From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64: compat: Add vDSO
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:32:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190222143221.GL42419@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222122430.21180-14-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:24:20PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b149761d9661
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 ARM Limited
> + */
> +#ifndef __COMPAT_BARRIER_H
> +#define __COMPAT_BARRIER_H
> +
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
I think it would be safer to not include this header, and explicitly
define the AArch32 barriers here in isolation.
> +
> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 8
> +#define aarch32_smp_mb() dmb(ish)
> +#define aarch32_smp_rmb() dmb(ishld)
> +#define aarch32_smp_wmb() dmb(ishst)
> +#else
> +#define aarch32_smp_mb() dmb(ish)
> +#define aarch32_smp_rmb() aarch32_smp_mb()
> +#define aarch32_smp_wmb() dmb(ishst)
> +#endif
Can't we just code an AArch32-specific version of dmb() here? AFAICT
that's the only reason we include the native barrier.h.
> +/*
> + * Warning: This code is meant to be used with
> + * ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO only.
> + */
> +#ifndef ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO
> +#error This header is meant to be used with ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO only
> +#endif
> +
> +#undef smp_mb
> +#undef smp_rmb
> +#undef smp_wmb
> +
> +#define smp_mb() aarch32_smp_mb()
> +#define smp_rmb() aarch32_smp_rmb()
> +#define smp_wmb() aarch32_smp_wmb()
This undeffing looks very fragile to me.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4fea950fa5ed
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +vdso.lds
> +vdso.so.raw
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ba57d2ae620f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Makefile for vdso32
> +#
> +
> +# Absolute relocation type $(ARCH_REL_TYPE_ABS) needs to be defined before
> +# the inclusion of generic Makefile.
> +ARCH_REL_TYPE_ABS := R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT|R_ARM_GLOB_DAT|R_ARM_ABS32
> +include $(srctree)/lib/vdso/Makefile
> +
> +CC_ARM32 := $(CROSS_COMPILE_ARM32)gcc
To match HOSTCC, it might make sense to call this COMPATCC
... and likewise, CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT
Thanks,
Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64: compat: Add vDSO
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:32:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190222143221.GL42419@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190222143221.DTa_BOUu5wJHNZMMr3QYrsSA2Ei10mRe7-5layoBWRw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222122430.21180-14-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:24:20PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b149761d9661
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 ARM Limited
> + */
> +#ifndef __COMPAT_BARRIER_H
> +#define __COMPAT_BARRIER_H
> +
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
I think it would be safer to not include this header, and explicitly
define the AArch32 barriers here in isolation.
> +
> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 8
> +#define aarch32_smp_mb() dmb(ish)
> +#define aarch32_smp_rmb() dmb(ishld)
> +#define aarch32_smp_wmb() dmb(ishst)
> +#else
> +#define aarch32_smp_mb() dmb(ish)
> +#define aarch32_smp_rmb() aarch32_smp_mb()
> +#define aarch32_smp_wmb() dmb(ishst)
> +#endif
Can't we just code an AArch32-specific version of dmb() here? AFAICT
that's the only reason we include the native barrier.h.
> +/*
> + * Warning: This code is meant to be used with
> + * ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO only.
> + */
> +#ifndef ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO
> +#error This header is meant to be used with ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO only
> +#endif
> +
> +#undef smp_mb
> +#undef smp_rmb
> +#undef smp_wmb
> +
> +#define smp_mb() aarch32_smp_mb()
> +#define smp_rmb() aarch32_smp_rmb()
> +#define smp_wmb() aarch32_smp_wmb()
This undeffing looks very fragile to me.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4fea950fa5ed
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +vdso.lds
> +vdso.so.raw
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ba57d2ae620f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Makefile for vdso32
> +#
> +
> +# Absolute relocation type $(ARCH_REL_TYPE_ABS) needs to be defined before
> +# the inclusion of generic Makefile.
> +ARCH_REL_TYPE_ABS := R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT|R_ARM_GLOB_DAT|R_ARM_ABS32
> +include $(srctree)/lib/vdso/Makefile
> +
> +CC_ARM32 := $(CROSS_COMPILE_ARM32)gcc
To match HOSTCC, it might make sense to call this COMPATCC
... and likewise, CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT
Thanks,
Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64: compat: Add vDSO
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:32:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190222143221.GL42419@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222122430.21180-14-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:24:20PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b149761d9661
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/compat_barrier.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 ARM Limited
> + */
> +#ifndef __COMPAT_BARRIER_H
> +#define __COMPAT_BARRIER_H
> +
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
I think it would be safer to not include this header, and explicitly
define the AArch32 barriers here in isolation.
