All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: james.morse@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	julien.thierry@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: [RFC v2 13/14] arm/kvm: Introduce a new VMID allocator
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:06:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620130608.17230-14-julien.grall@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620130608.17230-1-julien.grall@arm.com>

A follow-up patch will replace the KVM VMID allocator with the arm64 ASID
allocator.

To avoid as much as possible duplication, the arm KVM code will directly
compile arch/arm64/lib/asid.c. The header is a verbatim to copy to
avoid breaking the assumption that architecture port has self-containers
headers.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>

---
    I hit a warning when compiling the ASID code:

linux/arch/arm/kvm/../../arm64/lib/asid.c:17: warning: "ASID_MASK" redefined
 #define ASID_MASK(info)   (~GENMASK((info)->bits - 1, 0))

In file included from linux/include/linux/mm_types.h:18,
                 from linux/include/linux/mmzone.h:21,
                 from linux/include/linux/gfp.h:6,
                 from linux/include/linux/slab.h:15,
                 from linux/arch/arm/kvm/../../arm64/lib/asid.c:11:
linux/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h:26: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define ASID_MASK ((~0ULL) << ASID_BITS)

I haven't yet resolved because I am not sure of the best way to go.
AFAICT ASID_MASK is only used in mm/context.c. So I am wondering whether
it would be acceptable to move the define.

    Changes in v2:
        - Re-use arm64/lib/asid.c rather than duplication the code.
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/Makefile           |  1 +
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..79bce4686d21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__
+#define __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+struct asid_info
+{
+	atomic64_t	generation;
+	unsigned long	*map;
+	atomic64_t __percpu	*active;
+	u64 __percpu		*reserved;
+	u32			bits;
+	/* Lock protecting the structure */
+	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
+	/* Which CPU requires context flush on next call */
+	cpumask_t		flush_pending;
+	/* Number of ASID allocated by context (shift value) */
+	unsigned int		ctxt_shift;
+	/* Callback to locally flush the context. */
+	void			(*flush_cpu_ctxt_cb)(void);
+	/* Callback to call when a context is updated */
+	void			(*update_ctxt_cb)(void *ctxt);
+};
+
+#define NUM_ASIDS(info)			(1UL << ((info)->bits))
+#define NUM_CTXT_ASIDS(info)		(NUM_ASIDS(info) >> (info)->ctxt_shift)
+
+#define active_asid(info, cpu)	*per_cpu_ptr((info)->active, cpu)
+
+void asid_new_context(struct asid_info *info, atomic64_t *pasid,
+		      unsigned int cpu, void *ctxt);
+
+/*
+ * Check the ASID is still valid for the context. If not generate a new ASID.
+ *
+ * @pasid: Pointer to the current ASID batch
+ * @cpu: current CPU ID. Must have been acquired throught get_cpu()
+ */
+static inline void asid_check_context(struct asid_info *info,
+				       atomic64_t *pasid, unsigned int cpu,
+				       void *ctxt)
+{
+	u64 asid, old_active_asid;
+
+	asid = atomic64_read(pasid);
+
+	/*
+	 * The memory ordering here is subtle.
+	 * If our active_asid is non-zero and the ASID matches the current
+	 * generation, then we update the active_asid entry with a relaxed
+	 * cmpxchg. Racing with a concurrent rollover means that either:
+	 *
+	 * - We get a zero back from the cmpxchg and end up waiting on the
+	 *   lock. Taking the lock synchronises with the rollover and so
+	 *   we are forced to see the updated generation.
+	 *
+	 * - We get a valid ASID back from the cmpxchg, which means the
+	 *   relaxed xchg in flush_context will treat us as reserved
+	 *   because atomic RmWs are totally ordered for a given location.
+	 */
+	old_active_asid = atomic64_read(&active_asid(info, cpu));
+	if (old_active_asid &&
+	    !((asid ^ atomic64_read(&info->generation)) >> info->bits) &&
+	    atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(&active_asid(info, cpu),
+				     old_active_asid, asid))
+		return;
+
+	asid_new_context(info, pasid, cpu, ctxt);
+}
+
+int asid_allocator_init(struct asid_info *info,
+			u32 bits, unsigned int asid_per_ctxt,
+			void (*flush_cpu_ctxt_cb)(void),
+			void (*update_ctxt_cb)(void *ctxt));
+
+#endif /* __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
index 531e59f5be9c..6ab49bd84531 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
@@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-its.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
+obj-y += ../../arm64/lib/asid.o
-- 
2.11.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC v2 13/14] arm/kvm: Introduce a new VMID allocator
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:06:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620130608.17230-14-julien.grall@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620130608.17230-1-julien.grall@arm.com>

