixed reservations.
*/
- arm64_memory_present();
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
zone_sizes_init(min, max);
--
2.19.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: logang@deltatee.com (Logan Gunthorpe)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:16:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005161642.2462-4-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005161642.2462-1-logang@deltatee.com>
Cleanup the arm64_memory_present() function seeing it's very
similar to other arches.
memblocks_present() is a direct replacement of arm64_memory_present()
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 20 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 787e27964ab9..63fa9653f281 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -296,24 +296,6 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
-}
-#else
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
- struct memblock_region *reg;
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
-}
-#endif
-
static phys_addr_t memory_limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
/*
@@ -506,7 +488,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
* Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(), so must be
* done after the fixed reservations.
*/
- arm64_memory_present();
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
zone_sizes_init(min, max);
--
2.19.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:16:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005161642.2462-4-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181005161640.nYNuvvghcJGJEU5IusD083xJ1L1k1BLJkYk-TZl_yYw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005161642.2462-1-logang@deltatee.com>
Cleanup the arm64_memory_present() function seeing it's very
similar to other arches.
memblocks_present() is a direct replacement of arm64_memory_present()
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 20 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 787e27964ab9..63fa9653f281 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -296,24 +296,6 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
-}
-#else
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
- struct memblock_region *reg;
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
-}
-#endif
-
static phys_addr_t memory_limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
/*
@@ -506,7 +488,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
* Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(), so must be
* done after the fixed reservations.
*/
- arm64_memory_present();
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
zone_sizes_init(min, max);
--
2.19.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: logang@deltatee.com (Logan Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:16:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005161642.2462-4-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005161642.2462-1-logang@deltatee.com>
Cleanup the arm64_memory_present() function seeing it's very
similar to other arches.
memblocks_present() is a direct replacement of arm64_memory_present()
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 20 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 787e27964ab9..63fa9653f281 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -296,24 +296,6 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
-}
-#else
-static void __init arm64_memory_present(void)
-{
- struct memblock_region *reg;
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
- int nid = memblock_get_region_node(reg);
-
- memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
- memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
- }
-}
-#endif
-
static phys_addr_t memory_limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
/*
@@ -506,7 +488,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
* Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(), so must be
* done after the fixed reservations.
*/
- arm64_memory_present();
+ memblocks_present();
sparse_init();
zone_sizes_init(min, max);
--
2.19.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-05 16:16 [PATCH 0/5] sparsemem support for RISC-V Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/sparse: add common helper to mark all memblocks present Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2018-10-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: " Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-05 16:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-05 16:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-05 16:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-05 16:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] sh: " Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Implement sparsemem Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-05 16:16 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 0:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 0:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 0:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 0:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 0:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 0:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 12:18 ` Stephen Bates
2018-10-11 12:18 ` Stephen Bates
2018-10-11 12:18 ` Stephen Bates
2018-10-11 12:18 ` Stephen Bates
2018-10-11 12:18 ` Stephen Bates
2018-10-11 12:18 ` Stephen Bates
2018-10-15 17:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-15 17:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-15 17:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-15 17:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-15 17:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-15 17:39 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-11 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 16:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 16:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 16:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 16:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 16:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 17:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 18:45 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 18:45 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 18:45 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 18:45 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 18:45 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 20:21 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 20:21 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 20:21 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 20:21 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2018-10-11 20:21 ` Logan Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181005161642.2462-4-logang@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.