All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/27] mtd: nand: Let software ECC engines be retrieved from the NAND core
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:13:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225171322.654189c8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225164933.4b0e1489@xps13>

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:49:33 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote on Fri, 22 Feb 2019
> 15:29:57 +0100:
> 
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:57:59 +0100
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Before making use of the ECC engines, we must retrieve them. Add the
> > > boilerplate for the ones already available: software engines (Hamming
> > > and BCH).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c              | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand-sw-bch-engine.h     |  3 +++
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand-sw-hamming-engine.h |  3 +++
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h                   |  3 +++
> > >  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c
> > > index 7dd3f9772698..318dbb2d56a2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c
> > > @@ -286,6 +286,20 @@ bool nand_ecc_correction_is_enough(struct nand_device *nand)
> > >  	return corr >= ds_corr && conf->strength >= reqs->strength;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +struct nand_ecc_engine *nand_ecc_sw_get_engine(struct nand_device *nand)    
> > 
> > What if you want to instantiate SW ECC with a custom layout? Can't we
> > instead have a function that create a new engine dynamically?
> > 
> > struct nand_ecc_engine *
> > nand_ecc_create_sw_engine(struct nand_device* nand,
> > 			  enum nand_ecc_algo algo,
> > 			  struct mtd_ooblayout *layout);
> > 
> >   
> 
> Right now, for both sw engines, a default layout is applied if there is
> none at engine initialization time.
> 
> Also, do we really need a "create" helper? I don't see what's created
> there. Maybe you had something else in mind, and the
> ecc_sw_xxx_get_engine() approach do not match what you expected, so
> please tell me more about your idea, otherwise I don't see what a
> nand_ecc_create_sw_engine() would bring.

The layout is part of the ECC engine properties, which I why I suggest
to create one engine instance per user and specify the layout to use
at instance creation time.

> 
> >   
> > > +{
> > > +	switch (nand->ecc.user_conf.algo) {    
> > 
> > Note that the conf is supposed to be passed afterwards, when the ctx is
> > created, so you should check nand->ecc.user_conf directly here.  
> 
> I think this is what I do so I suspect the above sentence is not what
> you actually meant?

Sorry, I meant "should not". My point is, the user_conf should only be
passed at context creation time, and should not be modified in-place by
the caller, unless proven necessary.

There's really 2 different steps that I think need to be isolated:

1/ retrieve/create an ECC engine instance (SW, HW-controller-side,
   on-die)
2/ ask this ECC engine instance to create a context out of a user conf

Your user_conf seems 2 mix the 2 concepts: the engine to use, the
strength/step-size you expect.

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/27] mtd: nand: Let software ECC engines be retrieved from the NAND core
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:13:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225171322.654189c8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225164933.4b0e1489@xps13>

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:49:33 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote on Fri, 22 Feb 2019
> 15:29:57 +0100:
> 
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:57:59 +0100
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Before making use of the ECC engines, we must retrieve them. Add the
> > > boilerplate for the ones already available: software engines (Hamming
> > > and BCH).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c              | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand-sw-bch-engine.h     |  3 +++
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand-sw-hamming-engine.h |  3 +++
> > >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h                   |  3 +++
> > >  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c
> > > index 7dd3f9772698..318dbb2d56a2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc/engine.c
> > > @@ -286,6 +286,20 @@ bool nand_ecc_correction_is_enough(struct nand_device *nand)
> > >  	return corr >= ds_corr && conf->strength >= reqs->strength;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +struct nand_ecc_engine *nand_ecc_sw_get_engine(struct nand_device *nand)    
> > 
> > What if you want to instantiate SW ECC with a custom layout? Can't we
> > instead have a function that create a new engine dynamically?
> > 
> > struct nand_ecc_engine *
> > nand_ecc_create_sw_engine(struct nand_device* nand,
> > 			  enum nand_ecc_algo algo,
> > 			  struct mtd_ooblayout *layout);
> > 
> >   
> 
> Right now, for both sw engines, a default layout is applied if there is
> none at engine initialization time.
> 
> Also, do we really need a "create" helper? I don't see what's created
> there. Maybe you had something else in mind, and the
> ecc_sw_xxx_get_engine() approach do not match what you expected, so
> please tell me more about your idea, otherwise I don't see what a
> nand_ecc_create_sw_engine() would bring.

The layout is part of the ECC engine properties, which I why I suggest
to create one engine instance per user and specify the layout to use
at instance creation time.

> 
> >   
> > > +{
> > > +	switch (nand->ecc.user_conf.algo) {    
> > 
> > Note that the conf is supposed to be passed afterwards, when the ctx is
> > created, so you should check nand->ecc.user_conf directly here.  
> 
> I think this is what I do so I suspect the above sentence is not what
> you actually meant?

Sorry, I meant "should not". My point is, the user_conf should only be
passed at context creation time, and should not be modified in-place by
the caller, unless proven necessary.

There's really 2 different steps that I think need to be isolated:

1/ retrieve/create an ECC engine instance (SW, HW-controller-side,
   on-die)
2/ ask this ECC engine instance to create a context out of a user conf

Your user_conf seems 2 mix the 2 concepts: the engine to use, the
strength/step-size you expect.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-21 12:57 [RFC PATCH 13/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Clarify the software Hamming introductory line Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Turn the software Hamming implementation generic Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:22   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 13:22     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/27] mtd: nand: Remove useless include about software Hamming ECC Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Let the software BCH ECC engine be a module Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:48   ` Adam Ford
2019-02-21 13:48     ` Adam Ford
2019-02-21 14:02     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 14:02       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-22 14:24       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-22 14:24         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 17/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Let the software Hamming ECC engine be unselected Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:20   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 13:20     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 13:35     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:35       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:41       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 13:41         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 13:46         ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:46           ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 18/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Create the software BCH engine instance Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 19/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Create the software Hamming " Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57 ` [RFC PATCH 20/27] mtd: nand: Let software ECC engines be retrieved from the NAND core Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:57   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-22 14:29   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-22 14:29     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-25 15:49     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-25 15:49       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-25 16:13       ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-02-25 16:13         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-26 15:54         ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-26 15:54           ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH 21/27] mtd: spinand: Fix typo in comment Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-22 14:31   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-22 14:31     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH 22/27] mtd: spinand: Let the SPI-NAND core flag a SPI-NAND chip Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-22 14:33   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-22 14:33     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH 23/27] mtd: spinand: Move the ECC helper functions into a separate file Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH 24/27] mtd: spinand: Instantiate a SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-22 14:38   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-22 14:38     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] mtd: nand: Add helpers to manage ECC engines and configurations Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:58   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-22 14:44   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-22 14:44     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-25 16:01     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-25 16:01       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-25 16:34       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-25 16:34         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-25 18:48         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-25 18:48           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-26 15:59           ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] mtd: nand: Add helpers to manage ECC engines and configurationsND Miquel Raynal
2019-02-26 15:59             ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-26 16:04             ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-26 16:04               ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-27 14:07     ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] mtd: nand: Add helpers to manage ECC engines and configurations Miquel Raynal
2019-02-27 14:07       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-27 14:30       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-27 14:30         ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190225171322.654189c8@kernel.org \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
    --cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.