A follow-up patch will replace the KVM VMID allocator with the arm64 ASID
allocator.

To avoid as much as possible duplication, the arm KVM code will directly
compile arch/arm64/lib/asid.c. The header is a verbatim to copy to
avoid breaking the assumption that architecture port has self-containers
headers.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>

---
    I hit a warning when compiling the ASID code:

linux/arch/arm/kvm/../../arm64/lib/asid.c:17: warning: "ASID_MASK" redefined
 #define ASID_MASK(info)   (~GENMASK((info)->bits - 1, 0))

In file included from linux/include/linux/mm_types.h:18,
                 from linux/include/linux/mmzone.h:21,
                 from linux/include/linux/gfp.h:6,
                 from linux/include/linux/slab.h:15,
                 from linux/arch/arm/kvm/../../arm64/lib/asid.c:11:
linux/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h:26: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define ASID_MASK ((~0ULL) << ASID_BITS)

I haven't yet resolved because I am not sure of the best way to go.
AFAICT ASID_MASK is only used in mm/context.c. So I am wondering whether
it would be acceptable to move the define.

    Changes in v2:
        - Re-use arm64/lib/asid.c rather than duplication the code.
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/Makefile           |  1 +
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..79bce4686d21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__
+#define __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+struct asid_info
+{
+	atomic64_t	generation;
+	unsigned long	*map;
+	atomic64_t __percpu	*active;
+	u64 __percpu		*reserved;
+	u32			bits;
+	/* Lock protecting the structure */
+	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
+	/* Which CPU requires context flush on next call */
+	cpumask_t		flush_pending;
+	/* Number of ASID allocated by context (shift value) */
+	unsigned int		ctxt_shift;
+	/* Callback to locally flush the context. */
+	void			(*flush_cpu_ctxt_cb)(void);
+	/* Callback to call when a context is updated */
+	void			(*update_ctxt_cb)(void *ctxt);
+};
+
+#define NUM_ASIDS(info)			(1UL << ((info)->bits))
+#define NUM_CTXT_ASIDS(info)		(NUM_ASIDS(info) >> (info)->ctxt_shift)
+
+#define active_asid(info, cpu)	*per_cpu_ptr((info)->active, cpu)
+
+void asid_new_context(struct asid_info *info, atomic64_t *pasid,
+		      unsigned int cpu, void *ctxt);
+
+/*
+ * Check the ASID is still valid for the context. If not generate a new ASID.
+ *
+ * @pasid: Pointer to the current ASID batch
+ * @cpu: current CPU ID. Must have been acquired throught get_cpu()
+ */
+static inline void asid_check_context(struct asid_info *info,
+				       atomic64_t *pasid, unsigned int cpu,
+				       void *ctxt)
+{
+	u64 asid, old_active_asid;
+
+	asid = atomic64_read(pasid);
+
+	/*
+	 * The memory ordering here is subtle.
+	 * If our active_asid is non-zero and the ASID matches the current
+	 * generation, then we update the active_asid entry with a relaxed
+	 * cmpxchg. Racing with a concurrent rollover means that either:
+	 *
+	 * - We get a zero back from the cmpxchg and end up waiting on the
+	 *   lock. Taking the lock synchronises with the rollover and so
+	 *   we are forced to see the updated generation.
+	 *
+	 * - We get a valid ASID back from the cmpxchg, which means the
+	 *   relaxed xchg in flush_context will treat us as reserved
+	 *   because atomic RmWs are totally ordered for a given location.
+	 */
+	old_active_asid = atomic64_read(&active_asid(info, cpu));
+	if (old_active_asid &&
+	    !((asid ^ atomic64_read(&info->generation)) >> info->bits) &&
+	    atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(&active_asid(info, cpu),
+				     old_active_asid, asid))
+		return;
+
+	asid_new_context(info, pasid, cpu, ctxt);
+}
+
+int asid_allocator_init(struct asid_info *info,
+			u32 bits, unsigned int asid_per_ctxt,
+			void (*flush_cpu_ctxt_cb)(void),
+			void (*update_ctxt_cb)(void *ctxt));
+
+#endif /* __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
index 531e59f5be9c..6ab49bd84531 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
@@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-its.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
+obj-y += ../../arm64/lib/asid.o
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, julien.thierry@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	james.morse@arm.com
Subject: [RFC v2 13/14] arm/kvm: Introduce a new VMID allocator
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:06:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620130608.17230-14-julien.grall@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620130608.17230-1-julien.grall@arm.com>

