From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bird, Timothy <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715205101.AB55B2145D@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g45iHnMLOGQbXwzX6F74pkQGKBCSufkpYPOcw_iNSeiQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)
> > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> > > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644
>
> > One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
> > logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
> > into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
> > copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
> > function that takes GFP flags.
>
> Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
> on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
> I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
"Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715205101.AB55B2145D@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g45iHnMLOGQbXwzX6F74pkQGKBCSufkpYPOcw_iNSeiQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)
> > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> > > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644
>
> > One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
> > logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
> > into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
> > copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
> > function that takes GFP flags.
>
> Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
> on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
> I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715205101.AB55B2145D@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g45iHnMLOGQbXwzX6F74pkQGKBCSufkpYPOcw_iNSeiQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)
> > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> > > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644
>
> > One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
> > logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
> > into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
> > copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
> > function that takes GFP flags.
>
> Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
> on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
> I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
"Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715205101.AB55B2145D@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g45iHnMLOGQbXwzX6F74pkQGKBCSufkpYPOcw_iNSeiQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)
> > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> > > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644
>
> > One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
> > logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
> > into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
> > copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
> > function that takes GFP flags.
>
> Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
> on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
> I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bird, Timothy <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715205101.AB55B2145D@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g45iHnMLOGQbXwzX6F74pkQGKBCSufkpYPOcw_iNSeiQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)
> > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> > > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644
>
> > One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
> > logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
> > into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
> > copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
> > function that takes GFP flags.
>
> Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
> on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
> I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-15 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 218+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 8:17 [PATCH v9 00/18] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20190718175024.C3EC421019-+nuXSHJNwjE76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20190722200347.261D3218C9-+nuXSHJNwjE76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20190722235411.06C1320840-+nuXSHJNwjE76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <CAFd5g46iAhDZ5C_chi7oYLVOkwcoj6+0nw+kPWuXhqWwWKd9jA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <CAFd5g473iFfvBnJs2pcwuJYgY+DpgD6RLzyDFL1otUuScgKUag-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] kunit: test: add the concept of assertions Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <20190712081744.87097-1-brendanhiggins-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] kbuild: enable building KUnit Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <20190712081744.87097-7-brendanhiggins-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] kunit: test: add initial tests Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] kunit: test: add support for test abort Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] kunit: defconfig: add defconfigs for building " Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec() Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] MAINTAINERS: add proc sysctl KUnit test to PROC SYSCTL section Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190715205101.AB55B2145D@mail.kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=knut.omang@oracle.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.