All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 12:14:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181123111428.GF8625@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181123084934.GI4266@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri 23-11-18 09:49:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:53:34PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-11-22 16:51:04)
> > > Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
> > > callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
> > > implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
> > 
> > Most callers could handle the failure correctly. It looks like the
> > failure was not propagated for convenience.
> 
> I have no idea whether the mm is semantically ok if pte shootdown doesn't
> work for all sorts of strange reasons. From the commit that introduced the
> error code it souded like this was very much only ok in the limited case
> of an already killed process, in the oom killer path, where it's really
> only about trying to free any kind of memory. And where the process is
> gone already, so semantics of what exactly happens don't matter that much
> anymore.

Yes this was indeed the case. There is still the exit path which would
do the rest of the work so we are not leaving anything behind. 
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-23 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-22 16:51 [PATCH 0/3] RFC: mmu notifier debug checks Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-22 16:53     ` Chris Wilson
2018-11-22 16:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-23  8:49     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 11:14       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-11-22 18:50   ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-22 18:50     ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-23 11:15   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 11:15     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 11:15     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 12:30     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:30       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:30       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:43       ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:15         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:15           ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:30           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 18:55   ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-22 18:55     ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-23  8:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23  8:46       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23  8:46       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 10:14       ` Christian König
2018-11-23 11:12   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 11:12     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 12:38     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:38       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:46       ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:12         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:12           ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:23           ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:51   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27  7:49   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27  7:49     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27  7:49     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 16:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 16:49       ` Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:28       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 17:28         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 17:33         ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:33           ` Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:39           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 17:39             ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 17:39             ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 18:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for RFC: mmu notifier debug checks Patchwork
2018-11-22 18:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-23  0:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181123111428.GF8625@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.