A follow-up patch will replace the KVM VMID allocator with the arm64 ASID
allocator.

To avoid as much as possible duplication, the arm KVM code will directly
compile arch/arm64/lib/asid.c. The header is a verbatim to copy to
avoid breaking the assumption that architecture port has self-containers
headers.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>

---
    I hit a warning when compiling the ASID code:

linux/arch/arm/kvm/../../arm64/lib/asid.c:17: warning: "ASID_MASK" redefined
 #define ASID_MASK(info)   (~GENMASK((info)->bits - 1, 0))

In file included from linux/include/linux/mm_types.h:18,
                 from linux/include/linux/mmzone.h:21,
                 from linux/include/linux/gfp.h:6,
                 from linux/include/linux/slab.h:15,
                 from linux/arch/arm/kvm/../../arm64/lib/asid.c:11:
linux/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h:26: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define ASID_MASK ((~0ULL) << ASID_BITS)

I haven't yet resolved because I am not sure of the best way to go.
AFAICT ASID_MASK is only used in mm/context.c. So I am wondering whether
it would be acceptable to move the define.

    Changes in v2:
        - Re-use arm64/lib/asid.c rather than duplication the code.
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/Makefile           |  1 +
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..79bce4686d21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/lib_asid.h
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__
+#define __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+struct asid_info
+{
+	atomic64_t	generation;
+	unsigned long	*map;
+	atomic64_t __percpu	*active;
+	u64 __percpu		*reserved;
+	u32			bits;
+	/* Lock protecting the structure */
+	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
+	/* Which CPU requires context flush on next call */
+	cpumask_t		flush_pending;
+	/* Number of ASID allocated by context (shift value) */
+	unsigned int		ctxt_shift;
+	/* Callback to locally flush the context. */
+	void			(*flush_cpu_ctxt_cb)(void);
+	/* Callback to call when a context is updated */
+	void			(*update_ctxt_cb)(void *ctxt);
+};
+
+#define NUM_ASIDS(info)			(1UL << ((info)->bits))
+#define NUM_CTXT_ASIDS(info)		(NUM_ASIDS(info) >> (info)->ctxt_shift)
+
+#define active_asid(info, cpu)	*per_cpu_ptr((info)->active, cpu)
+
+void asid_new_context(struct asid_info *info, atomic64_t *pasid,
+		      unsigned int cpu, void *ctxt);
+
+/*
+ * Check the ASID is still valid for the context. If not generate a new ASID.
+ *
+ * @pasid: Pointer to the current ASID batch
+ * @cpu: current CPU ID. Must have been acquired throught get_cpu()
+ */
+static inline void asid_check_context(struct asid_info *info,
+				       atomic64_t *pasid, unsigned int cpu,
+				       void *ctxt)
+{
+	u64 asid, old_active_asid;
+
+	asid = atomic64_read(pasid);
+
+	/*
+	 * The memory ordering here is subtle.
+	 * If our active_asid is non-zero and the ASID matches the current
+	 * generation, then we update the active_asid entry with a relaxed
+	 * cmpxchg. Racing with a concurrent rollover means that either:
+	 *
+	 * - We get a zero back from the cmpxchg and end up waiting on the
+	 *   lock. Taking the lock synchronises with the rollover and so
+	 *   we are forced to see the updated generation.
+	 *
+	 * - We get a valid ASID back from the cmpxchg, which means the
+	 *   relaxed xchg in flush_context will treat us as reserved
+	 *   because atomic RmWs are totally ordered for a given location.
+	 */
+	old_active_asid = atomic64_read(&active_asid(info, cpu));
