All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v5 15/17] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:50:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211165041.u75t6li6ympzq3mk@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14061728-2ca3-3342-2cf3-b8588b112f5f@openedev.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1655 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:05:43PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/18 10:02 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:47:27PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Minimum PLL used for MIPI is 500MHz, as per manual, but
> > > lowering the min rate by 300MHz can result proper working
> > > nkms divider with the help of desired dclock rate from
> > > panel driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > index 181b599dc163..b623c8150b4f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static struct ccu_nkm pll_mipi_clk = {
> > >   	.n		= _SUNXI_CCU_MULT(8, 4),
> > >   	.k		= _SUNXI_CCU_MULT_MIN(4, 2, 2),
> > >   	.m		= _SUNXI_CCU_DIV(0, 4),
> > > +	.min_rate	= 300000000,		/* Actual rate is 500MHz */
> > 
> > That comment still doesn't make any sense. Is it running at 500MHz or 300?
> 
> It running in 300MHz, actual rate is 500MHz.

If it's running at 300MHz, its actual rate should be 300MHz...

> > Also, IIRC you had a patch adding support for maximum boundaries in
> > your previous patch, where did it go?
> 
> Since I don't have any usecase to test I droped it. the same mentioned on
> the previous version.

Ok.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v5 15/17] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:50:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211165041.u75t6li6ympzq3mk@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14061728-2ca3-3342-2cf3-b8588b112f5f@openedev.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1655 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:05:43PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/18 10:02 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:47:27PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Minimum PLL used for MIPI is 500MHz, as per manual, but
> > > lowering the min rate by 300MHz can result proper working
> > > nkms divider with the help of desired dclock rate from
> > > panel driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > index 181b599dc163..b623c8150b4f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static struct ccu_nkm pll_mipi_clk = {
> > >   	.n		= _SUNXI_CCU_MULT(8, 4),
> > >   	.k		= _SUNXI_CCU_MULT_MIN(4, 2, 2),
> > >   	.m		= _SUNXI_CCU_DIV(0, 4),
> > > +	.min_rate	= 300000000,		/* Actual rate is 500MHz */
> > 
> > That comment still doesn't make any sense. Is it running at 500MHz or 300?
> 
> It running in 300MHz, actual rate is 500MHz.

If it's running at 300MHz, its actual rate should be 300MHz...

> > Also, IIRC you had a patch adding support for maximum boundaries in
> > your previous patch, where did it go?
> 
> Since I don't have any usecase to test I droped it. the same mentioned on
> the previous version.

Ok.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan-oRp2ZoJdM/RWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki
	<jagan-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
	Michael Turquette
	<mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	Michael Trimarchi
	<michael-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-amarula-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 15/17] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:50:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211165041.u75t6li6ympzq3mk@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14061728-2ca3-3342-2cf3-b8588b112f5f-oRp2ZoJdM/RWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1666 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:05:43PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/18 10:02 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:47:27PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Minimum PLL used for MIPI is 500MHz, as per manual, but
> > > lowering the min rate by 300MHz can result proper working
> > > nkms divider with the help of desired dclock rate from
> > > panel driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > index 181b599dc163..b623c8150b4f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> > > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static struct ccu_nkm pll_mipi_clk = {
> > >   	.n		= _SUNXI_CCU_MULT(8, 4),
> > >   	.k		= _SUNXI_CCU_MULT_MIN(4, 2, 2),
> > >   	.m		= _SUNXI_CCU_DIV(0, 4),
> > > +	.min_rate	= 300000000,		/* Actual rate is 500MHz */
> > 
> > That comment still doesn't make any sense. Is it running at 500MHz or 300?
> 
> It running in 300MHz, actual rate is 500MHz.

If it's running at 300MHz, its actual rate should be 300MHz...

> > Also, IIRC you had a patch adding support for maximum boundaries in
> > your previous patch, where did it go?
> 
> Since I don't have any usecase to test I droped it. the same mentioned on
> the previous version.

Ok.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-11 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-10 16:17 [PATCH v5 00/17] drm/sun4i: Allwinner A64 MIPI-DSI support Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] clk: sunxi-ng: Add check for minimal rate to NKM PLLs Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Add has_mod_clk quirk Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Add Allwinner A64 MIPI DSI support Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add compatible for A64 MIPI DSI Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Add DSI Generic short write 2 param transfer Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix TCON DRQ set bits Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Refactor vertical video start delay Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 16:49   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:49     ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:49     ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 17:00     ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 17:00       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 17:00       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 19:43       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 19:43         ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 19:43         ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-19 15:50       ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-19 15:50         ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-19 15:50         ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-20 20:56     ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-20 20:56       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-20 20:56       ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-06 16:29       ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-06 16:29         ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-06 16:29         ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-07 14:11       ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-07 14:11         ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-07 14:11         ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-07 15:18         ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-07 15:18           ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-07 15:18           ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-08  8:58           ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-08  8:58             ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-08  8:58             ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-09 13:27             ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-12 16:43               ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-12 16:43                 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-12 16:43                 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-12 19:37                 ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-12 19:37                   ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-12 19:37                   ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-16 19:17                   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-16 19:17                     ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-16 19:17                     ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-17  4:32                     ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-17  4:32                       ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-17  4:32                       ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-18 15:44                       ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-18 15:44                         ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-18 15:44                         ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-22 11:11                         ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-22 11:11                           ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-22 11:11                           ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-22 11:51                           ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-22 11:51                             ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-22 11:51                             ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-25 21:21                             ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-25 21:21                               ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-25 21:21                               ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-22 11:14                       ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-22 11:14                         ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-22 11:14                         ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix DSI hbp timing value Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix DSI hblk timing calculation Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Add DSI hblk packet overhead Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix DSI hfp timing value Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Set proper vblk timing calculation Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Add support for VCC-DSI voltage regulator Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add VCC-DSI supply property Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 16:32   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:32     ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:32     ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:35     ` [linux-sunxi] " Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 16:35       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 16:35       ` [linux-sunxi] " Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 16:50       ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2018-12-11 16:50         ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:50         ` [linux-sunxi] " Maxime Ripard
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add A64 DPHY compatible (w/ A31 fallback) Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add DSI pipeline Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-10 16:17   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-11 16:34   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:34     ` Maxime Ripard
2018-12-11 16:34     ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181211165041.u75t6li6ympzq3mk@flea \
    --to=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jagan@openedev.com \
    --cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.