From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>,
Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 09:40:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181014074024.GA17216@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181014054252.GA24103@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > There is nothing architecture specific in the PCMCIA core, so allow
> > building it everywhere. The actual host controllers will depend on ISA,
> > PCI or a specific SOC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Looks good to me, though I'm interested on any subtle (build) breakage when
> this gets exposure in -next. Will you push this patch upstream directly, or
> should it go in via the pcmcia tree? If it is the former, feel free to add
The patches in the series depend on each other (just in terms of
context). I suspect the best would be to get it into the kbuild tree.
It has survived the build bot, which found some interesting issues in
the other patches (as well as the !UML dependency), but if more issues
show I can keep you in the loop.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 09:40:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181014074024.GA17216@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181014054252.GA24103@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > There is nothing architecture specific in the PCMCIA core, so allow
> > building it everywhere. The actual host controllers will depend on ISA,
> > PCI or a specific SOC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Looks good to me, though I'm interested on any subtle (build) breakage when
> this gets exposure in -next. Will you push this patch upstream directly, or
> should it go in via the pcmcia tree? If it is the former, feel free to add
The patches in the series depend on each other (just in terms of
context). I suspect the best would be to get it into the kbuild tree.
It has survived the build bot, which found some interesting issues in
the other patches (as well as the !UML dependency), but if more issues
show I can keep you in the loop.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-14 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-13 15:10 move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] aha152x: rename the PCMCIA define Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 20:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-15 20:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] powerpc: simplify CONFIG_PCI_QSPAN Kconfig magic Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 6:35 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 6:35 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc: PCI_MSI needs PCI Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] pci: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 6:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 6:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 9:17 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 9:17 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 20:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-15 20:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-14 5:42 ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-10-14 5:42 ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-10-14 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-10-14 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] rapidio: consolidate RAPIDIO config entry in drivers/rapidio Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] eisa: consolidate EISA Kconfig entry in drivers/eisa Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 6:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 6:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-13 15:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] kconfig: remove CONFIG_MCA leftovers Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-13 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-16 5:20 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-16 5:20 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-17 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-14 6:23 ` move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-14 6:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-15 6:38 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 6:38 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-15 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 8:01 move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ v2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 8:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181014074024.GA17216@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alex.bou9@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.