+	if (old_active_asid &&
+	    !((asid ^ atomic64_read(&info->generation)) >> info->bits) &&
+	    atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(&active_asid(info, cpu),
+				     old_active_asid, asid))
+		return;
+
+	asid_new_context(info, pasid, cpu, ctxt);
+}
+
+int asid_allocator_init(struct asid_info *info,
+			u32 bits, unsigned int asid_per_ctxt,
+			void (*flush_cpu_ctxt_cb)(void),
+			void (*update_ctxt_cb)(void *ctxt));
+
+#endif /* __ARM_LIB_ASID_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
index 531e59f5be9c..6ab49bd84531 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
@@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-its.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
 obj-y += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
+obj-y += ../../arm64/lib/asid.o
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 13:05 [RFC v2 00/14] kvm/arm: Align the VMID allocation with the arm64 ASID one Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` [RFC v2 01/14] arm64/mm: Introduce asid_info structure and move asid_generation/asid_map to it Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` [RFC v2 02/14] arm64/mm: Move active_asids and reserved_asids to asid_info Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` [RFC v2 03/14] arm64/mm: Move bits " Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` [RFC v2 04/14] arm64/mm: Move the variable lock and tlb_flush_pending " Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05 ` [RFC v2 05/14] arm64/mm: Remove dependency on MM in new_context Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:05   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 06/14] arm64/mm: Store the number of asid allocated per context Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 07/14] arm64/mm: Introduce NUM_ASIDS Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 08/14] arm64/mm: Split asid_inits in 2 parts Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 09/14] arm64/mm: Split the function check_and_switch_context in 3 parts Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 10/14] arm64/mm: Introduce a callback to flush the local context Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 11/14] arm64: Move the ASID allocator code in a separate file Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-07-04 14:56   ` James Morse
2019-07-04 14:56     ` James Morse
2019-07-04 14:56     ` James Morse
2019-07-15 10:58     ` Julien Grall
2019-07-15 10:58       ` Julien Grall
2019-07-15 10:58       ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 12/14] arm64/lib: asid: Allow user to update the context under the lock Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-07-03 17:35   ` James Morse
2019-07-03 17:35     ` James Morse
2019-07-03 17:35     ` James Morse
2019-07-15 14:38     ` Julien Grall
2019-07-15 14:38       ` Julien Grall
2019-07-15 14:38       ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2019-06-20 13:06   ` [RFC v2 13/14] arm/kvm: Introduce a new VMID allocator Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06 ` [RFC v2 14/14] kvm/arm: Align the VMID allocation with the arm64 ASID one Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-20 13:06   ` Julien Grall
2019-07-03 17:36   ` James Morse
2019-07-03 17:36     ` James Morse
2019-07-03 17:36     ` James Morse
2019-07-15 17:06     ` Julien Grall
2019-07-15 17:06       ` Julien Grall
2019-07-15 17:06       ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620130608.17230-14-julien.grall@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.