> +
> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 8
> +#define aarch32_smp_mb() dmb(ish)
> +#define aarch32_smp_rmb() dmb(ishld)
> +#define aarch32_smp_wmb() dmb(ishst)
> +#else
> +#define aarch32_smp_mb() dmb(ish)
> +#define aarch32_smp_rmb() aarch32_smp_mb()
> +#define aarch32_smp_wmb() dmb(ishst)
> +#endif
Can't we just code an AArch32-specific version of dmb() here? AFAICT
that's the only reason we include the native barrier.h.
> +/*
> + * Warning: This code is meant to be used with
> + * ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO only.
> + */
> +#ifndef ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO
> +#error This header is meant to be used with ENABLE_COMPAT_VDSO only
> +#endif
> +
> +#undef smp_mb
> +#undef smp_rmb
> +#undef smp_wmb
> +
> +#define smp_mb() aarch32_smp_mb()
> +#define smp_rmb() aarch32_smp_rmb()
> +#define smp_wmb() aarch32_smp_wmb()
This undeffing looks very fragile to me.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4fea950fa5ed
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/.gitignore
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +vdso.lds
> +vdso.so.raw
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ba57d2ae620f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Makefile for vdso32
> +#
> +
> +# Absolute relocation type $(ARCH_REL_TYPE_ABS) needs to be defined before
> +# the inclusion of generic Makefile.
> +ARCH_REL_TYPE_ABS := R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT|R_ARM_GLOB_DAT|R_ARM_ABS32
> +include $(srctree)/lib/vdso/Makefile
> +
> +CC_ARM32 := $(CROSS_COMPILE_ARM32)gcc
To match HOSTCC, it might make sense to call this COMPATCC
... and likewise, CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT
Thanks,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-22 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 178+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 12:24 [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/23] kernel: Standardize vdso_datapage Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:58 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:58 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:58 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-23 16:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 16:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 16:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-27 14:23 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 14:23 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 14:23 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-22 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-22 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-22 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-22 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-22 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-27 14:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 14:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 14:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] vdso: use fixed-size time types Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] vdso: add clock_gettime64 Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] vdso: use fixed-size time types Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-28 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-28 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-28 13:45 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 13:45 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 13:45 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-23 10:34 ` [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 10:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 10:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-25 14:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-25 14:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-25 14:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-23 17:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 17:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 17:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-27 13:47 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 13:47 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 13:47 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 15:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-27 15:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-27 15:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-27 16:06 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 16:06 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 16:06 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/23] arm64: Build vDSO with -ffixed-x18 Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/23] arm64: Substitute gettimeofday with C implementation Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 13:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 13:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 13:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/23] arm64: compat: Alloc separate pages for vectors and sigpage Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/23] arm64: compat: Split kuser32 Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 07/23] arm64: compat: Refactor aarch32_alloc_vdso_pages() Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 08/23] arm64: compat: Add KUSER_HELPERS config option Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 14:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-02-22 14:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-02-22 14:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-02-26 12:10 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-26 12:10 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-26 12:10 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 09/23] arm64: compat: Add missing syscall numbers Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 10/23] arm64: compat: Expose signal related structures Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 11/23] arm64: compat: Generate asm offsets for signals Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 14:22 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:22 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:22 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 12/23] lib: vdso: Add compat support Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64: compat: Add vDSO Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 14:32 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-02-22 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 14/23] arm64: Refactor vDSO code Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 14:37 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:37 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:37 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 15/23] arm64: compat: vDSO setup for compat layer Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 16/23] arm64: elf: vDSO code page discovery Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 17/23] arm64: compat: Get sigreturn trampolines from vDSO Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 18/23] arm64: Add vDSO compat support Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 19/23] arm64: Enable compat vDSO support Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 14:39 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:39 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:39 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:41 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:41 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 14:41 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 20/23] arm: Add support for generic vDSO Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 21/23] mips: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 22/23] x86: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-23 10:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 10:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 10:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-27 16:18 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 16:18 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-27 16:18 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 23/23] kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-22 12:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-23 17:39 ` [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 17:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-23 17:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-28 11:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 11:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 12:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 12:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 12:42 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 12:42 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 12:42 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-28 15:51 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 15:51 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-02-28 15:51 ` Vincenzo Frascino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190222143221.GL42419@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=salyzyn@android.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.